Do you believe in Guardian Angels? Possible proof in video.

reply to post by arpgme


I could agree with you.

Did anyone else notice how the bystanders in the street magically appear at .18sec.
along with a quick bright flash?

reply to post by snc24
yea I cropped it for better acertation? Your point?

reply to post by proob4


Show me where i say other dimensions do not exist Mr. Wizard..I think i just said in my previous post that quantum physics state more than 3 exist, up to 11 actually..You need glasses or a timeout from the internet

reply to post by jhill76

I use the word he, because of the ease of use in speaking in human standards. His standards of good are known to all who knows.

Hmm, in terms of human standards, the he should be a she. A world ruled by women would be a World with less war and aggression.

True to an extent, some are required to know as to keep the balance in a subtle way.

There wouldn't be a need for a requirement for some people to know though, as every person is responsible for their own actions in life. For that or those people to 'know', they'd be swayed into correcting their behaviour due to the 'knowing', where as the ordinary person would act to their true self. The when judgement comes, if that is the case the ones that have been true to themselves are the ones that aren't in the know.

To me the right way all comes down to love, not the word but emotion.
The opposite being hate.

But that is just one persons individual take on this big question.

There as so many people who think they are right.

Still no one explains how a truck that size, moving that fast, comes to a stop almost on a dime. Ever hear of this thing called inertia? It's kind of a physical law

reply to post by Tykonos

Hmm, in terms of human standards, the he should be a she. A world ruled by women would be a World with less war and aggression.

This is the current setup as man has decided to run it, not Father.

There wouldn't be a need for a requirement for some people to know though, as every person is responsible for their own actions in life. For that or those people to 'know', they'd be swayed into correcting their behaviour due to the 'knowing', where as the ordinary person would act to their true self. The when judgement comes, if that is the case the ones that have been true to themselves are the ones that aren't in the know.

The ones who know will not go through judgement.

To me the right way all comes down to love, not the word but emotion. The opposite being hate.

This is correct!

There as so many people who think they are right.

There are a few here, who truly know.

reply to post by TheLonewolf


I don't know where i am a wizard? You cliamed you knew physics, I never claimed I knew wizardry??

Originally posted by jhill76
reply to post by Tykonos

 

Only what we can feel from first hand experience can be appreciated or accepted as knowing what that experience actually felt like.

This is why many do not believe.

Then who is teasing us?

reply to post by jhill76


Having faith is believing in something you can't prove.

Angel of God, my gaurdian dear,
To whom God's love commits you here,
Ever this night, be at my side,
To rule, and gaurd,
To light, and love.

Amen

I believe we all have gaurdian angels, first prayer I learned as a youngster.

Miracles happen every day, it's not for us to understand His plans for each of us.

reply to post by TheLonewolf
It's "enertia" not inertia Mr physics. And it all depends on the pavement, speed, humidity, elasticity of the rubber to pavent, weight of vehicle and the quality of the "rubber" of the tires.

The "Wizard"
"I kinda like that"

reply to post by proob4


You still didn't answer the fundamental question..Where do i state that other dimensions do not exist..

reply to post by Happy1

Having faith is believing in something you can't prove.

This is correct, why do you think I think otherwise?

Being religious is following mans view of God.

reply to post by Tykonos

Then who is teasing us?

I am not aware of that in which you speak?

reply to post by TheLonewolf
I never stated that you did? I only explained that there was and it could be conceptualized in the OP video.

reply to post by proob4


dictionary.reference.com/browse/inertia

There you go Mr. Wizard...You can't possibly be this dumb, right?..I done with your obviously uneducated ass

reply to post by TheLonewolf
Ok energy = enertia. Why the name calling with the ass comment? For real man!
Hey i made a honest mistake mr physics.

reply to post by jhill76

This is the current setup as man has decided to run it, not Father.

Man has oppressed women for years through physical strength. Only today are women becoming more equal.
So 'he' is just a term of phrase to address the one?

The ones who know will not go through judgement.

They are without fault or blame?

There are a few here, who truly know.

How? You must admit there are many, many a person in this World who claim to 'know' the truth and will swear by it whilst calling all others liars or deceived. What makes you more right thatn that of a fellow believer who follows a different path. Both of your convictions are the same.

reply to post by Tykonos

So 'he' is just a term of phrase to address the one?

Just a phrase when speaking here to address Father.

They are without fault or blame?

Correct.

How? You must admit there are many, many a person in this World who claim to 'know' the truth and will swear by it whilst calling all others liars or deceived. What makes you more right thatn that of a fellow believer who follows a different path. Both of your convictions are the same.

Father will confirm this for the person that is asking, this is your proof. Another cannot make a testimony about himself otherwise it will not be valid.

Different paths to the same source is not wrong or right, it just is.

reply to post by Tykonos


Maybe it's cause there are few who truly know?