It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cartenz
Originally posted by beezzer
...
In tv we can also change the channel, or turn it off.
When I first quit television, and encountered one that was on (two examples I will use are: at a friends place or the court waiting rooms), I would, without saying anything just switch (or unplug) the television. People were often irrationally angered by this action.
In one instance when I arrived at a friends place and did this his objection was "Hey I was watching that!". No. I explained the whole concept of social interaction and that the purpose of my visit was not to sit and watch television. I explained that if the TV set was a person in this environment (my friends shed he lived in), this person would spent try to dominate the conversation, tell us about topics we dont care about, not listen or even acknowledge our input, then try and sell us products we neither want nor need. This seemed to cause a great deal of offence, I fail to fully understand why. My logic was sound...
In the court-house waiting room however, my action of unplugging the television was met with a threat of prosecution and the re-activation of the television set....
People get pretty upset when you turn their TV off. After the court incident I stopped doing it
Originally posted by kat2684
OP I only watched tv to see the debates and Ron Paul...thats it.
However, I caved last night to watch "Breaking Amish"....after watching the first show (curious about Amish culture) I can't watch it any more....its proving to be the Amish jersey Shore.
I want something of substance, I miss watching the National Geographic Presents, Jacques Cousteau, and heck even Bob Ross and other educational programing with my grandpa as a kid....My kids 6 and 8 actually sat through WW2 in HD with me on the History Channel, usually its countless reruns of Pawn Stars, and everyone from that show getting a show......mindless dumbed down entertainment, with the doting Chum Lee distracting the audience from learning anything of historical value.
Originally posted by kudegras
reply to post by Astyanax
I agree I rarely watch the idiot box anymore, I remember my Dad telling me in the early 70's when I was growing up that the idiot box would rot my brain. And I tell my 17 year old daughter the same thing, although she also has an Iphone, an Xbox, a laptop, an ipad you name it, she's got it.
So effectively its not just TV, its all the diversionary gadgets geared to entertain you and stop you using the old grey matter.
Its all part of the plan. Dumb us down and entertain us.
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
I'm approaching this from a parents point of view (three boys, one girl), I get to play dictator in my house and I have banned television long ago. We have no videogames and Internet is allowed under strict supervision and only if it is nessecary for educational purposes. To be honest, the difference between them and their nephews and nieces is amazing!!
From time to time I also let them get bored because I have this theory that it stimulates their imagination.......I'm weird, I know.
Am I a boring farther? Maybe, but my job is not to be friends with my kids, my job is to get them ready for the real world. And the real world is not happening on the television.
Peaceedit on 10-9-2012 by operation mindcrime because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by Iwinder
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Astyanax
There would have been a time where I would have agreed with you, OP. But that time has passed. Just a brief glimpse of the intraweb stands testiment Intrawebz is the tv now. TV is no better or no worse than the materials displayed on the screen.
Where does ATS get much of its material? TV, internet, MSM.
Here we disect the cadaver left for us by the media outlets. We carve away the fat, toss out the useless offal and proudly display the hidden gem that was hidden.
A ban on tv would not eliminate the needless garbage, because many would just turn to www-dot-tv for their mind candy.
Instead, might I suggest refining the filter used when exposed to the outlets of media.
cheers,
beez
I agree but I disagree also, let me try and make sense here.
TV (a medium we gave up almost 20 years ago) feeds you the information.
The internet is a whole different ball game, you actually get to pick and choose what you read and if you are like us you suffer no advertising whatsoever at all.
Regards, Iwinder.....read my signature below
In tv we can also change the channel, or turn it off.
TextSecond, and I’ll get altruistic here, I think that knowing about advertising is crucial to anyone living in the modern, Western world. Some statistics indicate that Americans see an average of 8.5 hours of TV a day. On average, that is 136 TV commercials in a day. On top of that, we see over 1600 ads, logos, and product placements in any given day. Those come from bumper stickers, vending machines, t-shirts, super markets, bus benches, or just about anywhere we look ever. In fact, in most rooms of any given house you can count dozens of logos and brand names making up the invisible white noise of our environment. With this proliferation of advertising in our lives, it is crucial that we understand how they work. The best psychologists and profilers in the world are hired by the advertising firms on Madison Avenue to get into our heads. Nothing in an ad is accidental, and it is all designed to manipulate us, to mold our behavior and make us consume. I hope you’ll take from this lecture and our Media and Message readings, a solid understanding of how we’re manipulated by our very environment to consume. Advertising uses several methods to get into our heads, and below, I’ll list several of them. Learn them, not just for your class, but for your sanity!
