It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Our ancestors were able to think a solution to a specific problem and change something inside their DNA.
The feedback is of course, the ability to survive and reproduce. I don't think the animals were thinking about it that much, they just laid their eggs wherever their instincts told them to, and when that ended up being in better hidden spots on land, more of those eggs survived, so that could then become the norm, rather than the water. The better hidden eggs could have a higher survival rate, and there were moist hiding places on land:
Originally posted by heineken
who or what noticed a hard shell egg was needed ?
who gave me the feedback to whom that the egg was not surviving on land ?
do you agree there is some sort of feedback of whats going on ?
If you think about the part I quoted, there are lots of clues.
Although some modern amphibians lay eggs on land, with or without significant protection, they all lack advanced traits like an amnion. This kind of egg became possible only with internal fertilization. The outer membrane, a soft shell, evolved as a protection against the harsher environments on land, as species evolved to lay their eggs on land where they were safer than in the water. The ancestors of the amniotes probably laid their eggs in moist places, as such modest-sized animals would not have difficulty finding depressions under fallen logs or other suitable places in the ancient forests; and dry conditions were probably not the main reason the soft shell emerged.[3] Indeed, many modern day amniotes are dependent on moisture to keep their eggs from desiccating.
One of the greatest evolutionary innovations of the Carboniferous period (360 - 268 million years ago) was the amniotic egg, which allowed early reptiles to move away from waterside habitats and colonise dry regions. The amniotic egg allowed the ancestors of birds, mammals, and reptiles to reproduce on land by preventing the embryo inside from drying out, so eggs could be laid away from the water.
still it seems there must be some sort of feedback right.
who or what noticed a hard shell egg was needed?
*
[ *ppBufOut = NULL;
D3D11_BUFFER_DESC desc;
ZeroMemory( &desc, sizeof(desc) );
desc.BindFlags = D3D11_BIND_UNORDERED_ACCESS | D3D11_BIND_SHADER_RESOURCE; desc.ByteWidth = uElementSize * uCount; desc.MiscFlags = D3D11_RESOURCE_MISC_BUFFER_STRUCTURED;
desc.StructureByteStride = uElementSize;
if ( pInitData ) [ D3D11_SUBRESOURCE_DATA InitData;
InitData.pSysMem = pInitData; return pDevice->CreateBuffer( &desc, &InitData, ppBufOut ); ] else return pDevice->CreateBuffer( &desc, NULL, ppBufOut ); ]
se·lect (s-lkt) v. se·lect·ed, se·lect·ing, se·lects
v.tr. To take as a choice from among several; pick out.
v.intr. To make a choice or selection.
Originally posted by heineken
This is where I get completely lost..So basically our ancestors were able to think a solution to a specific problem and change something inside their DNA.
Astyanax can describe it. It takes various forms, but in this video I'd describe it as big, brown and weighing about half a ton each:
Originally posted by heineken
nature is choosing you said..who is nature?
there must be something yet unknown to us...something me and a genius like you cant describe
A thoughtful post on evolution 421 in a thread that's grappling to understand evolution 101, so expecting a rigorous discussion of that topic in this thread would be unrealistic.
Originally posted by wujotvowujotvowujotvo
Ideology prevails in some evolutionists' academic circles.
When one don't recognise epigenetic mechanisms that justify parts of Lamarck's theory that strongly, just so they can deny some correctness of Lamarck, evolutionary discussions aren't that rigorous...
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by heineken
This is where I get completely lost..So basically our ancestors were able to think a solution to a specific problem and change something inside their DNA.
Indeed, you got completely lost. No thinking nor deliberate change in DNA from the part of our ancestors took place. More like, natural selection, for whatever reason, favored individuals that laid eggs with harder shells. Thus over time, the alleles that caused harder shells, became more frequent in this population.
Originally posted by heineken
who gave the feedback...who decided a hard shell is the way to go... (when I say WHO i refer to a process, an entity, chemistry..whatever)
Originally posted by heineken
sorry but you are lost..
There was no natural selection here
Is it that hard to grasp..
There was time where all the eggs ALL.. where jelly like soft shell...
So nature selected from nothing...there was nothing to choose from all eggs were soft...
Until there was a feedback that a hard shell was needed...
For whatever reason individuals started laying their eggs on land. Maybe it was more secure than the ocean? I don't know