It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jhill76
reply to post by borntowatch
Your question though is upside down. It doesnt cost a little, it cost Jesus His life. It cost everything.
I know of these things more than you can fathom. My problem lies in the preachers who spew this nonsense, thus is my question. Not, the individual confessing it from the heart.
I must admit that I know nothing about Calvanism, but I don't think CARM is a Calvanist only site.
It is the position of CARM that once a person is saved he cannot lose his salvation.
Funny, i don't remember Jesus saying anything about mouthing any words to be saved. Many times he stressed the importance of believing in him to recieve salvation. In fact, if you had to mouth the words to be saved there'd be alot of deaf/mutes going to sheol and mentally handicaped folks and babies. He reads hearts and minds, if you confess in your heart and repent it's good enough. You acknowledge the conviction of the Holy Spirit.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Funny, i don't remember Jesus saying anything about mouthing any words to be saved. Many times he stressed the importance of believing in him to recieve salvation. In fact, if you had to mouth the words to be saved there'd be alot of deaf/mutes going to sheol and mentally handicaped folks and babies. He reads hearts and minds, if you confess in your heart and repent it's good enough. You acknowledge the conviction of the Holy Spirit.
You have a good point, but I thought Christians believed mouthing words was necessary to be saved.
Paul teaches....
If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved.
-Romans 10:9-10
So what now, are you disagreeing with Paul?
edit on 10-9-2012 by sk0rpi0n because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by jhill76
I think this line of thinking comes from Paul...
Faith saves people with help from the "grace" of God... Which seems to open the idea of having the golden ticket to sin. Also this "grace" was nothing taught by Jesus...
Either way i believe everyone is "saved" so to speak... religious "authorities" use fear tactics to scare people into their cults. "IF you're not with us... you'll burn"
I don't buy it
I do not mind Hitler being in heaven and not suffering as long as he has learned his lesson and behave in heaven and is fixing what he have caused.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Funny, i don't remember Jesus saying anything about mouthing any words to be saved. Many times he stressed the importance of believing in him to recieve salvation. In fact, if you had to mouth the words to be saved there'd be alot of deaf/mutes going to sheol and mentally handicaped folks and babies. He reads hearts and minds, if you confess in your heart and repent it's good enough. You acknowledge the conviction of the Holy Spirit.
You have a good point, but I thought Christians believed mouthing words was necessary to be saved.
Paul teaches....
If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved.
-Romans 10:9-10
So what now, are you disagreeing with Paul?
edit on 10-9-2012 by sk0rpi0n because: (no reason given)
Imagine if those trying to "save" us actually understood these teachings. This isn't a game where the one who gets the most people to say the right words gets the biggest prize.
The resolution of it for Catholics is to avoid sin, and to go to confession if one sins (as everyone will.) For Arminians, it is to maintain a relationship with Christ and to strive for sanctification. For Calvinists, it is to have had a validated conversion experience.
Of all three, only the last represents a "saved once, saved always" perspective, because the conversion experience only happens if one is, in fact, one of the Elect. Unfortunately, it is invalidated, a bit, but the observation that some Calvinists have, in fact, turned against the faith, in which case the interpretation is that "it wasn't really a valid conversion experience."
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
But surely you're not saying that accepting the grace of salvation is a license to sin? And if you're not, then what's the harm in actively trying NOT to sin?
A lot of these matters come down to semantics and rationalization, but if the response to someone who, after having what was deemed a valid conversion experience, went out and killed a bunch of people is "well, that means it wasn't a valid experience," there isn't a lot of credence that we can put into the claim, is there?
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
But surely you're not saying that accepting the grace of salvation is a license to sin? And if you're not, then what's the harm in actively trying NOT to sin?
A lot of these matters come down to semantics and rationalization, but if the response to someone who, after having what was deemed a valid conversion experience, went out and killed a bunch of people is "well, that means it wasn't a valid experience," there isn't a lot of credence that we can put into the claim, is there?
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
But surely you're not saying that accepting the grace of salvation is a license to sin? And if you're not, then what's the harm in actively trying NOT to sin?
A lot of these matters come down to semantics and rationalization, but if the response to someone who, after having what was deemed a valid conversion experience, went out and killed a bunch of people is "well, that means it wasn't a valid experience," there isn't a lot of credence that we can put into the claim, is there?
It's not a license for licentiousness, but we have to recognize that even with a changed spirit we are still subject to temptation in these corrupted forms and we do fall and sometimes we fall alot and fall hard, but the important thing is to not throw in the towel, but keep moving forward in the assurance that we will be forgiven if we do stumble. There will be a great change in a person's spirit when they have a true salvation experience and they will not want to murder 5 people and i speak this from my own experience. Even the thought of harming another person is horrifying to me and it's been a major issue as to why i do not own firearms, taking a life is worse than stealing, because you can't return what you've stolen, it's not something you can ever undo and it's a line i would find very difficult to cross and is why i didn't last long in law enforcement.
I have sinned against You, my Lord, and I would ask that Your Precious Blood would wash and cleanse every stain until it is in the seas of God's forgiveness, not to be remembered against me anymore.