It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by murphy22
reply to post by SplitInfinity
The only "Fact" Science has proven is the building blocks of life exist. If evolution was a "Fact" they would have found "the missing link" they're still hunting for. They have found how many of those? Like three or something and they always make the old link not the missing one.
So Scientist have created life in a lab. Big deal! How do they explain life thousands of years ago without laboratories? Oh, thats right. A galactic explosion.
The complex DNA you mention...... How about the RNA, you know the stuff that Scientist said "served no purpose" and is "junk DNA" The same Stuff Scientist have just changed their mind about.
If Science had "facts" Their would be no "new discovery" to refute yesterdays "facts"
Don't get me wrong Science is fun and helpful and there are some "facts" that have been learned. But the origin or creation of life is not one of them. Proof would be how it got here, not that it's here and they can play with it.
edit on 8-9-2012 by murphy22 because: spelling error
Wikipedia: Torah
Most modern biblical scholars believe that the written books were a product of the Babylonian exilic period (c. 600 BCE) and that it was completed by the Persian period (c. 400 BCE).[5]
Wikipedia: Enuma Elish
The Enûma Eliš exists in various copies from Babylon and Assyria. The version from Ashurbanipal's library dates to the 7th century BCE. The composition of the text probably dates to the Bronze Age, to the time of Hammurabi or perhaps the early Kassite era (roughly 18th to 16th centuries BCE), although some scholars favour a later date of ca. 1100 BCE.[2]
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
What I have posted is FACT...and can be easily confirmed. It is everyone's Right to have their own beliefs...
"The model of human prehistory built-up by scholars over the past two centuries is sadly and completely wrong, and a deliberate tool of disinformation and mind control. ...they demonstrate a systematic destruction of proofs that show another reality than that the official story. Falsifications and even destruction of such proofs has been common for more than two hundred years." LINK
"It would take days to begin to explain how much false evidence has been put forward as proof for Evolution."
What part of Evolution is a lie?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
This is the definition of Science.
I would suggest you stop making yourself look silly. LOL!
Originally posted by Murgatroid
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
This is the definition of Science.
I would suggest you stop making yourself look silly. LOL!
By throwing out dictionary definitions as if they have ANYTHING to do with reality not only are you making YOURSELF look extremely silly, you make it VERY clear that either you are not interested in the truth or you are completely blinded to it because of years of mind control propaganda.
Originally posted by TarzanBeta
We shouldn't also have to debate the science of food and health. If anyone had done any of their research regarding food then they would know how nutrients are processed. Meat-eating started as a result of sin. The earth was cursed on account of the sin of Adam. The first animal was killed as a sacrifice by Jesus Christ so that He could make clothes for Adam and Eve. And so it began - the first animal sacrifice to hide the sins (nakedness) of mankind. That animal that was sacrificed was a lamb and was a foreshadowing of the Mosaic Law and further a foreshadowing of the sacrifice of the Lamb of God Himself, Jesus Christ. It was by the blood of the lamb that Adam and Eve's nakedness was covered. It would be by the blood of the Lamb of God Himself that Mankind's nakedness would be covered. Adam and Eve accepted that sacrifice for clothing. We accept the Lord's sacrifice for our nakedness. But meat-eating began as a ritual to remember that sacrifice - and because of the blood of animals being spilled into the earth, the earth become more cursed with it; and also animals began to desire blood as well.
Excuse me Tarzan, but I think sacrificing animals as burnt offerins is a barbaric practice. Where is the loving god that cares for all living creatures?
I do agree that the christ consciousness is the mediator, because I have experienced it, but where does it say in the OT that the animal sacrifice has anything to do with the christ?
Originally posted by axslinger
You can't debunk such a thing unless the mind is open to the Truth. Unfortunately, most atheists minds are sealed tighter than Fort Knox.
True enlightenment is the opening of the mind to the Truth, regardless of what that Truth may be. When one can dissolve the ego and seek only the Truth, regardless of its implications, you will truly be free. When you no longer have an interest in what the Truth is, but only with to know the Truth, then reality will unfold before you.
There are a couple thing I can suggest watching, both on NetFlix. One is called, "A Case for Christ" and the other is a 3 or 4 part series called "Amazing Creatures that Defy Evolution". If one can watch these and still deny God and Jesus Christ, they are simply at such a low level of evolution that they aren't capable of seeing beyond the limitations of their own ego. They are effectively slaves to themselves, not interested in Truth but only interested in being "right". The writings of David Hawkins goes into the evolution of consciousness and the limitations put on humankind by the ego.
As I see it, most of mankind isn't interested in the Truth, they are only interested in "winning" or "being right", regardless of whether or not there is any Truth in their beliefs. Most people can't fathom the thought of putting aside their ego and considering that they may in fact be wrong or misguided or they may have not been seeing the "big picture" causing them to hold erroneous beliefs. Think about the number of people you encounter everyday who have that attitude; they're right and everybody else is wrong and nobody is going to tell them any different.
My point of all this is that there's nothing you can say or do that is going to get through to these people you speak of. Evolution of consciousness isn't something that you convince somebody to do; it's something they choose to do and it can take years.
Originally posted by OrphenFire
These "inconsistencies" show a great ignorance of biblical content and Judaic & Christian Theology.
I am an atheist and I can tell you right now that most of these are simply nitpicking and looking for a reason to make fun of the bible. But hey, to each their own...