Well.......a wet patch of sand anyway. I don't know if I'd call it "mud" or not, but for the purposes of the thread title, it works well enough.
I was just looking at today's (well, the latest) images from Curiosity, and just from the thumbs, I knew I'd like the pictures. Great angle. From a
camera under the chassis, down by the wheels. I thought "oh! great angle for looking for little bugs" or something like this......a nice close view of
whatever's there anyway. So I start browsing through them..........no bugs, no fossils, no more fingers blown off ancient
statues......awwww......lol.
After disappointment lets loose it's grip I just start skimming through each one again as I always do, just looking for interesting things or geometry
and I think "wow, quite a bit of sand is sticking to the wheels. more than I've ever seen in other pics to date" but think nothing more of it. But
then I get to the last 2 images from that angle and that "more dirt sticking than normal" turns into very wet sand, to the point where it looks like
mud!!
Here's a link to the two images where it's CLEARLY wet. Click on the image to make it more detailed
EDIT- In case it's not clear to you where I'm looking, zoom in to the treads at the very tops of the wheels in the images.
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
Now, am I just seeing things here? Am I crazy or did that rover just go through a muddy patch of sand? Mind you, it's moving in this series of images.
If you look at the 5 or 6 images leading up to this, it seems to be rolling into a gradually more wet area of sand.
Thoughts? A ground spring perhaps? Did it just rain? Am I just crazy?
edit on 11-9-2012 by Larry L because: (no reason
given)
edit on 11-9-2012 by Larry L because: (no reason given)
edit on 11-9-2012 by Larry L because: (no reason
given)