posted on Sep, 30 2012 @ 06:47 AM
reply to post by totallackey
I take it you believe Carnicorn and Thomas are true scientists. Fine. My only question to you at this point is: Why has there been no lawsuit filed
over the chemtrails?
I think Einstein was a clerk, a job his Dad helped him find because he was mostly unemployed.
Don't know much about Carnicom, personally, except for the things he has written on chemtrails but here is an excerpt from a biography:
Mr. Clifford E. Carnicom
Clifford also worked as a technical research scientist acting in a professional capacity supporting analysis and development of major Department
of Defense physical and weapons modeling systems, with extensive computer programming and system application development experience. He has held a
Top Secret/SCI clearance. He was appointed for and completed two years of intensive graduate level studies in mathematics, statistics, computer
science, and geodesy under the auspices of the Department of Defense.
Also don't know much about Thomas other than that he's a well known journalist of the investigative reporter variety and know him also only from the
things he's written about chemtrails and 'smart' particles. Here's an excerpt from some biographical material on him:
William Thomas is an award-winning journalist specializing in news the mainstream media does not report. During and immediately after the Gulf
War, he served five months in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait as a member of a three-man environmental emergency response team. A professional
journalist since the mid 1960's, his writing and photography have appeared in more than 50 publications in 8 countries. William is the author of five
books, as well as several electronic books dealing with cell phones and other electromagnetic hazards.
I believe there are a number of court processes in the works dealing with some different aspects of geoengineering. Court cases against corporations
or military industrial complexes are never a slam dunk. Take a look at asbestos, for instance, whose harmful effects have been known since at least
Roman Empire times (2000 years) and which only comparatively recently won compensation for victims. And even though the EPA has since declared 'no
safe level of exposure', it's still in use in, for instance, India. It's still being mined and shipped there for use in building houses. The new
corporate line is that it's coated now to remove the danger or that only a certain shape was harmful and now a different shape particle is being
used. Corporations, in our world, have infinite resources and gangs of lawyers to come up with ever more convoluted and diverse appeals and
The people, as a consumer group, can wield power through refusal to purchase, for instance, GMO. That's a comparatively quick way to bring a
mega-corporation to it's knees. But how would one wield that with chemtrails? A military industrial complex may be run on profit via their
contracts and many people do profit from the government but it's not quite the same as taking on a corporation that understands money and concedes by
paying money because loss of profit is the only thing they do understand and the only thing that hurts enough to change their behavior. Chemtrailing
for national security is an altogether different animal to haul into court.