It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by superman2012
Originally posted by 0zzymand0s
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
"Wrote his death warrant? The chance of a healthy man -- without open wounds on his penis -- of contracting aids from an HIV positive woman, after 1 episode of unprotected vaginal intercourse is about 2 in 1000. Deny ignorance.
His chances would have gone down to 0% had he been notified and refused the encounter though. Deny ignorance and don't twist the facts.
Edit: Why 2 out of 1000? Why not 20 out of 10000?edit on 10-9-2012 by superman2012 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by LaughingatHumanity
Hopefully her kids don't end up being such scumbags. "She took my life so I took hers" im typically not a fan of vengeance but she had it coming.
No she didn't "have it coming. " What an insane statement. It is possible and easy to see why someone loosely hinged and impulsive might be driven to kill her. That I will agree with but to say she had it coming is crazy talk and he is as much a scum bag or more. She did not kill him. He killed her. He probably will catch nothing and be fine and even if he isn't - it is not justification for murder.edit on 10-9-2012 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)
In many countries, the intentional or reckless infection of a person with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is considered to be a crime. This is often conflated, in laws and in discussion, with criminal exposure to HIV, which does not require the transmission of the virus and often, as in the cases of spitting and biting, does not even include a realistic means of transmission.[1][2] People who do so can be charged with criminal transmission of HIV, murder, manslaughter, attempted murder, or assault. Some states have enacted laws expressly to criminalize HIV transmission (or HIV exposure), as in the United States, while others charge under the existing laws, as in the United Kingdom.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Most people don't respond like this.edit on 10-9-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HIWATT
Originally posted by Unity_99
Most people don't respond like this.edit on 10-9-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
Really?
How do you think "most people" would respond when they are faced with death?
I suppose "most people" would just sit down, have a spot of tea, and discuss it civilly?
Originally posted by yourmaker
Originally posted by HIWATT
Originally posted by Unity_99
Most people don't respond like this.edit on 10-9-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
Really?
How do you think "most people" would respond when they are faced with death?
I suppose "most people" would just sit down, have a spot of tea, and discuss it civilly?
I'm almost of the belief this would have been a normal natural reaction throughout the ages had they known what HIV was or what it does.
They've certainly killed for a lot less. Perhaps what i'm trying to imply is maybe this is part of our instinct?
Originally posted by BIHOTZ
She really did the same thing to him, just in a different way.
edit on 10-9-2012 by BIHOTZ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 0zzymand0s
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
"Wrote his death warrant? The chance of a healthy man -- without open wounds on his penis -- of contracting aids from an HIV positive woman, after 1 episode of unprotected vaginal intercourse is about 2 in 1000. Deny ignorance.
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by ollncasino
It is not a given someone will transfer the aids virus to another person so this guy should have waited to see if he contracted the virus before killing the woman.
He also should have asked her if she had any diseases before sleeping with her. Come on fella - take some responsibility for your own irresponsible actions.
Originally posted by 0zzymand0s
"Wrote his death warrant? The chance of a healthy man -- without open wounds on his penis -- of contracting aids from an HIV positive woman, after 1 episode of unprotected vaginal intercourse is about 2 in 1000. Deny ignorance.
.
Thirty-six states and territories have laws that criminalize HIV exposure and/or nondisclosure of HIV status for sexual contact, needle-sharing, and/or contact with “body fluids” such as saliva. Even in states that do not have specific laws on HIV exposure or disclosure requirements, people living with HIV have been prosecuted under general criminal laws, such as assault or attempted murder. Although these laws criminalize conduct that is either consensual (both people agreed to it) or carried no significant risk of HIV transmission, these laws can be used to prosecute people just for being HIV positive.
Originally posted by nightstalker78
Originally posted by biggmoneyme
it's difficult for a woman to give a man hiv.
Oh really now? Care to back that up with some real stats?
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
That's the second time someone has suggested that men can pretty much sleep around with HIV Positive women with little to no concerns.... Oddly, it was a concern to really shake people to their toenails when 1/3rd of the prostitutes working the truck stops in Gary, Indiana turned out HIV positive. For all this talk about 'nearly impossible', those long odds had the local Police Department posting that notice about the % of recently tested and confirmed HIV lot lizards on the front door or windows of all the truck stops up there. Gary is a major truck stop center in the U.S.. There are at least one of each major chain in a few mile stretch, and 2 of each for two of the chains, when I was last up there a few years ago.
So...for the fuss I've personally seen and the outright terror I've witnessed in drivers who, obviously, had been doing more than having conversation with their 'Commercial Company' at those truck stops, I'd dearly LOVE a link to a Government (Any Government with credibility in the world) or a respected organization that shows 1:2000 or even 1:4000 or..higher odds AGAINST infection by unprotected sexual intercourse with a fully infected female.
On the off chance anyone finds such a bit of proof I'll wander back in the morning to see... I'll be genuinely interested to see what the stats show, if in fact stats exist anywhere to support those assertions.... Thanks in advance!