It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us Initiates of the high degree, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine: If Lucifer where not God, would Adonay (sic) whose deeds prove his cruelty, perfidy, and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests culminate him? . . .
. . . Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary for light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the state . . .
Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil. (pg 217)
May I remind you Masons that Solomon, whose knowledge you claim to possess (no pun intended), had the knowledge of controlling demons with which he used to build his great temple.
Originally posted by BrianG
Well I kept reading crazy posts about masons NOT being Christian so I came across this as proof some MUST be Christian hence not devil worshipers
Originally posted by GreatOwl
So, not everyone who claims to be a Christian is actually a Christian. But anyone can determine who is "NOT" a true Christian by reading the scripture and making note of all the things Christians are supposed to do, then comparing those written things with the actual activities of those claiming Christian Faith as their own.
Originally posted by FriedBabelBroccoli
Perhaps not Satan, but rather Lucifer, or his positive side Adonay;
Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us Initiates of the high degree, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine: If Lucifer where not God, would Adonay (sic) whose deeds prove his cruelty, perfidy, and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests culminate him? . . .
. . . Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary for light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the state . . .
Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil. (pg 217)
The above quotes are from the Taxil Hoax. WHy do you continue to use this as a reference?
The otehr quotes were addressed by Ksig.
Originally posted by FriedBabelBroccoli
For the Initiates, this [Satan] is not a Person, but a Force, created for good, which which may serve for evil, It is the instrument of Liberty or Free Will . . . They represent this Force which presides over the physical generation, under the mythological and horned form of the God PAN; . . . thence came the he-goat of the Sabbat, brother of the Ancient Serpent, and the Light-bearer or Phosphor, of which the poets have made the false Lucifer of the legend. (pg 200)
The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us Initiates of the high degree, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine: If Lucifer where not God, would Adonay (sic) whose deeds prove his cruelty, perfidy, and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests culminate him? . . .
. . . Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary for light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the state . . .
Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil. (pg 217)
This pathetic cop out ('the Devil made me do it'. 'he/she was possssed') completely undermines free will. We have the ability to choose for ourselves, when we start ascribing our actions to some mythical monesense then we really do have strange degeneracy lunacy happaening in our culture.
You asked for a Jewish Sage, I gave you a Jewish Sage. It is not my problem that you do not happen to agree with the one I quoted. You outlined parameters, I fulfilled them.
'Evidence' in the Bible? Really? The Bible is not a history book, nor is it a footnoted compilation of observable phenomenom. It is an anecdotal collection of moral and philosophical lessons. When people start taking the entire thing literally is where we run into issues of intellectual bankruptcy.
It is an allegorical lesson, not a literal one, this is quite obvious in the Degrees.
Just because some nudnik writes a book the he exercised demons does not make it true.
Maybe you're not reading your Torah properly? Both Exodus and Deuteronomy make the purpose of the Sabbath quite clear (the only one named in the actual Commandments): Observe and remember. Try Deuteronomy 5:12 and 5:15, and Exodus 20:8 and 20:11, and especially 31:11-15. The key is in understanding the word melachah. This is how to understand what constitutes work on the Sabbath. No need to look outside the Torah.
The Torah also expressly tells you where to bind your tefillin. You will find everything you need in there, again in Exodus (13:9 for example) and in Deuteronomy (11:18 for example). Any ritualistic complication of this act is only man-made, hence Talmudic.
So, if you stick with the textbook you get all your answers. You just have to learn how to read it first.
Now, could you at least link me to your prior post on the morphemes? It's a simple question, and if you can't answer it twice, at least save me the trouble of having to search out your answer within your other posts.
