It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SUBKONCIOUS
You see, Hall discovered many masonic secrets without having to get his hand held through the masonic process..
Ultimately... Lucifer, in the appropriate context related to secret societies and masonry, is a form of symbolism that stands for knowledge.. It has nothing to do with being an evil devil worshiper..
Which your own sources repudiate as evidenced by the quotes that codyoutlaw and myself linked. The Biblical Hebrews did not believe that Satan (big 's') was a being, they believed ha-satan (small 's') was a job and that job was directed by God.
That is exactly what I and they would tell you. They do not believe in Satan.
It follows quite well. It would really help if you understood the Hebrew translation prior to accusing me of misleading people. That was a rather profound error that you could have avoided.
Originally posted by CookieMonster09
You have offered no Jewish or theological source as refutation.
Please show me anywhere that the Jewish Sages deny that Satan came in the guise of a sentient human being to wrestle with Jacob in the Book of Genesis. I am all ears.
So, you mean to tell me that Orthodox Jews, who refer to Satan every night in their night time prayers, have no conceptual understanding of Satan? You would have us believe that they borrowed the term, "Satan", from Christianity and then adopted that term into their bedtime prayers? This is laughable, my friend!
Ask the Orthodox Rabbi - Jewish Beliefs and Laws - Torah and Talmud
Orthodox Rabbi Ari Enkin provides halachic answers to questions about the Jewish beliefs and laws as provided in the Torah (Hebrew Bible) and Talmud.
Do Jews Believe in Satan?
Satan is a character that appears in the belief systems of many religions, including Christianity and Islam. In Judaism "satan" is not a sentient being but a metaphor for the evil inclination – the yetzer hara – that exists in every person and tempts us to do wrong.
References to "satan" can be found in some Orthodox and Conservative prayer books, but they are viewed as symbolic descriptions of one aspect of mankind's nature.source
You are spreading misinformation in this thread.
The term used in the Jewish prayer books is "the Satan", not "hasatan", which is simply an anglicized version of a Hebrew pronunciation. The term "hasatan" is never used in the English translation of Orthodox Jewish prayer books nor in their biblical commentaries.
When translated into English, the term "hasatan" is always referred to as either "Satan" or "the Satan" - with a capital "S". You will not see the Orthodox Jews use the term "hasatan" with a small "s" in any of their English translations from Hebrew.
And yes, the term "ha" refers to "the", as this is an anglicized (English) version of a Hebrew pronunciation, as in the term, "HaShem", or "The Name". You would actually have to write the term in Hebrew font to be completely accurate, not English font.
Who is Satan? Is he the devil, the source of all temptation and evil who shows up later in the Judeo/Christian tradition?
Here in the Book of Job the answer to that question is no.
"ha satan" is the hebrew phrase to be translated here, and the most literal translation is "the adversary." "Adversary," in this context, is a courtroom metaphor and refers to the advocate on the other side of the argument (i.e., the prosecution or the defense, depending on which side we're looking from). The Hebrew "ha" is simply the definite article, "the" in English.
"ha satan" is thus a common noun, not a proper noun; it is not someone's name, as in George or Harriet.
Nor is it, for example, especially in these early books of the Hebrew scriptures, the person "Satan," the evil being who is the source of all evil and temptation.
There is even some suggestion, though I do not personally take it very seriously, that this "ha satan" may be one of the "sons of God" who the Prologue says were there with God when this conversation with the adversary begins. Tom Kerns PhD
The first thing we discover is that ‘ha-Satan’, which is Hebrew for "the Adversary" came into Yahweh’s presence reporting for service. We also discover that he comes into Yahweh’s presence with many other angelic sons of God, like him.
Later in this teaching we will deal with the topic of ben-Elohim (sons of God) who are of this angelic realm. They are also called ‘Watchers’. Don’t confuse ben-Elohim with low rank demons and unclean spirits. They are not the same thing. We’ll cover this in another teaching. I pray that your eyes are being opened to a few key points here:
1) All angels, even the wicked angelic host serve the Lord.
2)They must report to the Lord, serve Him.
3) Ha-Satan is fully accountable to Yahweh, he is a servant of Yahweh and is required to give account of his whereabouts and activities.
4)Ha-Satan has limitations and restrictions placed on him. Ha-Satan can only do what God gives him permission to do.
For example, in the Book 1 Enoch, there are 5 ha-Satans. The first and second are said to have been responsible for leading astray the angels and for bringing them down to earth, where they sinned with the daughters of men (69:4), while the third brought about the fall of Adam and Eve (69:6). The ha-Satans are allowed to access heaven in order to accuse men, but they are not confined to heaven.
