posted on Sep, 13 2012 @ 03:17 PM
Thank you Caroline Glick for clearing the air.
Here are a couple of facts:
On June 4 the White House confirmed that the US had killed Abu Yahya Al-Libi - OBL's Libyan lietenant who had moved into Al Qaeda's #2 spot after
Ayman Zahawiri after the Navy SEALs whacked OBL.
On Tuesday 9/11, a tape was released of Zawahiri announcing that Libi had been killed earlier this year by a US drone attack. The Zawahiri tape was
made during Ramadan which ended in the middle of last month. Zawahiri called for his terrorist underlings to avenge Libi's death and especially
exhorted Libyans to take revenge.
The attack in Libya was well planned and executed. It wasn't about a spontaneous protest against some ridiculous internet movie of Muhammad. The
assailants came armed to the teeth, with among other things, RPG 7s. They knew that the US Ambassador was in Benghazi rather than Tripoli. They knew
how to track his movements, and were able to strike against him after he and his colleagues left the consulate building and tried to flee in a car. As
Israel Channel 2's Arab Affairs Correspondent Ehud Yaari noted this evening, you don't often see well trained terrorists participating in protests
Then there is the attack in Cairo. They were led by Mohammad Zawahiri - Ayman Zawahiri's brother. According the Thomas Josclyn in the Weekly
Standard, the US media has been idiotically presenting him as some sort of moderate despite the fact that in an interview with Al Jazeerah he said
said, "We in al Qaeda..."
Egypt's US supported Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi recently released Zawahiri from Egyptian prison. The same Barack Obama who has no
time in his schedule to meet with Prime Minister Netanyahu next week in New York, is scheduled to meet Morsi.
The Egyptian government has not condemned the attack on the US Embassy in Cairo. But Morsi is demanding that the US government prosecute the film's
You may be wondering how some movie no one's heard of has caused such a hullabaloo. Well, as it turns out, the film was screened on an Egyptian
Salafist television channel. Obviously the Salafists -- many of whom, like Zawahiri were released from prison by Morsi, wanted to stir up anti-US
violence on the eve of 9/11. So if the film is responsible for the violence, a finger needs to be pointed to its chief distributor -- Al Qaida's
Egyptian friends and members.
With these facts in hand, it is clear that the attempts to present these acts of war against the US as the consequence of some stupid nothing movie
are obscene attempts to deflect the blame for these unwarranted attacks onto their victims and away from their perpetrators.
Anyone who thinks Egypt will remain on good terms with either the US - who ironically helped the Islamist government get into power - or Israel,
understands nothing about the ideology of the Muslim brotherhood.
As many have noted, nobody knew about the video, so how did it become such a big deal so quickly?? Apparently the Egyptian authorities decided to
screen it on public TV, giving the radical masses good reason to storm the US embassy. Why? Why do they want to incite the masses? Perhaps to threaten
US-Egyptian relations? To create a stir within the region of anti-americanism? Of perhaps drilling in the idea in the Islamic world that the west
opposes Islam as much as Islam opposes the west?
On a deeper note, what is this nonsense being preached about CIA, Mossad, etc when the proof is in the pudding - it was EGYPT - and the ISLAMISTS who
engineered this fiasco; and the US media in it's whitewashing the exact details of what actually happened - blaming a video for the murder of the
ambassador to Libya and hiding the fact of it being an organized reprisal for the assassination of Al Qaeda's second in command, further implicates
the US liberal media in yet another instance of extenuating the threat Islamism poses to the west.