Originally posted by cartenz
Originally posted by RealSpoke
The internet is the thing creating all the crazy baseless conspiracy theories, not the TV.
Conspiracy theories happened prior to the mass uptake of the world wide web, the difference with TV is that its a one-way communication, so if the network tells you its a "baseless conspiracy theory" you have no forum to address the charge. Online we have the luxury of having a multi-way discourse where ideas can be shared and developed--this scares those in the traditional media who took it upon themselves to shape public policy by manipulating the dominant reading of current events.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Now here's something I think we can all agree on, sceptics and conspiracy fans alike.
As those who've read my posts know, I'm what some of you would call a sceptic (others may prefer ruder names). I don't believe in the conspiracy theories so earnestly discussed on this web site, though I enjoy reading the discussions, and like to stir the pot myself on occasion, just for the fun of it.
Conspiracy theories have always been big in American popular culture – and right now, they seem to be bigger than they've ever been. They are no longer the obsession of a small, tinfoil-hatted minority; they've gone mainstream, and not just in the US either. They've gone global. They've gone mass market. They've gone mass media.
They've gone television.
And it's been happening for a long time. On TV, today, is where most conspiracy believers first encounter their pet conspiracies – sometimes in fictional form (e.g. The X-Files), sometimes as credulous 'documentaries' (stand up, History Channel and Discovery Channel, and take your bows), sometimes as paranoid ravings on talk shows like Jerry Springer's. Any of you can provide better and more contemporary examples than I just did; I don't watch television, you see, so I don't keep up.
But while conspiracy-specific programming has had its part to play, the mainstreaming of tinfoil hattery by television is actually the result of something a lot more insidious: the widespread confusion, now evident among conspiracy theorists and ordinary viewers alike, between television and reality.
I suppose I once helped cause this confusion; I am a former advertising executive, after all. But during my 25-odd years in advertising, I always believed that consumers and TV audiences were more intelligent and perceptive than they were given credit for. I held fast, as many admen of my era did, to David Ogilvy's famous dictum: 'The consumer is not a moron; she is your wife.'
Sadly, I have lost my faith in that statement. I can no longer attribute much intelligence to the average consumer, the average TV viewer. It has become appallingly obvious that habitual TV viewing by three generations of the general public has produced a world in which most people can't tell the difference between the sensationalised, consumerised, art-directed world of television and mass media, and the actual, physical reality their bodies inhabit – the reality of the objects and creatures around them, of actual events occurring within the range of their own five senses.
When people find the news on TV is as real to them as what is happening in their own backyards, when they think the gadgets and ideas sold to them by the media are as important as the concerns and relationships that feature in their own lives, they lose their anchors. Clueless and foundering, they will believe anything, grasp at any straw. They will support the most bizarre conspiracy theories, such as the claim that the Aurora theatre shooting was the work of the local police chief in cahoots with the Illuminati. :shk:
The world is full of real problems. When the general public takes leave of reality, it just makes it harder to solve those problems. Conspiracy theorists, of course, recognise this; here on ATS, they assert it all the time. Of course, in the view of sceptics like myself, it is they who have lost their grip on reality.
Be that as it may, you have even more reason to agree with me if you are a conspiracy theorist. Isn't the mainstream media the source of all misinformation, distraction and mindless noise, the tool most favoured by the Illuminati/NWO/Rotschilds/Masons/Jews/Bilderburgers/Bohemian Grove perverts/(your choice of fiend here) when they seek to bamboozle and distract the masses?
Well, then, let's get rid of it, so that the sheeple won't have to graze on lies and propaganda any more, and will be forced to see the truth of that aliens-abducted-Obama's-birth-certificate theory you've been researching all these years! I may laugh in the face of your theory, but on this, I'm with you: it's time to slay the dragon.
So come with me, friends, and let's strike at the very root of the evil: let's get rid of television, this monster of misinformation. Let's ban the box and get people back to the real world, before we all float off on a tinfoil cloud of misinformation, misconception and false aspiration for ever.
Come on, ATS! Let's all speak with one voice for a change. All together now...
BAN! THE!! BOX!!!
edit on 9/9/12 by Astyanax because: of edits.