It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by JBA2848
That is a pretty overinflated ego. He thinks markets will come back for no other reason than he would be president.
Corporations have a higher share of cash on their balance sheets than at any time in nearly half a century, as businesses build up buffers rather than invest in new plants or hiring.
online.wsj.com...
www.cnbc.com...
No, it's a fact. Obama creates an air of uncertainty. In uncertain times people and companies hoard cash. As soon as Obama is gone Romney can allay corporate fears and get the money moving. THAT will spur the economy most likely. As Romney said, there are no guarantees, only good plans and bad plans. His is a good one.
President Mitt Romney has a great plan.
-- Undo everything Obama has done. --
-- Lower the price of gas to $2 a gallon --
Here's the Electoral Map for November 7, 2012:
Originally posted by wascurious
Because you just making things up and saying they are true do not make it so.
ATS is so full of empty, baseless claims that NEVER get backed up.
Suppose you have the "script?" Know where it comes from exactly? Have anything resembling a factual statement you can offer?
This place is nothing like the reputation it carries. There is just as much just saying things you hope are true without even trying to back them up in reality as on GLP.
Originally posted by zroth
We are on like #9 of getting fooled now.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by campanionator
The map is stupid. Doesn't take away that Romney's plan is the one that works while Obama's puts us in debt with doing nothing. I have supplied quite a few sources in my posts that support that position. Keynesian economics don't work. Never have never will. Ask Greece.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by campanionator
Keynesian economics don't work. Never have never will. Ask Greece.
Originally posted by campanionator
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by campanionator
Keynesian economics don't work. Never have never will. Ask Greece.
Worked fine in the 50's when America was booming
Worked fine in the 80's when Reagan was leading the same Keynesian economy
worked fine in the late 90's
...
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by wascurious
Well if you believe anything the Obama campaign says you are fooled. So I suppose you simply don't believe anything they say? If so, I am with you.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by campanionator
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by campanionator
Keynesian economics don't work. Never have never will. Ask Greece.
Worked fine in the 50's when America was booming
Worked fine in the 80's when Reagan was leading the same Keynesian economy
worked fine in the late 90's
...
Well the argument over whether Reagan practiced Keynesian economics will hijack the thread. For the sake of moving forward, demand side Keynesian economics has never worked. Name a country that is successfuly practicing Keynesian economics on the demand side right now.
Originally posted by campanionator
You are mental if you think Reagan had a different economy -
He drove the National Debt up 180%, more % then Bush and Obama combined.
Demand side is where it is at. If you make sure that the people who create demand can buy things,
they will buy.
We have been trying this Supply Side model for 30 + years and subsequently it has also coincided
with the decline of wages, the outsourcing of jobs and the death of the middle class.
It does not take a genius to realize that if you make the rich richer, you will make everyone else that much
poorer. And the rich have become the richest IN HISTORY
has it trickled down? Because we should all be swimming in money if supply side worked.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by wascurious
Here is my thread.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
If my post wasn't following the topic of what you replied to I apologize. Anyway I sent you a link to a post, feel free to read and add your thoughts.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
No, you are. Show me any expert saying Reagan practiced demand side economics.
I'm confused, last post you said he was successful with his economic policies. Now you talk about raising debt. Are you saying raising debt is the measure of success? Please clarify your position regarding Reagan being successful and debt.
Great, more opinions, you're full of them. Show me ANY country using demand side keynesian economics that is sucessful.
Reagan did supply side, you said he was good. I'm confused.
Well, right now we are using demand side economics. So I suppose that is an indicator demand side doesn't work?
I'm confused again, last post you said trickle down ecomics practiced by Reagan worked well. Now you're saying it doesn't work. Can you make up your mind?
So in short, please provide evidence and give us sources we can read. Your opinions are noted, and as I told you earlier, are without merit. Please provide some actual information and stop contradicting yourself.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by campanionator
As always you can't form a coherent argument and supply lots of opinion with zero facts and no sources. Get back to me when you can make coherent claims and then back up your claims with sources. Have a good night.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Keynesian economics don't work. Never have never will.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by campanionator
The map is stupid. Doesn't take away that Romney's plan is the one that works while Obama's puts us in debt with doing nothing. I have supplied quite a few sources in my posts that support that position. Keynesian economics don't work. Never have never will. Ask Greece.