It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eleven44
Okay, this is literally one of the first 'philosophical' questions I remember asking myself, even as a very young child (probably around 5 or 6.)
'How did all of this begin?'
I do believe in God now (and did as a young child too, although I have never been 'religious.)
So let's assume that, as the spiritual teachings go, God is Infinite. God has no beginning and no End. Time is an illusion. Physical reality is an illusion. All that ever has and ever will be is happening right Now.
Okay, cool. I can dig that.
BUT WHAT STARTED IT??
Originally posted by eleven44
I mean...how did 'God' come in to existence. And again, I know the rhetoric is 'God has no beginning and no End.' But seriously serious here, how is that possible? I don't believe our little human brains can grasp the idea.
But that has never stopped me from trying.
Okay, but then lets say 'God is not real. Only Science and Evolution are at play here.'
Okay, I could possibly get behind that too...but even still...WHAT STARTED IT??
I mean, the theory of Evolution is that everything evolves from something else. But what was THE FIRST 'thing?'
Originally posted by eleven44
The only answer that seems to come to me is something that our little human brains can't even grasp...yet it still is telling me,
"This is all illusion. You do not exist. Physical realms do not exist. God is All That Is."
But then....where did that 'truth' come from and how and why?
Originally posted by MamaJ
Could the chicken and egg not pop Into existence simultaneously?
Split from itself into two?
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Since we do know that at the quantum level that matter can just blink in and out of existence, what would happen to an entire universe that has collapsed in on itself down to the size of a quark or gluon?
I'm not aware of any evidence that "matter can just blink in and out of existence", but, even if that were the case, one can't apply quantum behaviour to macro scale phenomena. Even if the universe collapsed in on itself, it is the density that changes, not the component matter, so quantum behaviour does not apply.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Since we do know that at the quantum level that matter can just blink in and out of existence, what would happen to an entire universe that has collapsed in on itself down to the size of a quark or gluon?
I'm not aware of any evidence that "matter can just blink in and out of existence", but, even if that were the case, one can't apply quantum behaviour to macro scale phenomena. Even if the universe collapsed in on itself, it is the density that changes, not the component matter, so quantum behaviour does not apply.
I disagree, I think once it has reduced to a subatomic level it becomes more wave like, though dense, and can and did take on quantum behavior.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by MamaJ
Could the chicken and egg not pop Into existence simultaneously?
Split from itself into two?
Not split but all created at once....
They could, and that is kind of my point that since quantum particals can pop in and out of existence so could a universe that is at the quantum level too. As you suggest in this case the chicken, egg and the whole universe is all instantaneously be created or disappear into nothingness.
I personally see a beginning and end to our own universe though the idea of universes is infinite because time is not a part of the equation. Our universe popped into existence with infinite space/time in all directions, BUT with also all the matter of the universe at the size of a quark....the next 14 billion years that quark size universe has expanded into what we see today, but space/time for us is still infinite.
edit on 16-9-2012 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by adjensen
I'm not sure that you are understanding what I'm saying, or perhaps you don't understand physics -- "reduced to a subatomic level" is a nonsense statement. Matter is composed of atoms, so you can't change matter into subatomic particles, and even if you could compress it to be small enough to be comparable in size, it would not BE subatomic, because it would still be composed of atoms (which would be crunched closely together, but still atoms.)
Originally posted by MamaJ
Awesome, I see we are on the same page already!
Yay!!!!
Originally posted by MamaJ
I see this comcept above as God being the eternal thinker. In that sense, it makes perfect sense.
I'm not God. Are you? Do you think we are God and one in the same with all laws the same? No difference at all?
I see this concept as a goal whereas we don't think of god but with god. The ultimate goal for the soul is to think with him and not of him.
I'm still open though. It makes sense but not in the same sense as you make it? I hope I just made sense to you as it does to me. See?
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by MamaJ
Silence is the background to all being.
Imagine a tv screen before the picture appears - it is empty, silent and still.
When the picture, image (or noise) appears on the empty screen, the screen seems to disappear but the empty screen is always present.
You are the empty screen which is always present.
Emptiness is forming.
You are not noise, if you were you would not beable to hear noise.
Watch this short video to see how the thoughts cannot be silenced but how thoughts appear in silence.
youtu.be...
It may help with meditation.edit on 17-9-2012 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by Itisnowagain
Your words are very inspiring and I feel as though meditation is now needed. Just to reflect on the words.
It's a beautiful thing to live in the now.
Silence is not something I embrace but a beautiful melody within sings a beautiful song.
Being silenced isn't something my spirit is capable of, even in meditation.
Thoughts arise, controllling thoughts is what I enjoy doing while meditating.
To silence God is to stop all of creation...... I enjoy existing.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by adjensen
I'm not sure that you are understanding what I'm saying, or perhaps you don't understand physics -- "reduced to a subatomic level" is a nonsense statement. Matter is composed of atoms, so you can't change matter into subatomic particles, and even if you could compress it to be small enough to be comparable in size, it would not BE subatomic, because it would still be composed of atoms (which would be crunched closely together, but still atoms.)
I guess the question is if you smash atoms in on themselves, let's say a universe down to a quark, are we still talking atoms?
Originally posted by eleven44
Okay, this is literally one of the first 'philosophical' questions I remember asking myself, even as a very young child (probably around 5 or 6.)
'How did all of this begin?'
I mean, the theory of Evolution is that everything evolves from something else. But what was THE FIRST 'thing?'
The only answer that seems to come to me is something that our little human brains can't even grasp...yet it still is telling me,
"This is all illusion. You do not exist. Physical realms do not exist. God is All That Is."
But then....where did that 'truth' come from and how and why?
In the beginning there was nothing. Not even the truth of there being nothing. A literal absence of anything whatsoever.
Now, it would’ve been true that this void was nothing if this first of all truths had ever been established, but it hadn’t been. And as the sole pre-contextual qualification, Absolute Truth was the only possible means to establish this total absence of anything as being what nothing truly is, a definite, quantifiable concept with its own unique contextual identity. That could only be done by the logical determination of that existential absence as being, in truth, nothing.
When Absolute Logic revealed that ‘if there is nothing in existence, then nothing exists’ is true, Truth established nothing as the first qualified something to exist with a defined contextual relationship between itself and that which is – even if only as a potential concept – not it. That first achievement of inimitable identity was a specific instance of change; the first event to ever occur.
The absence of anything had become the true existence of nothing; a change that resulted in the fact of that change to physically emerge as a unit cluster of information, which also established the truth that an event (any change from what was to what is) creates information; a new fact that, then, also emerged as information. As a result of this first change, the fact of physical existence – in the form of eternal information – was now true, and as an established fact with no change in status logically possible, it would remain true forever.
The eternal nature of the physical fact required Truth’s definitive qualification – Absolute Reality – to now physically exist as a permanent contextual standard, making all subsequent information clusters now directly comparable as true or untrue upon emergence; Logic’s first imposition of existential order. This established the physical basis for the contextual environment, with Reality– the factual result of Truth and Logic – completing the conceptual Trinity of Absolutes. And upon this foundation, physical existence would then emerge and progressively develop as a symbiotic relationship between the Event (change) and Information (fact of change).
excerpt- TAKING DOWN THE CURTAIN: The Truth About Faith, Fact, and the Slippery Wizards of Voodoo Metaphysics