It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
I wish you would do a thread on ATS kooks, that would be funny!
I remember being on a thread about how simpsons predicted the end of the world XD
Wow, you're amazing, and no better than the slanderers trying to discredit her.
Let's ignore the dancing israeli's filming the event, the mass of israeli spy's arrested shortly thereafter....and all the other incriminating evidence.
Anti-semite, far out, I didn't think you would actually stoop that low but, alas, you have.
P.S. Again, attacking her looks is just pathetic. Who cares if she is overweight? She's had kids. I would hope you're not that seriously brainwashed to think that everyone who has kids can bounce straight back to a hollywood body? You know nothing yet you slander her based off of someone else's opinion.
She is certainly advocating a healthy lifestyle. She is objective with her 'experiment'. What more do you want?
Oh wait, you're the guy who judges a book by its cover. I forgot.
I still don't necessarily believe it but I'm not going to call her a hoax because I don't know if a Ouija board can be used to conduct 'super-luminal' communication, but it seems, given its use in history, that it could indeed be possible
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by idealord
Sorry, can't blame me for not uncovering every kook (or maybe I decided that you weren't one :p )
Thanks for adding another example to the guide, though!
You have no idea what humanities best interests are.
Furthermore, you should know that the future is fluid.
Furthermore, you should know that it is only your opinion that you are expressing when dictating what these 'future versions of ourselves' should and shouldn't tell us.
Furthermore, if someone is overweight but eats healthy and exercises regularly they won't lose weight and become hollywood model material, clearly something you are implying, unless of course you know her intimately and see precisely that she does not practice what she preaches....which of course is not the case, so again you are irrationally judging here.
Also, she didn't 'attack' the jews. The Cassiopaeans incriminated them, and even if they didn't and she implied it she certainly didn't stay on the topic for very long.
Yes, I'm not certain about anything but I'm not going to slander her when a couple of people have written bad things about her, none of which have officially 'checked out'. Like I want to pay any attention to a fraud! I don't, hence I researched.
It's so funny to see you have these limiting concepts that the future versions of ourselves should tell us what's going to happen in order for us to try convince the authorities that such an event is going to happen, which of course would merely place you in an asylum until said event occurs in which case you become a suspect.
You're whole basis for this argument is ridiculous.
Who lives in fear? They certainly don't, unless you're referring to abductions in which case I'm sure there are many who can reciprocate those fearful feelings. What the Cassiopaeans promote, if they are even real, isn't fear.
It's a hell of a challenge trying to round-up countless reports about the fire in the sky when your years' long attempts to broach others' awareness about the impending danger persistently falls on deaf ears.
And you're wrong because they, the Cassiopaeans, implicated Israel immediately, if the Cassiopaeans exist, and now there are implications becoming known about Israel being involved, or even the masterminds, of 9/11. Only because it's Israel are you playing the Anti-semite card, but if they said someone like Senegal you'd probably be more receptive to the idea.
I know overweight people who eat and live healthily. I cannot say what she does but she promotes healthy eating. You're basing your opinions off her appearance while being completely ignorant of her message regarding health. I'm defending her because if she actually is channelling something giving information then authorities would want to make her life difficult as well as certain organisations, which would make prosecuting her all the more certain, but it hasn't happened. Yet I always accept that it could be a hoax and read it ALL with a grain of salt, so impartiality remains, despite your accusations.
21 August 2007
Let's All Light Up!
As Joan Rivers was wont to say...
[edit for brevity --DJW001]
Nicotine DOUBLES the efficiency of our thinking. Hmmm... I think that makes it pretty clear why the PTB (Powers That Be) wish to stamp out smoking. After all, as one comment to the article mentioned, "if our immunity to emotional manipulation and psychopathic propaganda is directly proportional to the cortical control we can exert over the knee-jerk emotional reactions programmed into the amygdala. If smoking can DOUBLE the effective communication between the cortex and other parts of the brain, then what does that say about efforts to do away with smoking in the general population? Can't have any of the hysterical sheeple accidentally waking up and thinking rationally about their actions."
Yes, we are off-topic, but in the case against her being an Internet Kook, she uses a Ouija board that she claims to contact future versions of ourselves who have evolved to exist at a higher dimension. Most of the info they hint at, because they rarely give answers and make the group come to their own answers from their hints, is about the history of mankind and this planet. She always remains objective, and is always critical of the information. I don't see how that is being a 'kook' if you've treated the experiment as such.
Almost by definition,channeling messages by Ouija board makes her a kook. You cannot use something as subjective as a Ouija board and claim to be objective. The question is whether or not she is a fraud as well as a kook.
But whatever, you're allowed to believe what you like, and I'm allowed to read it for entertainment and maybe useful info, and wait until there is ACTUAL evidence that she is a fraud, not just a couple of dodgy webpages, before I go making a judgement on her.
By all means, read her for entertainment, but under no circumstances follow any of her advice.
The ECLIPSE will last 72 minutes.
72 coincides with 12 on the 6th clockface.
72 = 7+2 = 9
12 + 6 = 1+2+6 = 9
12 + 6 = 18 = 9 + 9 or reversed 9 x 9 = 81
or 6+6+6 = SICKS SICKS SICKS
The last occurrence of a LUNAR ECLIPSE coinciding with the Winter Solstice was 456 years ago.
456 = 4+5+6 = 15 = 1+5 = 6
The number 4 = Foursquare Foundation of the luciferian agenda
The number 4 = the number of the Lion King – Lincoln, etc.
The number 5 = the Sacrifice – Ba – the Soul
The number 6 = SICKS – the Sacrificer
The last occurrence of this Lunar phenomena occurred in 1554 AD
1554 = 1+5+5+4 = 15 = 1+5 = 6
1554 divided by 2 = 777
This event is purely mathematical and is the beginning of events which will occur during the year 2011.
originally posted by: DJW001
reply to post by LightAssassin
You have no idea what humanities best interests are.
I know that living in fear is not one of them.