I believe he is on track with this, but i'll watch the video, and edit my reply. On Youtube, Creo Harmony is the one who is taking the knowledge of Roger Elvick and showing how to apply it. (Original Redemption)

I can agree with everything up to about 4 minutes into it. I'm not sure where he gets this Live Birth Record business. I have not heard of this, and certainly Roger would not recommend it. But up to that point, he is 100% on target, IMO. Now to watch the rest.

At 5:14 seconds, he admits he has only been learning this over the last 3 months, so Santos is not the person to learn from, but someone to listen to. Check out Creo Harmony on youtube, and "Claiming your Court Case" as your property. That is what I believe to be the most progressive front in Redemption, today. Also, of course, Winston Shrout is modeled about 80% after Roger Elvick's teachings. Everyone else is someone to listen to, but not to learn from. Jordan Maxwell picked up on this early, right at the time I did, around 1999, when Roger first broke this info to the world. Him and Vic worked together and along with another sovereign whose name escapes me, who wrote Cracking the Code...those guys were taking Roger Elvicks info and distorting it to make money off the book, and then Jordan found out he was being conned and broke off ties with them both.

Winston Shrout was the one who emerged from the whole ordeal and kept as close to Roger's teachings as possible. Sam Kennedy and Sam Davis, and Ron Lutz were all bad attempts at taking Roger's info and making a "product" from it. And they all paid for that, too.

Now, I think Creo Harmony is working hard as bringing this to light. She has knowledge of how to use the "Closed accounts" Roger spoke of, and uses, and nobody understands.

At 10:40, when he tells you what to ask the judge, you have to be real careful. There are all kinds of questions one could ask. Just remember to never answer their questions, with anything but a question. And know when to act, when to speak, when it's your turn. One simple question may do nothing to phase the judge, but a barrage of similar questions can get their attention.

Just a couple of quick comments.

1) Get a free consultation with an attorney first. Call your State Bar Association to find out about it.

2) If it's a serious matter, do not follow the video. One of three things will happen. You may be sent for a psychiatric exam, you may be charged with contempt, you may be ignored. You will certainly irritate everyone involved and that's not a good position for a defendant to be in.

3) If it's a very minor matter, I suppose you could roll the dice and hope that the judge says: "I don't get paid enough to listen to loonies like this, tear up his lousy $25 ticket and kick him out of here." But as I say, it's a gamble. You could end up worse off.

Be really careful, get serious legal advice.

Originally posted by charles1952
Just a couple of quick comments.

1) Get a free consultation with an attorney first. Call your State Bar Association to find out about it.

2) If it's a serious matter, do not follow the video. One of three things will happen. You may be sent for a psychiatric exam, you may be charged with contempt, you may be ignored. You will certainly irritate everyone involved and that's not a good position for a defendant to be in.

3) If it's a very minor matter, I suppose you could roll the dice and hope that the judge says: "I don't get paid enough to listen to loonies like this, tear up his lousy $25 ticket and kick him out of here." But as I say, it's a gamble. You could end up worse off.

Be really careful, get serious legal advice.

FIRE your attorney, and kick his BRITISH ACCREDITED REGISTRY (BAR) ASS out of town!
How do you expect to get justice from the Crown?

OK, I can see there's going to be a real disagreement here. Let me ask any of you to find any evidence that US attoneys are in this "British Accredited Registry." If you can't (and I certainly wasn't) then don't listen to this guy. My only purpose is to save your skin by having you avoid a serious mistake.

Besides, if this worked, I can guarantee you that defense lawyers all across the country would know of it by now, and would be raking in big bucks by defending clients with it.

Originally posted by charles1952
OK, I can see there's going to be a real disagreement here. Let me ask any of you to find any evidence that US attoneys are in this "British Accredited Registry." If you can't (and I certainly wasn't) then don't listen to this guy. My only purpose is to save your skin by having you avoid a serious mistake.

Besides, if this worked, I can guarantee you that defense lawyers all across the country would know of it by now, and would be raking in big bucks by defending clients with it.

You cannot use your own hand for bait!
Lawyers are NOT ALLOWED to use this. That is what the BAR is for, to BAR them from the "Private" side, and keep them reigned in the "Public" side of the "Trust".

It bothers me that people are this stupid. Where do people come up with this crap?

Completely wrong...you'll just have more Lawyer BS
The lawyer (liar) is your worst enemy, and the worst kind of enemy to the Republic.

Originally posted by phroziac
It bothers me that people are this stupid. Where do people come up with this crap?

I hear you, this guys full of crap.

That judge is going to find your dumb ass in contempt of court
and throw you in the slammer.

this stuff isnt even slick

The IRS collects the debt from the employees and strawmen, but they are collecting the interest FOR the creditors. If you identify yourself as an employee, and not an employer, you are the one who owes the tax, otherwise, YOU are the one they are collecting the tax for.

In court, they are collecting revenue in BANKRUPTCY from the debtors, not the creditors, or the beneficiaries of the Trust. How do you identify yourself as one of those debtors?

Hire a Lawyer, defend the charges, and fight the debt.

How do you Identify yourself as one of the Creditors?
Accept for Value, the charges, claim them as your Property in your own accounts, question the validity of the Claim and supposed "claimholders".

What is happening in court?

The Corporation which is dead and cannot be injured, cannot have a valid claim, so therefore the corporation uses "charges" and they are entirely for the Employees. Code violations are Employee responsibilities.

You are presented with Charges. These "Charges" are nothing more than an "information" given which is held by the "claimant". The information is used to quantify a value of debt for the account or "incident". You are charged with 3 counts of Felonious activity but in reality you are Presented with 3 Accounts which have your strawman's name as the Debtor on them. When you do not accept the charges for value, and sign and pay them right then and there, you are held in "Dishonor" of that debt, and who is holding the bond on the account at that point?

YOUR LAWYER, the BONDED ONE, who can hold the charges against you! The Attorney is the one who sells you down the river!

What you need to do is call a witness to the stand, The Attorney, and ask him if he is holding the bond?
Make him testify to it, to prove it to yourself, if you want to. The courtroom will clear faster than you can say, WOW!

When you Accept the account, then they are supposed to settle it and close it for you. What rogue judges and lawyers do is they hold it in Suspension Accounts, while they hold you in jail to try to intimidate you, usually for no longer than 72 hours. Why do they release you sometimes after 72 hours? That is the time for Truth in Lending, another commercial or commerce rule.