It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by 46ACE
reply to post by flyswatter
Thanks; I equated the two: birth and issuing an ssn. I was mistaken.
I think I can be forgiven for questioning:" Why a completyely unremarkable citizen would be born in Hawaii and fly to Conneticut (?) to apply for an ssn"
I have an ssn issued for the state I was born in(" normalcy bias" and all).
Thanks for setting me straight.
Oh, by all means! Questioning things is just fine, as long as you are not single-minded in your acceptance of answers. You havent indicated that you are, so no reason for me to complain
I dont really place a lot of importance on the prefix, partly due to the fact that my own SSN has the same type of issue. My SSN prefix is from Alaska, still trying to figure out how that one happened.
Originally posted by 46ACE
Interesting point "Major"(?)
I agree it definitely could figure in to a justice’s reluctance to "look under that rock". But at what point does:"kicking the can farther down the road" to the next guy need to stop?edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: fixed a"double negative"
Originally posted by queenannie38
Yes: #1) In the actual newspaper : Birth announcements could be phoned in by relatives as a community news"service": like people entering the service get a little paragraph...
Originally posted by agentoftrvth
reply to post by Golf66
One thing I have yet to see any Birther explain without resorting to the ridiculous notion that his parents somehow knew he would be President one day, is how an announcement of Obama's birth got published in the Honolulu Advertiser and the Star Bulletin in 1961, if he was born outside the country. Want to give it a shot?
Originally posted by agentoftrvth
reply to post by Golf66
One thing I have yet to see any Birther explain without resorting to the ridiculous notion that his parents somehow knew he would be President one day, is how an announcement of Obama's birth got published in the Honolulu Advertiser and the Star Bulletin in 1961, if he was born outside the country. Want to give it a shot?
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
To everyone involved in this thread on both sides.
I would personally like to thank you all for not attempting to slander my great state of Indiana, as we have a great record of impartiality, in most things. Our system isn't perfect by any measure, but it is in comparisson to the coasts, a perfect example of a system that actually works. When our police kikck in the wrong doors and kill people, they don't get a pass, they pass legislation allowing the citizens to shoot them to protect the sanctity f their own homes, when we have corupt politicians our LEOs arrest them, and our prosecutors.......wiat for it....prosecute them!
In closing, I am happy to let my states judiciary hear this case, as it will be fair, and will be unpartial, working solely on facts.the truth will be discovered based on facts, and this issue will be finally put to rest, for the good of all the nation. Once and for all.
According to Susan Daniels, of Daniels and Associates Investigations, Inc. in Chardon Ohio, when searching through database aggregators such as IRB, it is common to find a subject referenced with two or three Social Security Numbers (SSN). Here are some of the reasons a person may show-up with multiple SSN’s:
•a wife’s or child’s SSN could end up with father’s name
•a parent’s SSN could show up with a child
•the subject bought something with someone else and the SSNs could end up with each other’s name
•the database producer is relating several SSN’s to one address
•an error by whoever entered the data
Susan Daniels of Daniels and Associates Investigations, Inc. (9754 Thwing Road Chardon, OH 44024, Tel.:440.286.4072) has been a Private Investigator for 15 years.
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
To everyone involved in this thread on both sides.
I would personally like to thank you all for not attempting to slander my great state of Indiana, as we have a great record of impartiality, in most things. Our system isn't perfect by any measure, but it is in comparisson to the coasts, a perfect example of a system that actually works. When our police kikck in the wrong doors and kill people, they don't get a pass, they pass legislation allowing the citizens to shoot them to protect the sanctity f their own homes, when we have corupt politicians our LEOs arrest them, and our prosecutors.......wiat for it....prosecute them!
In closing, I am happy to let my states judiciary hear this case, as it will be fair, and will be unpartial, working solely on facts.the truth will be discovered based on facts, and this issue will be finally put to rest, for the good of all the nation. Once and for all.
If it is given a fair hearing and not tossed out on "standing" or "other technicality" Yet again and dismissed as a non issue; I personally vow to never bring it up again... That's all we want somebody to be granted access to records sealed earlyon in this administration and to look at the peculiar circumstantial evidence of irregularities.
Believe me: Nobody will be more "relieved"; than I will be. When I can have a "president" again..edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
To everyone involved in this thread on both sides.
I would personally like to thank you all for not attempting to slander my great state of Indiana, as we have a great record of impartiality, in most things. Our system isn't perfect by any measure, but it is in comparisson to the coasts, a perfect example of a system that actually works. When our police kikck in the wrong doors and kill people, they don't get a pass, they pass legislation allowing the citizens to shoot them to protect the sanctity f their own homes, when we have corupt politicians our LEOs arrest them, and our prosecutors.......wiat for it....prosecute them!
In closing, I am happy to let my states judiciary hear this case, as it will be fair, and will be unpartial, working solely on facts.the truth will be discovered based on facts, and this issue will be finally put to rest, for the good of all the nation. Once and for all.
If it is given a fair hearing and not tossed out on "standing" or "other technicality" Yet again and dismissed as a non issue; I personally vow to never bring it up again... That's all we want somebody to be granted access to records sealed earlyon in this administration and to look at the peculiar circumstantial evidence of irregularities.
Believe me: Nobody will be more "relieved"; than I will be. When I can have a "president" again..edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)
These arent records "sealed early in this administration." These are records that have been sealed from day 1, the same way that they are for you and I. He doesnt have to lift a finger to seal anything related to his birth certificate or any other birth records, the law does it for him.edit on 10-9-2012 by flyswatter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by aardvark888
I can't believe how much time and energy goes into debating this non-issue. It's not that Obama is black, it's that he is systematically destroying America from within, and this is his only goal. He is black on the inside too.
Originally posted by Golf66
His mother was obviously promiscuous. He has something there to hide that much is clear - be it the place, or the parentage, or even the timing…
He may not have even been aware of it at first or for a long time – it is possible his mother was simply ashamed of the real father (or she didn’t know who because there were so many partners) and she needed the timing to be right to hide it from Barrack Sr who she claimed was the father.
I mean stranger dogma has been attributed to a woman covering up infidelity or unacceptable promiscuity at an early age.
It was called the virgin birth and that lie told by a young girl to her parents and then by them to cover for their family honor. It spawned an entire religion and is still alive 2000+ years later. How many people have died in the name of Christianity to cover the pre-marital coitus of an underage unwed girl? Actually, it didn’t have to be coitus just some semen on a finger would do it and bam the whole “immaculate lie was spawned” to cover for some teenage shenanigans. Won’t we all feel stupid then.