It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mamabeth
reply to post by ldyserenity
The only bad thing about getting a lawyer is,the lawyer will probably
get most of any settlement.
Originally posted by deckdel
Potentially: seek the other similar complainants for the same bank, and issue class action suite against the bank, due to their unlawful practices, severe discrepancies in due diligence, and lack of controls for assuring actual ownership for the properties (and which properties are actually the case).
And for that reason already, the class action should be raised, and the bank brought back to civil order.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Let me see here. Wells Fargo hires a CONTRACTOR to handle it's foreclosures. The CONTRACTOR goes too the wrong address. The CONTRACTOR trashes the place and removes the couple's possessions. The CONTRACTOR loses the couple's possessions. Why are we blaming Wells Fargo? I know. They are an EVIL bank, they make a PROFIT.
Give me a break. Blame the CONTRACTOR. They are the ones who screwed up. They are the ones who are liable.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Let me see here. Wells Fargo hires a CONTRACTOR to handle it's foreclosures. The CONTRACTOR goes too the wrong address. The CONTRACTOR trashes the place and removes the couple's possessions. The CONTRACTOR loses the couple's possessions. Why are we blaming Wells Fargo? I know. They are an EVIL bank, they make a PROFIT.
Give me a break. Blame the CONTRACTOR. They are the ones who screwed up. They are the ones who are liable.
Subcontractors hired by the bank broke doors, smashed windows and stole valuables while foreclosing the couple's vacation home near Twentynine Palms
Originally posted by ollncasino
Banks treat people like this simply because they can. They think they are above the law.