reply to post by DJW001
Who lives in fear? They certainly don't, unless you're referring to abductions in which case I'm sure there are many who can reciprocate those fearful
feelings. What the Cassiopaeans promote, if they are even real, isn't fear.
And you're wrong because they, the Cassiopaeans, implicated Israel immediately, if the Cassiopaeans exist, and now there are implications becoming
known about Israel being involved, or even the masterminds, of 9/11. Only because it's Israel are you playing the Anti-semite card, but if they said
someone like Senegal you'd probably be more receptive to the idea.
I know overweight people who eat and live healthily. I cannot say what she does but she promotes healthy eating. You're basing your opinions off her
appearance while being completely ignorant of her message regarding health. I'm defending her because if she actually is channelling something giving
information then authorities would want to make her life difficult as well as certain organisations, which would make prosecuting her all the more
certain, but it hasn't happened. Yet I always accept that it could be a hoax and read it ALL with a grain of salt, so impartiality remains, despite
Yes, we are off-topic, but in the case against her being an Internet Kook, she uses a Ouija board that she claims to contact future versions of
ourselves who have evolved to exist at a higher dimension. Most of the info they hint at, because they rarely give answers and make the group come to
their own answers from their hints, is about the history of mankind and this planet. She always remains objective, and is always critical of the
information. I don't see how that is being a 'kook' if you've treated the experiment as such.
But whatever, you're allowed to believe what you like, and I'm allowed to read it for entertainment and maybe useful info, and wait until there is
ACTUAL evidence that she is a fraud, not just a couple of dodgy webpages, before I go making a judgement on her.
edit on 19-9-2012 by
LightAssassin because: (no reason given)