The more study one does on ha-Satan it becomes clear that ha-Satan in nothing more a servant of God, an instrument or person used to carry out the purposes of Yahweh. We must never forget that ultimately God exercises sovereign control over both good and evil.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Did you bother to read what Hall said about himself in retrospect?
Originally posted by KSigMason
Who are you to presume to know our relationship with God?
Who are you to know what is in our heart?
It is not you who decides what my religion is so don't even attempt such a foolish act.
Freemasonry isn't a religion for a great many reasons:
- Freemasonry advocates no sectarian faith or practice.
- We have no dogma or theology. Religious discussion is forbidden in a masonic lodge thereby eliminating the chance for any masonic dogma to form.
- It offers no sacraments and does not claim to lead to salvation by works, by secret knowledge, or by any other means.
The secrets of Freemasonry are concerned with the modes of recognition only and not with the means of salvation.
- By any definition of religion accepted by our critics, we cannot qualify as a religion.
- Freemasonry supports religion. Freemasonry is far from indifferent to religion. Without interfering in religious practice, it expects each member to follow his own faith.
So what instructions of Freemasonry are wrong?
No man, when he hath lighted a candle, putteth it in a secret place, neither under a bushel, but on a candlestick, that they which come in may see the light. KJV Luke 11:33
Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. KJV Matthew 5:15
Nothing in Freemasonry contradicts my Christian beliefs. If anything my religious faith has only strengthened since I joined the Freemasons (not sure if it causation or correlation).
Once a mason, always a mason.
False.
Also note, there is no rebirth or resurrection. You are putting out lies.
You have no clue who I am or what I am capable of. How then can you determine wisdom or folly?
And yet there are "regular" Freemasons who have said Freemasonry is actually a religion.
In other words, Freemasonry does not advocate any of the religions that God has set upon the earth.
But, like most cults, Freemasonry has it's own language, collection of special terms and phrases, and unique meanings for words that are in more general use in the outer society.
There are prayers, there is a temple, there are the "seekers of more light", and there is the belief in reincarnation, there are all the things that make up a "religion".
The secrets of Freemasonry are secrets. That means you cannot be expected to tell what those secrets are. And you must deny them, if any non-mason mentions them. That itself, tells us that it's more than modes of recognition that is being kept secret.
But since ye do not, and proudly declare that no God is worshiped within the halls of Freemasonry, then ye think that therefore makes the practice of Freemasonry, being contrary to religion, not classifiable as religion.
Freemasonry raises no money for any religion. So, how does it support any religion?
Not to spread the word among the brethren, is wrong. Not to share the light, that the brethren might see it, is wrong.
When you are able and encouraged to share your light, rather than admonished for doing so, then Freemasonry will be in harmony with the Christian belief.
Surely, there is rebirth, the Buddhists believe in it. And a Christian would never deny the resurrection.
Codyoutlaw already supplied a source.
'Not a sentinet being'. Is Orthodox Rabbi Enkin wrong too? Did I mention he is Orthodox? Catch the prayer book part too?
Once more, Jews do not believe in Satan, they believe that good and evil desires (yetzer hatov/yetzer hara) exists within us all and that is the struggle we are having, not with the Devil but within ourselves.
These Jewish sages were not real good with the scholarly stuff then, were they?
So, moving on to verses 25, 26, 27: Jacob was winning, but with one touch, his opponent causes him to become lame. Then he asks for Jacob's name: And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for thou hast striven with God and with men, and hast prevailed. (Genesis 32:28, ASV) And Jacob asked him, and said, Tell me, I pray thee, thy name. And he said, Wherefore is it that thou dost ask after my name? And he blessed him there. (Genesis 32:29, ASV) And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for, said he, I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved. (Genesis 32:30, ASV)
His own God, not Satan.
Originally posted by CookieMonster09
He does not. Read the thread yourself. He does not quote from any Orthodox Jewish theologian.
First, the source of this quote is from Ariela Pelaia, not Rabbi Enkin. She studied at a Conservative Jewish seminary, not an Orthodox one (She graduated from the Jewish Theological Seminary, which is Conservative, not Orthodox). Click on the link yourself that you posted.
...
There is a huge theological difference between the Orthodox - the most rigorous and strict version of Judaism and the only version accepted in Israel today as being legitimate - and the other strains of Judaism, such as Reform, Conservative, Reconstructionism, etc. You are quoting from a liberal, or progressive version of Judaism that isn't considered authoritative by traditional Jews.
