It's nothing personal, just an observation. Every debate here on ATS has people like you guys. They always linger until the last, when the
discussion is more or less dead. Nobody cares to argue it, beyond the point. Then make up some make-up discussion, and then use that as a link in
some other discussion, claim to have "debunked" something. When all they are referring to is a little conversation between like-minded.
And then, of course, you have the little child whose too sensitive and goes to momma to complain about someone making fun of him. There's an old
saying, if you can't take the heat ...
When you come here, and claim you have some BS in physics, and you're advocating a perpetual machine, without reservations. Then you should be
prepared to be made fun of. Niel Adams is not a physicist, and his models aren't absolutely correct ... but the fundamental basics are. He wrongly
assumes the timeframe, from the age of the seabed ... wihtout reserving for "densation" of material. But all in all, he's got more "physics" in his
models, than what you represented here before. Except for the lame music, but neither should the music enhance or reduce your ability to objectively
watch the contents.
I stated you are advocating a flat earth model, in 2-Dimensions. What you come up with a simulation, the same kind ofr simulation Niel Adams came up
with. Except, this is where Niel Adams is actually a pro ... and you guys were complaining about he shouldn't dabbing in physics. What Niel Adams
comes with is a KISS model, that even a child can see. What you guys come up with is a computer simulation of an impossible thermo-dynamics ...
that's more a movie, than Neils Adams was making. Except it lacks the good music ... hell, I can show you a movie of people travelling through worm
holes, to distant galaxies ... and I can take the same, and put into computer graphics and call it a computer model. It's still just fiction.
Paleomagnetic data can be interpreted in different ways, depending on whose doing the statistics. GPS readings, can be interpreted in different ways,
depending on what your reference point is. Seizmic waves will give the same results if travelling through a dense plasma core, as an iron-nickel
Basically, it goes like this. If you come here and tell me you're looking for a "gravitron", I'll tell you it makes sense, but I'd maybe disagree on
wether there is one. Tell me you're looking for "the God Particle" and it's "the answer for all". I'll tell you that your physics degree is just a
You guys come here, and start argueing Expanding Earth. Nothing wrong with debating the issues, but your argueing for a perpetual machine. Lacking
the fundemantal knowledge of the basics of spherical formation. Putting forth thermo-dynamics, that has no rational explanation as to the energies
required and without an energy source to provide them. And accepting it as truth, without finding it's flaws. And the most notorious of all, you are
argueing a Hypothesis, as it's an absolut truth. Maybe we can argue, that it's a theory ... but it is about as far from being correct as you amuse
yourself of Expanding Earth to be. Yet you argue it, as it's an absolut truth ...
Your not a physicists, your a believer. And your argueing your beliefs, not scientific data. And that is also the reason I absolutely discard your
arguements. I look at your data, but whatever arguements you provide with it, I ignore.
edit on 22/9/2012 by bjarneorn because: (no reason given)