It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Contraceptives are not 100% effective. So unplanned pregnancies can and do happen all the time to very well-off people and educated folks as well. I think we only serve to push the issue into "class warfare" territory by taking a narrow-minded stance.
Also, kids are going to have sex no matter what. They have since the beginning of time and will till the end. It's not a matter of intellectual will, but an animal instinct inside us all. Sex is gonna happen. Nothing we can do about it.
Only 38% of the abortions were covered by medicare. Leaving the rest to take care of it themselves or other insurance coverage.......so I think your "foodstamp/welfare" comment may be irrelevant and does not properly label the majority of people having abortions in NYC.
You really like to make assumptions and put words in other members mouths while pushing your version of morality don't you?
When & Where did I post that contraceptives were 100% effective?
I also, highly doubt that "Educated people" [I've said nothing about "Well off"] would make the repeatedly mistake of getting themselves pregnant.
Where did I make the argument they wouldn't have sex?
Of course they will. I'd rather them use a condom [Which does cut down on STDs and pregnancies] Whether you'll like to admit it or not and in spite of it not being it's 100 % effective
Originally posted by SpaceJockey1 and more gay married couples, start lining up to also adopt.
How about letting people go through their pregnancy and then giving child up for adoption?
I also have issues with my tax dollars being spent in this manner and esp by people who don't give a damn about whose paying for their poor judgement repeatedly.
In September 1993, Congress rewrote the provision to include Medicaid funding for abortions in cases where the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. The present version of the Hyde Amendment requires coverage of abortion in cases of rape, incest, and life endangerment.
nstead of teaching them to be permanently welfare people on the dole]
Originally posted by jeantherapy
reply to post by SpaceJockey1
Why is one life form more important to you than another? A bug you might step on has a conscious active mind, working to fill a function. Quite unlike an embryo which doesn't show brain activity until after six weeks. If six weeks isn't enough time to decide on abortion, then yes it must be called off. But know this: every life form on Earth is equally important, even if your inflated human ego doesn't allow you to see it.
From the 15th week of gestation until approximately the 26th, other techniques must be used. Dilation and evacuation (D&E) consists of opening the cervix of the uterus and emptying it using surgical instruments and suction. Premature labor and delivery can be induced with prostaglandin; this can be coupled with injecting the amniotic fluid with hypertonic solutions containing saline or urea. After the 16th week of gestation, abortions can also be induced by intact dilation and extraction (IDX) (also called intrauterine cranial decompression), which requires surgical decompression of the fetus's head before evacuation.
Abortion rates also vary depending on the stage of pregnancy and the method practiced. In 2003, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that 26% of abortions in the United States were known to have been obtained at less than 6 weeks' gestation, 18% at 7 weeks, 15% at 8 weeks, 4.1% at 16 through 20 weeks and 1.4% at more than 21 weeks. 90.9% of these were classified as having been done by "curettage" (suction-aspiration, Dilation and curettage, Dilation and evacuation), 7.7% by "medical" means (mifepristone), 0.4% by "intrauterine instillation" (saline or prostaglandin), and 1.0% by "other" (including hysterotomy and hysterectomy).
Originally posted by Monger
Originally posted by SpaceJockey1 and more gay married couples, start lining up to also adopt.
How about letting people go through their pregnancy and then giving child up for adoption?
How about letting the individual in question choose which is best for them? Being a man, I wouldn't know, but from what I hear, the birthing process is an extremely unpleasant situation. I cannot fault any woman for not wanting to go through that.
Not your womb, not your fetus, not your life, not your call.
Nice subtle dig at gay marriage there, by the way.
The focus HAS to be on AVOIDING PREGNANCIES IN THE FIRST PLACE.