It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The man purported to be the filmmaker behind an inflammatory anti-Islam video being blamed for sparking violent unrest in the Middle East and North Africa was escorted by deputies from his Cerritos, Calif., home shortly after midnight Saturday morning, NBCLosAngles.com reported.
Media and law enforcement had been staking out the home at the end of a cul de sac in the Southern California city for about 48 hours when the man emerged wearing a coat, hat, scarf and glasses.
L.A. County Sherrif’s Department spokesman Steve Whitmore confirmed to NBCLA that Nakoula was taken to the Cerritos sheriff’s station for interviewing by federal probation officers aimed at determining whether he violated the terms of his 5-year probation by uploading a video to the Internet.
Originally posted by Gridrebel
Maybe they didn't want to cause a scene or have a riot break out.
In 2009, he was indicted for a $860 bank fraud
They claim he went of his own free will. But I highly doubt it. Most Americans don't understand that if a cop comes to the door and says 'we are taking you downtown for questioning' .. you don't have to go. Only if you are under arrest do you have to go. I have no doubt they leaned on him.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by FlyersFan
They claim he went of his own free will. But I highly doubt it. Most Americans don't understand that if a cop comes to the door and says 'we are taking you downtown for questioning' .. you don't have to go. Only if you are under arrest do you have to go. I have no doubt they leaned on him.
He could be feeling quite guilty at the moment and decided it was best to cooperate.
As far as the video, yes he had the right to make and post the video to youtube...but with every right comes responsibility. Given the current social/political environment in which we live, anyone could see that the video would be very controversial and it was most likely made for that specific purpose.
So while I stand up for his right to free speech, I condemn his stupid logic in posting the video at all and he deserves a smack in the mouth for being a dumbass.
Edit ti add: I am trying to find some more information, but I believe he may have been banned from posting stuff on the internet due to his convictions.edit on 15-9-2012 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)
Offense cannot be given, it can only be taken.
If responsibility came with free speech, then probably 80% of all youtube clips sould be removed. They are mostly dumb, unfunny, un-cute, and a total waste of time.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by jiggerj
If responsibility came with free speech, then probably 80% of all youtube clips sould be removed. They are mostly dumb, unfunny, un-cute, and a total waste of time.
Dumb or unfunny is a little bit different than specifically making a film to inflame a group of people.
Although I can only speculate, I have no doubt that this man made this video and released it with the direct intent to get Muslims riled-up.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Dumb or unfunny is a little bit different than specifically making a film to inflame a group of people.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Although we have certain rights granted to us by the constitution, we have to use those rights responsibly and not exploit those rights to poke the chests of groups of people that are already on the edge of the societal abyss.
I hope I was a bit clearer this time.
The quote above is an unworkable governance standard. It is NOT the responsibility of the State to protect you from mere offense.