Originally posted by shamanix2012
Screwed up is not the term for that family, I have my reasons to believe they were deeply involved in the occult, they tried to use it on me, had me gaslighted, call it what you want witchcraft ? satanic ? all I know is that it spooked the hell out of me and it was draining my soul. She was incapable of loving even her own children and her only strength was to turn everyone around her against each other in order to be in control. Now to me,if there ever was an evil force in this world, it would work in these ways. I'm not blaming masons, but every part of society, every group has the potential for corruption in some of their ranks, not just masons.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by r2d246
Not like what you see on tv or movies. He explains that it's just an addiction one gets to blood once they reach very high levels of satanism and they have to choose that.
Outrageous? Of course not. Demon possession is so normal, why, I think you have one, and it caused you to post a wall of text. It seems to be an anti-paragraphical demon of the highest order.
Ha I like that one
[
Originally posted by CookieMonster09
The possessed person doesn't necessarily recognize that they are possessed. They may not even complain that "The Devil made me do it". They also have no medical condition. The matter is entirely spiritual warfare.
You gave quotes from Jewish Sages that support my position that Satan was an Angel.
You comically give quotes thinking they support your position, when they support mine. You either cannot read your own quotes you posted, or you have a hilarious sense of humor. Either way, you lost the argument, my friend. Nice try, though - It was fun to see you make a fool of yourself.
Not a history book? Huh? The Bible is replete with historical references. Observable phenomenon? Spoken like a true secularist.
The building of Solomon's temple is biblical.
No, these are credible authors with their reputations at stake. These are people - such as Fr. Malachi Martin - that have quite a pedigree of theological training and education.
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by GreatOwl
So, not everyone who claims to be a Christian is actually a Christian. But anyone can determine who is "NOT" a true Christian by reading the scripture and making note of all the things Christians are supposed to do, then comparing those written things with the actual activities of those claiming Christian Faith as their own.
Well, by your information, I have only witnessed about three true Christians in my lifetime.
And none on this site. But in a strange way I do agree with you.
LEWIS, OR LouvrrnAu. The words Lewis and Louveteau, which, in their original meanings, import two very different things, have in Masonry an equivalent signification...
the son of a Mason is in England called a lewis,...
The learned reader will also recollect that in the Greek language /alms signifies both the sun and a wolf. Hence, as the can didate in the Isiac mysteries was called a wolf, the son of a Freemason in the French lodges is called a young wolf or a louvetutu. The louveteau in France, like the lewis in England, is invested with peculiar privileges He also is permitted to unite himself with the order at the early age of eighteen years.
That would seem to be the necessary condition for there to be Christians who are also Masons.
Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to post by GreatOwl
Where have we referred to ourselves as "wolves"?
French Freemasonry is grey area, but maybe you could cite Masonic literature.
That would seem to be the necessary condition for there to be Christians who are also Masons.
Except these two religions believe in two different Abrahamic lineages.
No matter how you try to 'logically' explain it I am still going to find demon possession to be completely nonesensical and rather absurd in its premise.
And Jewish beliefs are that all angels are part of God so what is the issue?
So now Rambam, who you decried as not a good source to use because of his contemporaries view of him, suddenly supports you? Let me see if I understand, when I quote him to support my point he is not worthy, yet you use the same quote to support your point and he is suddenly legitimate. Seems someone else is behaving foolishly.
Oh, I am sure it is replete with historical references, like demon-casting and Satan/demon belief.
And again, not all stories in the Bible are true.
Reputation at stake from what? Do you honestly think outside the clergy that an Exorcist is some sort of legitimate occupation? This is a role used to sucker the distressed and take advantage of them, they are snake oil salesmen clothed in albs.
As I said, any ritualistic complications of the clear instructions given in your Torah are man-made and completely unnecessary. Do you think he spent time communing with your God in order to discuss how to interpret these already clear instructions, only to then omit them from the written Law? I don't think so.
What do the actual morphemes mean, when placed within the context of the story itself? It's OK to repeat yourself - I have had to do so numerous times in this discussion with you.
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by GreatOwl
Could you explain your position a bit?
A tribe used a wolf as their logo. And since they predated Freemasonry, masons are wolves?
See, I need a bit of help here.