It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


There May Be No Anti-Islamic Movie At All........

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Sep, 16 2012 @ 02:34 PM
reply to post by Stormdancer777

Of course thats what they believe. Their whole country revolves around religion and they dont seem to grasp that here in America, we dont give a rats rear about religion being a basis of our lives. They should also realize there are MILLIONS of Americans who have no clue this film even exists.

posted on Sep, 16 2012 @ 02:44 PM
reply to post by stupid girl

The US and Israel, Not Iran, Threaten Peace:

It is not easy to escape from one’s skin, to see the world differently from the way it is presented to us day after day. But it is useful to try. Let’s take a few examples.

The war drums are beating ever more loudly over Iran. Imagine the situation to be reversed.

Iran is carrying out a murderous and destructive low-level war against Israel with great-power participation. Its leaders announce that negotiations are going nowhere. Israel refuses to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty and allow inspections, as Iran has done. Israel continues to defy the overwhelming international call for a nuclear-weapons-free zone in the region. Throughout, Iran enjoys the support of its superpower patron.

Iranian leaders are therefore announcing their intention to bomb Israel, and prominent Iranian military analysts report that the attack may happen before the U.S. elections.

Iran can use its powerful air force and new submarines sent by Germany, armed with nuclear missiles and stationed off the coast of Israel. Whatever the timetable, Iran is counting on its superpower backer to join if not lead the assault. U.S. defense secretary Leon Panetta says that while we do not favor such an attack, as a sovereign country Iran will act in its best interests.

All unimaginable, of course, though it is actually happening, with the cast of characters reversed. True, analogies are never exact, and this one is unfair – to Iran.

Like its patron, Israel resorts to violence at will. It persists in illegal settlement in occupied territory, some annexed, all in brazen defiance of international law and the U.N. Security Council. It has repeatedly carried out brutal attacks against Lebanon and the imprisoned people of Gaza, killing tens of thousands without credible pretext.

Thirty years ago Israel destroyed an Iraqi nuclear reactor, an act that has recently been praised, avoiding the strong evidence, even from U.S. intelligence, that the bombing did not end Saddam Hussein’s nuclear weapons program but rather initiated it. Bombing of Iran might have the same effect.

Iran too has carried out aggression – but during the past several hundred years, only under the U.S.-backed regime of the shah, when it conquered Arab islands in the Persian Gulf.

Iran engaged in nuclear development programs under the shah, with the strong support of official Washington. The Iranian government is brutal and repressive, as are Washington’s allies in the region. The most important ally, Saudi Arabia, is the most extreme Islamic fundamentalist regime, and spends enormous funds spreading its radical Wahhabist doctrines elsewhere. The gulf dictatorships, also favored U.S. allies, have harshly repressed any popular effort to join the Arab Spring.

The Nonaligned Movement – the governments of most of the world’s population – is now meeting in Teheran. The group has vigorously endorsed Iran’s right to enrich uranium, and some members – India, for example – adhere to the harsh U.S. sanctions program only partially and reluctantly.

The NAM delegates doubtless recognize the threat that dominates discussion in the West, lucidly articulated by Gen. Lee Butler, former head of the U.S. Strategic Command: “It is dangerous in the extreme that in the cauldron of animosities that we call the Middle East,” one nation should arm itself with nuclear weapons, which “inspires other nations to do so.”

Butler is not referring to Iran, but to Israel, which is regarded in the Arab countries and in Europe as posing the greatest threat to peace In the Arab world, the United States is ranked second as a threat, while Iran, though disliked, is far less feared. Indeed in many polls majorities hold that the region would be more secure if Iran had nuclear weapons to balance the threats they perceive.

If Iran is indeed moving toward nuclear-weapons capability – this is still unknown to U.S. intelligence – that may be because it is “inspired to do so” by the U.S.-Israeli threats, regularly issued in explicit violation of the U.N. Charter.

Why then is Iran the greatest threat to world peace, as seen in official Western discourse? The primary reason is acknowledged by U.S. military and intelligence and their Israeli counterparts: Iran might deter the resort to force by the United States and Israel.

Furthermore Iran must be punished for its “successful defiance,” which was Washington’s charge against Cuba half a century ago, and still the driving force for the U.S. assault against Cuba that continues despite international condemnation.

