It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What is the point of this thread? Breibart is nothing but globalist neo-con propaganda.
Neo-Nazis donated to Ron Paul, does that make him a racist? You can't control who donated money to you.
Originally posted by seabag
Anti-Islam Filmmaker Donated Million Dollars To Obama Campaign
Blame the movie.
Even though "the movie" was on YouTube for months prior to the collective indignation of thousands of Middle Eastern Islamists all coming together on the eleventh anniversary of September 11th (through a wild coincidence, no doubt), we are being told by our government and our media overlords that we must blame the movie.
You see, if we blame the movie for the burning of our foreign outposts and the brutal murders of four Americans (including our Libyan ambassador who was reportedly raped), we won't blame the burners and the looters and the murderers and the rapists.
Blaming the movie and attacking this straw-man provides us a convenient target for our outrage and anger. The problem is the movie has been out for months. This movie was targeted for one reason; to throw us off the trail and prevent us from discovering that Obama’s foreign policy of backing away from the region and allowing events to unfold without US leadership is the cause of this violence.
If a movie that mocks Islam and the very foundation of religious beliefs is a catalyst for terrorism then why would Obama take $1 million dollars from the film maker?? Where was the outrage from the Islamic world over this release in 2009?? Why didn’t US embassies burn years ago?? Do you REALLY believe this is about a movie?
Originally posted by RELDDIR
Attacking Political Opponents/Censoring Freedom of Speech/Apologizing vs. Accepting Responsibility
Obama would have been a bigger man to take ownership of the situation at hand. This past week showed his true character and I am sorry to say he does not put the United States first.
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
Originally posted by intrepid
I'm confused as to the purpose of this thread. Anything to bash the other party? Anti-Islamic movie? I've read here from some that Obama is a "Muslim". Seems like mixed messages to me then.
Originally posted by seabag
This movie was targeted for one reason; to throw us off the trail and prevent us from discovering that Obama’s foreign policy of backing away from the region and allowing events to unfold without US leadership.
I'm sure it's only in America, maybe Britain too, that this is a prevalent opinion. The rest of the world doesn't want "US leadership".
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
The only people I've heard cry "Blame the Movie" are the right wing. Most people are blaming the people who attacked (and those who share their religion).
Nice attempt at deflection.
Maybe the White House press secretary can fill you in.
link
“This is a fairly volatile situation and it is in response not to United States policy, not to obviously the administration, not to the American people,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said Friday. “It is in response to a video, a film that we have judged to be reprehensible and disgusting. That in no way justifies any violent reaction to it, but this is not a case of protests directed at the United States writ large or at U.S. policy. This is in response to a video that is offensive to Muslims.”
Get it? US policies are not to blame…..it’s the fault of a movie.
That's where the problem comes in. Blaming ALL Muslims or the religion of Islam.
Only the people who made the movie are to blame for making the movie.
Only the people who attacked are to blame for the attack.
The people who attacked are to blame as are the policies of this administration. Maybe if the US stopped running around the ME changing out dictatorships and started minding its own business the attackers wouldn’t have been so outraged?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
The only people I've heard cry "Blame the Movie" are the right wing. :
Sorry to hear that. Here .. lemme' help you out there ....
Washington Examiner ... With Obama Policy Crumbling White House Blames Movie for MidEast Unrest
Hillary Clinton Blames Anti-Islam Film For Violence in The Middle East
"Blame the movie" .. all the DC Politicians are using it.
Originally posted by RELDDIR
Attacking Political Opponents/Censoring Freedom of Speech/Apologizing vs. Accepting Responsibility
Obama would have been a bigger man to take ownership of the situation at hand. This past week showed his true character and I am sorry to say he does not put the United States first.
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
Wtf?! I had to recheck the member name and still couldnt believe it!
Your ENTIRE post history violently contradicts the statement you just made.
What prompted the reversal? Hypocritical back-pedaling or magic Nibiru woo waves?
There are usually only a couple of purposes to "seabag's" threads, and they are as follows:
1. Promote anger or ridicule towards Obama and/or liberals.
2. Promote anger and war against Iran.
Sometimes these two objectives can be found in the same thread, like this one.
This thread, however, is rather silly. So what if Maher has donated to Obama? Its hilarious that you find offense that an atheist gives money to him, and seem to have no problem with corrupt individuals like, for example, the Koch brothers, when they give millions to politicians. But I guess in seabag's world, only liberals and Iran are to blame for almost everything.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by intrepid
I'm confused as to the purpose of this thread. Anything to bash the other party? Anti-Islamic movie? I've read here from some that Obama is a "Muslim". Seems like mixed messages to me then.
There is nothing confusing about the OP. Obama is blaming a movie for the attacks yet he has no problem accepting money from a guy who made such a movie. Obama wants to blame a movie yet his foreign policy incited this violent. Obama supports the Muslim Brotherhood!
Originally posted by Jeremiah65
This thread is confusing. You got a boner for Bill Maher or what? Religulous bashed all religions...derp-derp. He is an atheist btw.
This thread is confusing. You got a boner for Bill Maher or what? Religulous bashed all religions...derp-derp. He is an atheist btw.
Bill is a comedian.
The pundits on the MSM networks are not comedians...but they are jokes. True reporting of facts and true journalism died when all the media outlets...all...were bought up by something like 5 mego corporations. That news you heard that you didn't like? It's probably twisted and perverted. That news you heard that you thought was great...it was probably twisted and perverted.
You are considered "beneath" the level you actually get to know the facts and make up your own mind...your news and info is spoon fed with a large helping of editorial opinion to make sure you think the way they want you to think...
For the record, Maher is kinda snobbish...watch his show on occasion but it generally leaves me irritated and in a bad mood...kinda like Faux News and all the other MSM does.
Originally posted by popcornmafia
Originally posted by Jeremiah65
This thread is confusing. You got a boner for Bill Maher or what? Religulous bashed all religions...derp-derp. He is an atheist btw.
Confusing>?
Quite simple actually, boner stuffed face Maher made
anti-islamic remarks and gave money to Obama
Obama being the chump he is accepted
and the two of them with you, are hypocritical
morons see deeeeerpy deeerp deerpedit on 19-9-2012 by popcornmafia because: (no reason given)