It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ghost375
Saying the aurora shooting is an inside job makes no damn sense.
At least when people say 9/11 was an inside job, it doesn't sound absolutely ridiculous and makes sense.
Now if you want to say he had an accomplice, fine. But don't say it was an inside job. That's not the correct terminology. even if you think TPTB were behind it, it's still not an "inside job."
Originally posted by CinnamonHearts
reply to post by thesungod
Who knows at this point. For all we know, it's the work of the judge. Maybe it's a poster from forums such as this one, who is pretending to a victim or "victim"...along the lines of Bonnie Kate Pourciau? A lot of people don't think she was really shot that night. I do wonder why they've started blacking out the names in these though. Is it because they're COMPLETELY fake? And there is no real person filling the motion?
This looks fairly similar to the latest motion. Obviously, she wasn't on the victim list though.
allisonmichelleernst.blogspot.ca...edit on 10-9-2012 by CinnamonHearts because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thesungod
reply to post by Ghost375
Please read the WHOLE THREAD before posting.
You obviously haven't read it,
Originally posted by smurfy
I'm wondering if the judges remarks about the filers sanity, and putting the filer away is something that he would be qualified to say in his official capacity? Not really, he would need a second opinion for that, there has already been a cock-up with Brandon Raub, and crazy law about crazyiness. Not that I think all that much about the Examiners take on things, with the secondhand remarks about different James Holmes photographs being of different people, just to sex up the story, but that is what the press and TV and other media do, mainstream or otherwise, mainstream just have to be more careful, although they were woeful over 9/11, and still are, constantly re-representing the events. While there are certain areas similar to what Anders Breivik did, there are differences, Breivik was persistent in what he did and unhurried, and has been found to be sane, as he said he was. Holmes was more hit-and run, and having a totally captive audience initially, while it is unclear if Holmes himself has questioned his sanity, before or after his actions.
Originally posted by thesungod
reply to post by telemetry
You should read the whole thread before posting.
This Court has information that the named victim, REDACTED, did not file this pleading, and it appears that someone may be filing pleadings with false names.
Okay so your saying YPL (or whomever) dressed up like a female or got a female to risk jail time, got a fake ID for Carli Richards, fooled a notary public or a lawyer, or got one to jeopardize their license (admittedly not hard to get a notary license, but this carries serious jail time,) and filed this pleading? Which was also considered by several people (at least two clerks and then the Judge) for at least a week before being turned out?
Maybe it was put out there to try to convince the public that anyone questioning things in this case is just a nutcase,