It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by longlostbrother
[Obama's Cert was ONLY questioned by political propagandists, such as yourself. Never by any legitimate authority. The state that issued it has vouched for it, and for the courts, thanks to the US Constitution, that's enough.
There's no requirement for US citizenship in Obama's case, other than being born in the US, and no law at all against dual citizens being President. Obviously.
The only reason you're repeating this garbage is to try and score political points. The law, and he facts, are all very clear.
Defending your lies is just a way to keep your propaganda alive.
Sad.
Lawyers let their license lapse for very compelling reasons, often to avoid or escape censure or outright criminal charges. As an example, Bill Clinton kept active his law license even when he became president. In 2000 the Arkansas Supreme Court’s Committee on Professional Conduct called for Clinton’s disbarment, saying he lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. In January 2001 Clinton reached an agreement under which he was ordered to pay $25,000 in fines to Arkansas state’s bar officials and his Arkansas law license was suspended for five years. The agreement came on the condition that Whitewater prosecutors would not pursue federal perjury charges against him. Clinton was suspended by the Supreme Court in October 2001, and, facing disbarment from that court, Clinton resigned from the Supreme Court bar in November
Or it could be that a young white woman fell in love with a black African man in 1961 and had a baby by him as an unwed mother.
He is the first POTUS who was not born in wedlock.
SO WHAT?
Originally posted by Thunderheart
I pose a question to the Trusters,
can you explain away why Obama's social security number fail e-verify?
This is the ONE thing about Obama's background that I truly have a problem with.
Originally posted by thepresident
I'm sure Hillary and Bill Clinton were too stupid to expose Obama's
alleged Kenyen birth place during the Democratic primaries
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by spleenika
reply to post by Thunderheart
Did you know it is actually illegal to use E-verify on someone who is not a direct employee of yours?
Anyone who knowingly and willfully uses SSNVS to request or obtain information from Social Security under false pretenses violates Federal law and may be punished by a fine, imprisonment or both.
Link
So what I would like to know, is who supposedly ran this check? And also, how did they acquire the supposed legitimate social security number for the president? As far as I know the number is not public record. Answer those questions, and there will be a reason to answer your question.edit on 9/9/2012 by spleenika because: (no reason given)
evade the topic much?
You know you can follow along the approved path and just use the words: "nonsense"; "crazy"; "nutcase"; and then pullout the the big guns with the heavy hitter "RACISTS" more often.
Oh yeah as long as I am throwing you a few pointers: Try harder to feign moral outrage ! You know the "offended victim" card! You are not quite convincing enough...
Following the above steps: maintains the outward appearances of a "discussion"and steals the"moral high ground"at the same time!!.Now you just look like you are obviously deflecting the topic.
"Who did that? thats' "illegal"!( kinda Nancy like falsifying the ballot certification for her superman candidate?)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Drala
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by spleenika
reply to post by Thunderheart
Did you know it is actually illegal to use E-verify on someone who is not a direct employee of yours?
Anyone who knowingly and willfully uses SSNVS to request or obtain information from Social Security under false pretenses violates Federal law and may be punished by a fine, imprisonment or both.
Link
So what I would like to know, is who supposedly ran this check? And also, how did they acquire the supposed legitimate social security number for the president? As far as I know the number is not public record. Answer those questions, and there will be a reason to answer your question.edit on 9/9/2012 by spleenika because: (no reason given)
evade the topic much?
You know you can follow along the approved path and just use the words: "nonsense"; "crazy"; "nutcase"; and then pullout the the big guns with the heavy hitter "RACISTS" more often.
Oh yeah as long as I am throwing you a few pointers: Try harder to feign moral outrage ! You know the "offended victim" card! You are not quite convincing enough...
Following the above steps: maintains the outward appearances of a "discussion"and steals the"moral high ground"at the same time!!.Now you just look like you are obviously deflecting the topic.
"Who did that? thats' "illegal"!( kinda Nancy like falsifying the ballot certification for her superman candidate?)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 10-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)
Doesn't the president technically work for the people? I think any tax payer is entitled to look up someone on the taxpayers dollar...
...wait unless he doesn't work for the taxpayer...hmmmm
OMG! What is sad is YOU! never in my life have I witnessed such ignorant surety in the face of overwhelming evidence that you are flat out WRONG! In many quarters, this is a reflection of embracing IGNORANCE!
You stated "There's no requirement for US citizenship in Obama's case, other than being born in the US, and no law at all against dual citizens being President. Obviously. "
Try reading Article II of the US Constitution. Then read minor v. happersett. There is clearly more than just a law. It was ensconced in the FOUNDING DOCUMENT of this nation - the Constitution... OBVIOUSLY!