It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
$200,000 in California will not go nearly as far as it would in the rest of the country.
Originally posted by Q33323
I know lots of folk who have a family income in that range. They are certainly not "living large." It depends on where you live. That amount in jerk-water Nevada would be fine. In San Francisco, $200k, for a family of four, might qualify you for food stamps.
You can barely make it on $100k these days... anywhere.
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by SaturnFX
We are not talking about exceptions (single people). We are talking about the average which would be a family.
Originally posted by RELDDIR
Does anyone here have an inkling about what the Federal Reserve is about do? Inflation? Anyone?
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
... if you cant live comfortably on 100k a year maybe its you who is the problem
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by free_form
Another poster broke that amount of money down for us based on where they live. Could you please do that for us based on a family of four living in San Francisco? Here is the current median home price for you:
3 bedrooms $760,000
link
Let's assume this family has one car payment. Don't forget to include the cost of healthcare since they will soon be mandated to buy it.
edit on 15-9-2012 by MsAphrodite because: (no reason given)
I know you dispute what President Clinton said and what the Democrats that say that you’re going to have a $2,000 tax hike on middleclass families. I know you dispute that. You cite your own studies. But one of the studies you cite by Martin Feldstein at Harvard shows that to make your math work, it could work, if you eliminate the home mortgage, charity, and state and local tax deductions for everyone earning over $100,000. Is that what you propose?