It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by beezzer
...
Yes, there's bad stuff on the internet, too. But the value of the internet is rather obvious. We put up with its faults in order to gain access to the good stuff. Where's the 'good stuff' on television? Sports programming, maybe?
The quality of the output from various television channels and systems is often discussed but seldom rated or measured in any systematic way. However, due to a Japanese initiative undertaken some years ago, an international group of scholars met and decided to undertake comparative studies of television quality in terms of a characteristic often regarded as basic to overall channel quality: the diversity of a given television channel. An instrument of measurement was designed by a member of the international team and applied to television content from Canada, Great Britain, Japan, Sweden and the United States. This article presents a follow-up study, comparing diversity in Swedish television and radio channels during 1992 to 1995. The results show that Swedish Television increased its diversity during this period, while Swedish Radio decreased its diversity. At the end of the article, a short discussion of potential developments with regard to digitalized television is presented.
Originally posted by Taupin Desciple
reply to post by Astyanax
Define quality. Ask ten different people and you'll likely get ten different answers. Here's one definition:
The quality of the output from various television channels and systems is often discussed but seldom rated or measured in any systematic way. However, due to a Japanese initiative undertaken some years ago, an international group of scholars met and decided to undertake comparative studies of television quality in terms of a characteristic often regarded as basic to overall channel quality: the diversity of a given television channel. An instrument of measurement was designed by a member of the international team and applied to television content from Canada, Great Britain, Japan, Sweden and the United States. This article presents a follow-up study, comparing diversity in Swedish television and radio channels during 1992 to 1995. The results show that Swedish Television increased its diversity during this period, while Swedish Radio decreased its diversity. At the end of the article, a short discussion of potential developments with regard to digitalized television is presented.
Source
Now if they can only do this in America using all available channels as the source for their study. In other words, instead of focusing on one channel looking for diversity, look for diversity among all channels combined. If you have ten channels that are simply variations on the same theme, like History for example, there's no quality there because there's no diversity of subjects.
If you're looking at MTV for quality in broadcasting, it's no wonder you're bemoaning the state of television. It's like living somewhere and complaining there are no quality men or women (whatever your preference) there, when all you're focusing on is one type of person. Expand your horizons and you'll find good things to watch.
edit on 9-9-2012 by Taupin Desciple because: (no reason given)edit on 9-9-2012 by Taupin Desciple because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Astyanax
So come with me, friends, and let's strike at the very root of the evil: let's get rid of television, this monster of misinformation. Let's ban the box and get people back to the real world, before we all float off on a tinfoil cloud of misinformation, misconception and false aspiration for ever.
Come on, ATS! Let's all speak with one voice for a change. All together now...
BAN! THE!! BOX!!!
Originally posted by jcarpenter
Originally posted by Astyanax
So come with me, friends, and let's strike at the very root of the evil: let's get rid of television, this monster of misinformation. Let's ban the box and get people back to the real world, before we all float off on a tinfoil cloud of misinformation, misconception and false aspiration for ever.
Come on, ATS! Let's all speak with one voice for a change. All together now...
BAN! THE!! BOX!!!
TV has seriously damaged our people and there is no doubt that it is being used to herd and control us. I turned off satellite about 4 years ago and only occasionally regret it. But TV does not need to be banned, it needs to be reformed.
Consider: For every channel run by the corporations, the corporations should be required to operate 3 other 24-hour-channels in the public interest. These public interest channels should be themed in approved subjects with zero advertising or subliminals.
Some possible subjects:
1) the repair channel (A/C and heating repair, appliance repair, house repair and improvement, auto repair, etc)
2) the arts and humanities channel (art movements, theatre movements, sculpture movements)
3) the exercise channel (aerobics, dance classes, weight lifting, self defence)
4) the clothes channel (making, repairing and modifying clothes and shoes)
5) the gardening/farming channel (running farms for dairy, meat and veggies, aquaponics, hydroponics, food safety)
6) the wood shop/metal shop channel (carpentry, machine shop, sheet metal)
7) life sciences (practical math, practicable budgeting, planning skills, etc)
8) non-corporate news channels
Just a thought......
Originally posted by jcarpenter
Originally posted by Astyanax
So come with me, friends, and let's strike at the very root of the evil: let's get rid of television, this monster of misinformation. Let's ban the box and get people back to the real world, before we all float off on a tinfoil cloud of misinformation, misconception and false aspiration for ever.
Come on, ATS! Let's all speak with one voice for a change. All together now...
BAN! THE!! BOX!!!
TV has seriously damaged our people and there is no doubt that it is being used to herd and control us. I turned off satellite about 4 years ago and only occasionally regret it. But TV does not need to be banned, it needs to be reformed.
Consider: For every channel run by the corporations, the corporations should be required to operate 3 other 24-hour-channels in the public interest. These public interest channels should be themed in approved subjects with zero advertising or subliminals.
Some possible subjects:
1) the repair channel (A/C and heating repair, appliance repair, house repair and improvement, auto repair, etc)
2) the arts and humanities channel (art movements, theatre movements, sculpture movements)
3) the exercise channel (aerobics, dance classes, weight lifting, self defence)
4) the clothes channel (making, repairing and modifying clothes and shoes)
5) the gardening/farming channel (running farms for dairy, meat and veggies, aquaponics, hydroponics, food safety)
6) the wood shop/metal shop channel (carpentry, machine shop, sheet metal)
7) life sciences (practical math, practicable budgeting, planning skills, etc)
8) non-corporate news channels
Just a thought......
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by beezzer
Sorry to be difficult, but your reply didn't really answer my question.
What, if anything, is the value of television, if the information it conveys is mostly false or distorted?
Should we keep it for its entertainment value?
Yes, there's bad stuff on the internet, too. But the value of the internet is rather obvious. We put up with its faults in order to gain access to the good stuff. Where's the 'good stuff' on television? Sports programming, maybe?
According to TV-Free America, a national not-for-profit organization, our children are exposed to more than 20,000 thirty second commercials each year. While an average American youth spends about 900 hours in school each year, the same child may watch up to 1,500 hours of television that same year. Even though not all programming is necessarily a bad influence on our kids’ development, I couldn't help but wonder what kind of long-term effects this kind of screen time would have on my daughter.
Originally posted by MrSpad
...
Many of those have channels much like that. The problem is nobody watches them an they become something that gets better ratings. And their still are channels like that I find them up in the 9000s.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Astyanax
There would have been a time where I would have agreed with you, OP. But that time has passed. Just a brief glimpse of the intraweb stands testiment Intrawebz is the tv now. TV is no better or no worse than the materials displayed on the screen.
Where does ATS get much of its material? TV, internet, MSM.
Here we disect the cadaver left for us by the media outlets. We carve away the fat, toss out the useless offal and proudly display the hidden gem that was hidden.
A ban on tv would not eliminate the needless garbage, because many would just turn to www-dot-tv for their mind candy.
Instead, might I suggest refining the filter used when exposed to the outlets of media.
cheers,
beez
Originally posted by Terminal1
NNOOOOoooo.......!!!
At least wait till NCAA Football season is over! It is really the only real reason I watch TV and the season just started!!!
What will I do with these huge bags of chicken wings if TV was banned?? They will not be as enjoyable without them being made into Buffalo Wings on game day!!
No bans yet!! I promise not to watch the commercials!!
/sniff.. sniff...
/kicks at stone on ground...
/sniff...
Should we keep it for its entertainment value?
If you're looking at MTV for quality in broadcasting, it's no wonder you're bemoaning the state of television.
There is value in television.