The one and only time that Satan is mentioned in the "Five books of Moses" is as a VERB.
It's part of the story of Balaam, who was hired to curse the Jews. En route, he gets blocked by an angel, whom G-d sent [this doesn't work as well in English as in Hebrew:] "to Satan him". In other words, Satan means to hinder or mislead.
In Hebrew an "S" and an "SH" are often represented by the same letter. So, the term Satan is also related to the Hebrew term Shtut, which means foolishness.
The Talmud teaches that a person only "sins" when a "spirit of foolishness" enters them. If a person was always rational, he/she would always do the right things. So "Satan" is the internal foolishness that gets us to do wrong- and then to defend our misbehavior. (In classical Jewish terms, we call this the "Evil inclination".)
We do encounter references later in the Bible to a "Satan" (like at the beginning of the book of Job). This is the angel that G-d created to act as the Accusing Voice in Heaven. So, when a person (whether alive or dead) is judged in Heaven, Satan has the job of digging up the dirt on them.
One thing is very clear in Judaism- Satan, the angel, is a CREATED entity. Like any other angel, he can only act in accordance with G-d's will.
Basically, Satan's got a dirty job, but someone's got to do it.
How about quoting an actual Orthodox Jewish commentary?
The information in this site is written predominantly from the Orthodox viewpoint, because I believe that is a good starting point for any inquiry into Judaism:
....
The yetzer ra is generally seen as something internal to a person, not as an external force acting on a person. The idea that "the devil made me do it" is not in line with the majority of thought in Judaism. Although it has been said that Satan and the yetzer ra are one and the same, this is more often understood as meaning that Satan is merely a personification of our own selfish desires, rather than that our selfish desires are caused by some external force.
There is no question that there will be no evil when Moshiach comes (see Zechariah 13), Satan included. The notion of throwing an angel into Hell is odd. Angels are not only beings without a yetzer hara, but they have are actually just bursts of G-d's energy and can never separate from Him, let alone be punished.
Frankly, it's ridiculous to debate further because you clearly haven't read any Orthodox Jewish sources.
Rambam's Moreh Nevuchim Book III, chap. 22 discussing sefer Iyove
"...the Talmud says as follows: "Rebbe Shimeon ben Lakish, says: "The adversary (satan), evil inclination (yezer ha-ra'), and the angel of death, are one and the same being." Here we find all that has been mentioned by us in such a dear manner that no intelligent person will be in doubt about it. It has thus been shown to you that one and the same thing is designated by these three different terms, and that actions ascribed to these three are in reality the actions of one and thesame agent. Again, the ancient doctors of the Talmud said: "The adversary (satan) goes about and misleads, then he goes up and accuses, obtains permission, and takes the soul." You have already beentold that when David at the time of the plague was shown the angel" with the sword drawn in his hand stretched out overJerusalem."
Rambam and Rebbe Shimeon ben Lakish teach that "satan" as discussed in Iyove and other instances, refers to a person's own instincts. Not "part" of God, or another force in the universe.
Strikingly, Maimonides quotes the saying of the Talmud, "Rabbi Simon ben Laqish said: Satan, the evil inclination, and the angel of death are one and the same."32 This somewhat enigmatic equation seems clearer given Maimonides’ assertion that Satan stems from a root meaning "to turn away;" thus, turning away from the Law is perverting what knowledge of God one has. Therefore:
Originally posted by KSigMason
By all reasoning you cannot know my relationship with God. Who are you to say I don't? I know my Faith and you are no one to tell me otherwise.
I have posted nothing to suggest I have no relationship with God. My faith is in the Almighty, I just refuse to bow to men who spew poison and call it wisdom.
And Jesus said, Are ye also yet without understanding?
Do not ye yet understand, that whatsoever entereth in at the mouth goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the draught?
But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man. KJV Matthew|15:16-18
Originally posted by TheGreatDivider
Bill Cooper [Behold A Pale Horse , p. 78]
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by TheGreatDivider
Bill Cooper [Behold A Pale Horse , p. 78]
Wow, Bill Cooper. Maybe you can cite another reliable source like David Icke for your next off topic post.
edit on 16-9-2012 by AugustusMasonicus because: networkdude has no beer
Originally posted by TheGreatDivider
How's that off-topic? He says the masons are made up of Luciferian Illuminati.
Originally posted by swan001
reply to post by AugustusMasonicus
I should read less Dan Brown...