Other events featured on the front pages might also benefit from a different perspective. Suppose that Julian Assange had leaked Russian documents revealing important information that Moscow wanted to conceal from the public, and that circumstances were otherwise identical.

posted on Sep, 16 2012 @ 03:55 PM

The movie does exist and it's a piece of sh*t.

Ok I'll contribute a bit more.

The only conspiracy here is that there was an extremely terrible film produced (not terrible because of content, but because of production/post production value) and was taken advantage of (like many Muslim demonstrators) by certain Muslim individuals to get many others angry enough to commit acts of aggressive nature against Western targets.

That's what happened.

Also, I know I'll get slack for this but you can actually read about the project here Link

edit on 16-9-2012 by SeventhSeal because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 16 2012 @ 04:04 PM
reply to post by SeventhSeal

Boy that WIKI showed up quick. Perfect replay of the media "official story" too.

Film... No_Other_Reason.

Just chastising the "story", not you SeventhSeal.

posted on Sep, 16 2012 @ 04:14 PM
reply to post by intrptr

Usually when there's an event regarding something, it gets put up on Wiki. Also, the photo of the promotional poster was taken by a Current TV's producer when the film screened back in the spring.

Also, read about it here: Link

The film's intentional purpose was to INSTIGATE and of course, to scam viewers and curious ones.

It's just a really bad movie taken advantage by pissed off Muslims who are not fans of our foreign policy.

That's that.

posted on Sep, 16 2012 @ 04:16 PM

Originally posted by TheToastmanCometh
reply to post by Druscilla

Us Hindus would rather keep the fighting in India.

Until a lot of Hindus moved to Surrey (BC, Canada) and imported that violent culture with it.
I don't mean to 'target' you or your people's but it is the truth. Lot's of East Indian gangs here.

posted on Sep, 16 2012 @ 04:40 PM
reply to post by yourmaker

All the Hindus I've encountered in the UK are good people.

posted on Sep, 16 2012 @ 04:50 PM

Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by yourmaker

All the Hindus I've encountered in the UK are good people.

I've met a lot of good East Indians as well. Friends of mine.

But what i'm saying is that there are a lot of East indian street gangs, and they are publicly violent.

There are gangs of all kinds here, we even have a well known gang called the UN gang made up of all races.

But what i'm talking about is like a thousand plus Hindus who would beat the crap out of you for many reasons. They took the black culture and fused it with their own. They think they are hardcore gangsters.

luckily for the most part, they are stay within their own communities so the violence is civil between them.
but when I was in highschool about 6 years ago, different times man. I learned how to defend myself.
Racism is like engrained into their culture and community here and in turn i've been forced to pre judge people to determine whether or not I can even say hello to someone of their ethnicity.

posted on Sep, 16 2012 @ 09:20 PM

Originally posted by Druscilla
I, for one, am sick, sick, sick of the thin skinned reactionary nonsense that ensues every time some book like
Salman Rushdie's Satanic Verses, cartoons depicting Muhammad like the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, the current ridiculous tantrum that's being thrown over a movie, and others voluntarily censoring themselves like the South Park censoring of Muhammed due concern goes on because of cultural intolerance.

This tip-toeing around some other culture's intolerant sensitivities need stop.
Sensitivity training and tolerance needs be taught world wide.

Some Christians were up in arms over the graphic depictions and some controversial choices in the Mel Gibson Jesus Chainsaw Massacre film, but, I'm pretty certain riots didn't ensue.

Hindus aren't going to have a coronary if you make a joke about Krishna, or Ganesh.
Buddhists aren't going to get all stabby or call for holy war if you blow up historical depictions of some of the largest Statues of Buddha that are/were culturally significant worldwide.

This whole nonsense is boggling.

edit on 15-9-2012 by Druscilla because: (no reason given) probably has a whole lot more to do with the last thousand years of repeated invasions and interventionism by Europe and the States.

posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 03:46 AM
it just makes them look really really stupid.... Going all nutz because of such a lame video.. Some noob made a stupid vid and now they go all crazy....

posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 08:30 PM
reply to post by stupid girl

Starred and flagged OP !

top topics

<< 1  2  3   >>

log in