It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Fitting the bill" is an opinion.
Are you trying to say the egg was perfect? Thats impossible.
You know the environment changes right?
You know other animals exist right?
You know things around the egg change right?
You know mutations can be random right?
Its nothing contradictory about it. Something will cause the egg to change.
Originally posted by Vandettas
You know mutations can be random right?
Originally posted by totallackey
No rules? Haphazard?
Thanks for the tip, this will give me something interesting to research.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Such behaviour may seem bizarre, but it is quite in keeping with a certain kind of religious mindset: the one in which a few authorities 'in the know' do their best to hide certain potentially damaging truths from the rest of the believers. Lay Catholics were formerly discouraged from reading the Bible for precisely this reason.
As you know very well, mutation is not evolution. Mutation is the raw material on which natural selection (a highly nonrandom, rule-based process) acts.
The mechanism of evolution is natural selection. Why are you so afraid that your co-religionists will learn about evolution? Are you afraid they will lose their faith? Have you lost yours?
Originally posted by totallackey
reply to post by Astyanax
I have no horse in the race.
So, spell the rules out. Rules indicate order. Order them out, one by one, and apply them to the context of eggs. Simple. I have not seen it in this thread.
Just post the written rules and demonstrate how those rules answers the issue of hard and soft shelled eggs.
Originally posted by totallackey
reply to post by Astyanax
Heredity has dictated these creatures continue to exist AS IS and still produce soft shelled eggs. At the same time, there are also creatures present in the same environmental conditions producing...wait for it...hard shelled eggs?
What rules?
Again, avoiding the issue.
Are you incapable of answering the question?
You just keep repeating, "natural selection ," natural selection," over and over again. You are like a skipping 45 or 33 and 3rd...
Currently observable facts (a fundamental aspect of science) indicate many different types of creatures bearing soft shelled eggs in many different type of environments. Heredity has dictated these creatures continue to exist AS IS and still produce soft shelled eggs. At the same time, there are also creatures present in the same environmental conditions producing...wait for it...hard shelled eggs?
Are you telling me you are unaware there are creatures inhabiting the same environments bearing live young, hard shelled eggs, and soft shelled eggs?
If you answered the question, I missed it.
Lifestyles? Eating, reproducing, sleeping...does this not constitute lifestyle?
All creatures share this lifestyle. What else is there?
I am unsure of what you mean regarding my use of the word "creature."
Okay...you list one rule. Survival of the fittest. I see this as indicating there is only one fit way to deal with surviving in a specific environment.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by heineken
Has anyone ever wondered (and come up with a reason) WHY creatures moved from sea to land? If there was no life on land (no vegetation or bugs to eat) what compelled creatures to climb out of the water in the first place?
'Creature' implies a creator – as you are very well aware.
No. The specific behaviour associated with those activities does.
Are you suggesting that a coral has the same lifestyle as a red snapper?
I would love to see you justify that statement logically.
the state or fact of continuing to live or exist, typically in spite of an accident, ordeal, or difficult circumstances: the animal’s chances of survival were pretty low
of a suitable quality, standard, or type to meet the required purpose: