Amazing Bloodline - Mitt Romney Is Related To Obama & Bush

page: 3
44
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 08:52 PM
link   
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
 


Thanks to modern science we no longer have to rely upon genealogy records. We can use DNA to track these things. I'm just now beginning to dig for sources and links - but this is a good place to begin.

~Heff




posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 09:03 PM
link   
Okay I might as well throw my factoid into the mix....

This is a bizzare fact I heard. I don't know if it's true or not but it's plausable. You have a few thousand atoms of most every living historical figure as part of your genetic make up. So you have some atoms that were in hitler, alexander the great, queens kings emperors buddha mohamad etc etc. As the atoms get recirculated into the world they end up in the food chain, and back into people. I heard this from a few different sources now. But still if someone can confirm this that would be interesting.



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 09:41 PM
link   
I've done genealogy for many years now and I can guarantee they did not check all the documentation needed to prove this ancestry. Ancestry.com has a massive database but it is not all correct. I have found many errors, even errors in my tree from the trusted Mormons.

Case in point. My family was supposed to be related to Davy Crockett and his lineage is well documented on Ancestry. My gggggrandmother was a Crockett and supposedly descended from Samuel Crockett, a brother to Davey's grandfather. Dna has proved all the many Crocketts here are not related to Davy. As for my line, the Samuel Crockett was actually here before Davy's family.

I dare say we would all find ourselves in some way related to royalty if we followed all our many lines and actually checked the documentation required to prove it. In fact, many if not most of the families who came to America were of some wealth or they could not have made the trip.

As we say here on ATS, source, pics, or in this case, documentation, or it isn't so.



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 09:49 PM
link   
I have spent too much time on ancestry.com Basically, if your family has been in North America for a few hundred years you are related. Six generations, my mom and dad have a common ancestor, 7 generations and my husband and I do. And that is just direct lines. If I looked at lines of brothers/sisters of all my ancestors I am sure I am related to both my next door neighbour and a president.

So I guess I am not surprised even a little.



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 09:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Pedro4077
 





2 The Bundy Bloodline


I would have no problem with this bloodline taking over. Who wouldn't want this man for president?




posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 10:07 PM
link   

Moulay Ismaïl Ibn Sharif (1634? or 1645? – 22 March 1727), reigned 1672–1727. was the second ruler of the Moroccan Alaouite dynasty. Like others of the dynasty, Ismaïl claimed to be a descendant of Muhammad through his roots to Hassan ibn Ali. He is also known in his native country as the "Warrior King".



Moulay Ismaïl is alleged to have fathered 888 children
en.wikipedia.org...

I'd bet half of Morocco is related to that guy somehow.

It's very possible that many men of royalty have fathered hundreds of children off record.



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 10:17 PM
link   
Does anyone find it odd that the recent presidents for the past two decades have daughters rather than sons*?
So are they planning the old 'skip' a generation and hope no one notices that Granpa on Moms side was president also.


It should be 50/50 but just off the top of my head we have Chelsy C, the two bush girls, the obama girls,



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 10:23 PM
link   
reply to post by VforVendettea
 



Does anyone find it odd that the recent presidents for the past two decades have daughters rather than sons*?

So are they planning the old 'skip' a generation and hope no one notices that Granpa on Moms side was president also.


It should be 50/50 but just off the top of my head we have Chelsy C, the two bush girls, the obama girls,


Maybe it’s a result of low testosterone.


You think this is intentional; gene manipulation? Now THAT’S a conspiracy!



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 10:39 PM
link   
reply to post by seabag
 



Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by VforVendettea
 



Does anyone find it odd that the recent presidents for the past two decades have daughters rather than sons*?

So are they planning the old 'skip' a generation and hope no one notices that Granpa on Moms side was president also.


It should be 50/50 but just off the top of my head we have Chelsy C, the two bush girls, the obama girls,


Maybe it’s a result of low testosterone.


You think this is intentional; gene manipulation? Now THAT’S a conspiracy!


Woaa that is a good point..So does testosterone count affect whether you have a boy or a girl?



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 11:12 PM
link   
reply to post by HumanitiesLastHope
 


No, in fact it is estrogen that does.

Too much womenly features in these boys !!



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 11:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Signals
But aren't we ALL related to one common ancestor?




Yeah, and they're all jews, according to the $criptures.



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 11:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by seabag
 


I'm kinda amazed this is the first you're hearing about this, especially since you spend so much time on a conspirarcy site


Yeah when I'm in my mid 40s or early 50s I'll make a run for the Presidency because clearly you cannot be president if you are not from a particular bloodline. Reminds me of the Royal families and their bloodline rulers, who knew the SAME thing is going on in America? Who knew when people learn about this they don't care?

Apathy, it's killing the USA



"Apathy, it's killing the USA".

It always did!

Once the European terrorists that invaded the land of indigenous peoples of the Americas and dessimated their culture, what more would you expect from these invadors and their descendants, other than.....apathy?

Apathy is a consequence of Guilt.

If one came accross a pack of wolves, out in nature's sanctum, and shot them all to death in one go, just because you had the means to, wouldn't you also become somewhat apathetic, because you were not sure you did the right thing, in the name of Mother Nature, as opposed to what was expected of you by your friggin' bloodline of hostile humans?

The sense of Guilt creates the sense of Apathy, because the man that has raped the inner sanctum of another living being, cannot face himself.

Hence: Apathy, and a sense of 'Loss of Spirit'......That's what apathy amounts to.



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 11:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by jacobe001
There is a striking resemblance


Not only physically, but politically as well.





That's because they're both clones of the One Gov.

(Brilliant interfacing!)



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 11:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by jude11

Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by jude11
 



6 degrees of separation law connects us all.

Peace


So you’re saying I have a shot at being POTUS???


Wait a minute….are you saying I’m related to OBAMA???


I know what you mean but I know people (OK…one person) who have traced their genealogy and they’re not related to former Presidents. This still seems a bit strange to me. I don’t think the unproven theory of 6 degrees of separation can explain away all of these connections, that is if they’re accurate.




Yeah it's a theory and an interesting one at that.

I surely do hope that I don't find this creature in my family tree.





Peace



Who's that?
Erin Burnett after her firing from CNN Newsroom?

edit on 10-9-2012 by Starling because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2012 @ 11:59 PM
link   
I think it's hilarious that people call this a coincidence and point to the common ancestry of all mankind, all the while ignoring the fact that royal families have been purposely intermarrying and interbreeding to keep "pure" royal bloodlines for centuries

We were even taught this in grade school, were we not?

Crack a book and get some context, some time....





posted on Sep, 10 2012 @ 12:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Pedro4077

Originally posted by r2d246
The people who run the world starting from the illuminati at the top, going down down down all the way to leaders of countries are all one family. (or a few families) it's all interbreading that dates back thousands of years. You can't rule a country without being part of the family. Kinda like the moffia. Really no different at all. They think there some kind of a royal bloodline. They think that interbreeding keeps some kind of power within the human. And over time as they interbreed they get more of this internal power or chi energy so to speak. Very sick people no doubt.


I read about 13 ruling family's that have held power for millenia, here is the list.

1 The Astor Bloodline

2 The Bundy Bloodline

3 The Collins Bloodline

4 The DuPont Bloodline

5 The Freeman Bloodline

6 The Kennedy Bloodline

7 The Li Bloodline

8 The Onassis Bloodline

9 The Reynolds Bloodline

10 The Rockefeller Bloodline

11 The Rothschild Bloodline

12 The Russell Bloodline

13 The Van Duyn Bloodline

"It’s a big club and you ain't in it. You and I are not in The big club"









But you gotta admit: The Obama strain mix makes everybody cuter lookin'!....No?



posted on Sep, 10 2012 @ 12:19 AM
link   
Agreed. He's easily the most charismatic president we've had since our last real president.

RIP JFK

Okay... Bubba Clinton wasn't half bad. His sax playing antics and intern-foolery were sort of endearing.
edit on 10-9-2012 by iwilliam because: hail to the chief



posted on Sep, 10 2012 @ 12:48 AM
link   
reply to post by seaside sky
 
who are you kidding some familys can trace roots going back 2000 years



posted on Sep, 10 2012 @ 02:02 AM
link   
reply to post by seabag
 


So that means that no matter who becomes President of the United States next, the NWO will still have its hands elbow-deep in at least one superpower?

What a surprise.



posted on Sep, 10 2012 @ 04:04 AM
link   
reply to post by Hefficide
 



This thread is where it came up. I can dig through my browser history for the links that I used in researching what was being said - but will have to do so later. Right now R/L has me barely here and preoccupied. ~Heff


Hi Heff and seabag

The bloodlines, as far as I know, first appeared in the public domain through Stan Deyo's "The Cosmic Conspiracy" first published in 1978

He goes into great detail about same and adds a Christian slant regarding a Satanic contract agreement (of sorts) between certain bloodlines and an intent to usher in the NWO via a cashless society and chipping every soul on the planet to bring about fulfillment of scripture.

A "must have" book for those wanting to tie in this subject with UFO's and secret government - many revised editions have been released since.

Frightening stuff - Stan is ex-US air force intelligence turned born again Christian but his research is faultless - I still cannot get my head around his analysis on electro-magnetic technology and he was involved in mind-control Ops back then as well.





new topics

top topics



 
44
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join