posted on Sep, 14 2012 @ 03:44 AM
reply to post by Laokin
Have you seen this quote on page 2 of this thread.
Originally posted by BAZ752
Only 1700 of us...still? Interesting that such a minute proportion of the industry subscribes to these theories. I'm part of an IStructE dominated
organisation and none of whom agree fully with the AE911 movement.
He is a structural engineer!!
So how about this comment re Architects
Originally posted by BAZ752
Hmm, well, true, but it's not strictly a case of Architect's avoiding it so much as Architects are not legally qualified to prepare structural
calculations at an institutional level. Legitimate Structural Engineering Consultancies, especially those involve in designing habitable structures
are bound by practices under the regulatory bodies of their respective institutions (IStructE as it is here in the UK). Architect's have a good
understanding of the design principles and even from a structural analysis view point, but their remit 99/100 times is far removed from these
elements. You'll never hear an architect getting involved with sub-structure or super-structure design unless the conceptual design cannot be
achieved through feasible solutions, or such designs require the assumptions being made through the Architect's consult. Ultimately, if their design
can be achieved structurally without alterations to their concept, they pretty much have zero involvement (unless you tell we need a deep slender
section across that opening, it's going to ruin your light array!)
MY background 30+ years in construction worked in the design/drawing office of a STRUCTURAL STEELWORK company when I first left school, have worked in
a technical capacity for many many years.
I am on site on a regular basis be it down a tunnel, under a bridge deck or on a hoist 20,30,40+ stories up.
I have tested structural components and fixings etc sometimes to destruction and talk to architects and engineers on a regular basis giving them
recommendations to solve problems they have!
Since 9/11 I have not spoken to ONE who thinks like Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth
So lets look at what you said
Originally posted by Laokin
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Shamatt
1700 Architects and Engineers in 11 years so how many HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS world wide have yet to sign up!!!!
OR is that FACT just ignored works both ways you know!!!!
This is the most retarded post I've ever personally seen in any 9/11 thread.
There are many, many, many, many that don't wish to associate with the truth because the vast majority doesn't wish to hear it, that they are afraid
to sully their name.
There are many, many, many, that aren't even really good enough to honestly hold qualification. There are also, many, many, many, many that did not
even bother to investigate.
What interaction DO you have with any architects or more importantly STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS , using conspiracy cliches is not an argument or proof seen
any surveys to back up your NONSENSE.
So if you claim many are not good enough do you prepare their exams have you any IDEA what theses guys have to do to get their qualifications? I
don't think so!!!
Come back with some FACTS not cliches for example someone on this thread said office fires don't get hot enough I posted back FACTS that it can.
Come back in say what 30+ years when you have done something ACTUALLY connected with construction!!!!
edit on 14-9-2012 by wmd_2008 because:
(no reason given)