reply to post by AussieAmandaC
There is also nothing wrong with strong moral convictions of which you live by, the issues always arise when you try to force that kind of moral code
down throats at force, or carry yourself with a sense of higher moral living looking down over another whom is built just like you on the inside.
That's a moot point. If I have a different morality from you, it's because I think it is a better one, no?? And you - the opposite of me, with your
relativism, think the same haughty thoughts you accuse me of, in relation to me...no?? OH!
How the cookie crumbles both ways.
In anycase, nature is at a natural advantage, as I've already said. To just 'accept everything' is something incredibly and exceedingly easy to do.
No law need be enacted; in fact, in your private life, you can flout every moral law like the bacchae for all I care. But when It comes to preserving
MY morality, it is a NECESSITY that there be physical concrete institutions in place to preserve. Otherwise, my belief system and my morality will
fade away. That's just how it is.
Something also tells me you know it, but just don't care.
Abuse of power comes in all forms as well, to label the woman and her inherent, inherited energy to blame for the masculine species getting out of
control is the first step to trying to cage and conform that femanine aspect, again.
That feminine aspect is naturally dominant; thus, man - a symbol for that outside influence, and so, themselves reflecting the 'masculine energy',
imposes order in order to bring balance to the creation.
How can you fail to see the beauty in that conception?
That story is getting very boring indeed, and you're basically saying God got it wrong with women (?!)
No, not at all. The biblical conception is this: Man is a co-creator with God. God provided the basic creation - the feminine, or primal ground
(prima materia). Man, in his part, is to bring order to this prima materia by enacting laws which preserve his inner freedom from external factors.
So, man ADDS to nature. He adds, both in his technological and scientific understanding, as well as in his moral and ethical understanding. Man is a
surplus to the natural order.
You are wrong on a few points, at least from my prospective, woman can be 'played' just as easily as a man when in a suitably sensitive/heightened
state, to say otherwise really only says something about yourself.
If you've followed my posts, I acknowledged that. The difference is intensity and frequency. Man, on the whole, is at the disadvantage. He's mostly
at the whim of woman, not the other way around.
As John Adams said, and as any many rightly knows, a woman exercises an esoteric power over his thinking. Yet you deny it.
as indeed since you profess men are so weak they also can not be held accountable?
Ok, lets get something clear. A man who violates a woman is a rapist and deserves a very harsh punishment in my opinion.
What I'm referring to is purely psychological.
I have an entirely different prospective of men than the one in which you portray, you would seem to me to be struggling with a few personal issues,
which are not mine to list.
Or, I'm just very aware of my self. I am extremely self aware.
Just look at the sex industry. Look at the strip clubs, massage parlors, escort agencies, all catering to male perversity. If my thinking strikes any
of you as 'weird' perhaps its due to my actual understanding of the world we live in - to a natural mans weakness before his sexual urge. Everywhere
it is catered to. And if men aren't satisfied with females, then its other men they succumb to.
There is also much 'undirected' anger in your words.
I have no idea what you mean by 'undirected' anger. It's hard to really infer in what mood people speak in online. I've never been angry with
anyone here. I'm annoyed with the issue at hand, but I try hard to argue rationally and calmly.
When you underestimate a 5" Police woman, one wonders what else you have underestimated, and we are not all witches in the negative sense either.
So you took offense to that as well? That seems to be common sense. A 5 foot cop is no good at being a cop. I would say this about a man or a woman.
They are simply ineffective.