posted on Sep, 7 2012 @ 09:47 PM
reply to post by thehoneycomb
soooo, are you suggesting heterosexual couples that are not capable of re-producing shouldn't be allowed to marry ?
since "family" seems to be your stated "goal" of the marital union, those who cannot produce one shouldn't be allowed to marry either, right
what exactly are you saying here ?
marriage (for as long as it's been around) used to be between 2 families, not just 2 individuals.
marriage in the USA was pre-determined by a body of thinkers who were deft, color-blind and often prejudiced in many of their decisions. are you
suggesting they were right all along ??
personally, i find the whole "benefit package" associated with being married, UnConstitutional.
there should not be any State sponsored benefit targeted to any specific group of people ... for any reason ... when there is, it is at best
imbalanced and at worst, discriminatory.