posted on Sep, 18 2012 @ 09:13 AM
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
I agree with the OP in that if you fight fire with fire you will get burned, there is always a diplomatic option and particularly when it comes to
something like this, the effect of using violence will likely be something like this:
Some people who disagree with police surveillance of the public have committed destructive acts
Therefore, all people who disagree with police surveillance of the public are likely to use violence
Terrorists use violence
Therefore, all those who disagree with police surveillance of the public are terrorists
These laws have been put in place by the american government
all terrorists are anti-american
therefore anyone who disagrees with laws put in place by the american government are anti-american
and therefore, are terrorists
and therefore, are certain to use violence
mix this together in a big cauldron of deceit and what do you get?
: Anyone who disagrees with laws put in place by the american government is a terrorist, and likely to use violence, therefore deadly force is
permitted to be used against anyone who disagrees with laws put in place by the american government.
But I understand that it can just get too much sometimes, and then youre not using youre head, completely understand that, but you never know, could
have been bilderberg approved destruction of police property to further the above end?