Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by HamrHeed
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Everyone is messing it up. "Lucifer" appears one time, it's a terrible Latin rendering of the Hebrew "Heylel ben Sachar" from Isaiah 14:12. Heylel ben Sachar doesn't mean "bringer of light", it means "crescent moon and star". In Arabic "hilel" is also "crescent moon", both Arabic and Hebrew are Semitic languages. Where Jerome messed up is the moon BEARS the light, or reflects the light of the sun. The moon has no capacity to produce it's own light.
Morning Star is a title Christ reserves for Himself in Revelation. Satan's name never was "Lucifer" before he fell, it was "Heylel".
So this is where the term "moon god" comes from?
There is nothing new under the Sun.. In Isaiah 14:12 God is condemning "Heylel ben Sachar", not the Latin "Lucifer". Isaiah was written in Hebrew, not Latin. Jerome translated the Vulgate from the LXX, not the Hebrew.
"Crescent moon and star".
So these "pagan" associations and celebrations were the root or the subject of the new living word?
Do you believe we will have another sun?
edit: Sorry I am not trying to piss you off with my responses. I find your responses to be very interesting and sometimes cryptic
edit on
15-9-2012 by HamrHeed because: (no reason given)


