Let's Revoke The Rights and Protections Awarded to Heterosexual Married Couples, page 23


Pages: <<  20    21    22    23    24    25  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 29 times


reply posted on 11-9-2012 @ 11:55 AM by kaylaluv
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to
post by kaylaluv



I believe that

it is YOUR BELIEF

that sexual orientation is not a choice.

That's like saying that someone who's 20% left handed has no choice about being left handed.

The best summaries of the hard, WELL DONE research suggests that the TOTAL predisposition toward homosexuality from gestational hormonal factors to whatever genetically determined predispositions--THE TOTAL IS MERELY contributes 10-20% of the variance contributing to homosexuality.

Any BELIEFS to the contrary are NOT BASED on SCIENCE,

BUT ON DOGMA, BELIEF.


NO, it's a fact - you do NOT choose who you are attracted to. You DO choose who you have sex with.

Interesting study on pupil dilation revealing sexual orientation. So, this study implies that a person's pupils dilate when they are aroused. You can't control your pupils anymore than you can control who you are attracted to.
I'd like to see an analysis of your pupils

www.sciencedaily.com...


reply posted on 16-9-2012 @ 01:34 AM by GreatOwl
Originally posted by Annee

Children as young as 3 - - recognize they don't fit gender stereotype. They know they are different - - they don't necessarily know why.

Its how they were born.


They don't know. We tell them who they are. We dress the girls up in pink, and the boys in blue. We program them from very young to be socially female or socially male. So they learn all the cues from us, the adults. But more and more parents are neglecting their roles as parents, being too busy earning a living, and more and more leave their kids to others to look after, and various outside influences affect the children of today. They watch TV, they get ideas and impulses from many unhealthy sources, and they "pick" a role that they fancy, not knowing how the idea entered their head, whether subliminally or directly by suggestion of some deviant adult.

We don't generally accept the testimony of children on the stand in court, because they make things up, and can be influenced easily by "suggestion".

Friends and neighbors can "suggest" to a boy child that he would make a good "girl" and that alone could influence the kid to "pick" a role that someone suggested. It's like hypnosis. Some are more susceptible to suggestion than others. And the suggestions come from many directions. The parents do not know where their kids get all their ideas from, and are often shocked to hear their own children use some swear word, etc.., because parents are not around all the time. They are too busy today, to be there influencing their own kids 24/7. In the old days, there was at least one parent at home looking after the young. So, few strayed into unnatural territory.


reply posted on 16-9-2012 @ 06:02 AM by kaylaluv
Originally posted by GreatOwl
Originally posted by Annee

Children as young as 3 - - recognize they don't fit gender stereotype. They know they are different - - they don't necessarily know why.

Its how they were born.


They don't know. We tell them who they are. We dress the girls up in pink, and the boys in blue. We program them from very young to be socially female or socially male. So they learn all the cues from us, the adults. But more and more parents are neglecting their roles as parents, being too busy earning a living, and more and more leave their kids to others to look after, and various outside influences affect the children of today. They watch TV, they get ideas and impulses from many unhealthy sources, and they "pick" a role that they fancy, not knowing how the idea entered their head, whether subliminally or directly by suggestion of some deviant adult.

We don't generally accept the testimony of children on the stand in court, because they make things up, and can be influenced easily by "suggestion".

Friends and neighbors can "suggest" to a boy child that he would make a good "girl" and that alone could influence the kid to "pick" a role that someone suggested. It's like hypnosis. Some are more susceptible to suggestion than others. And the suggestions come from many directions. The parents do not know where their kids get all their ideas from, and are often shocked to hear their own children use some swear word, etc.., because parents are not around all the time. They are too busy today, to be there influencing their own kids 24/7. In the old days, there was at least one parent at home looking after the young. So, few strayed into unnatural territory.



Sorry, but this post is BS. What about all the homosexuals who were born in the "old days", back when there was no TV, and mom stayed home? Back when boys were boys, and girls were girls -- there were still homosexuals. I know gays who were born in the fifties, with very traditional families and lots of siblings, and they knew from the time they were very little that they were just .... different. They weren't treated any differently, the difference was inside them all along.


reply posted on 16-9-2012 @ 01:13 PM by kaylaluv
Originally posted by truthermantwo
Can same sex couples produce babies within a family line...nope.
see the rewards come from having children and helping them live a life of maturity and understanding.
All i hear from same sex choicers is whining and crying. Their psychology is one of rebellion and selfishness.
Their disease rate is higher, their break up rate is higher. Just think of the potential divorce rate among same sex marriages, you think it's bad among hetero-couples? BTW in my youth I was not a heterosexual, but life has taught me lessons. So don't think im not speaking from experience.


Can barren heterosexual couples produce babies within a family line? Nope, so what?

Many homosexual couples raise children in a loving home and help them live a life of maturity and understanding.

All I hear from haters of gays is whining and crying that marriage is being taken away from them -- the haters are selfish, and not willing to share the term "marriage".

Hollywood's celebrity break-up rate is higher than anyone else's in the world. And yet, they can still get a marriage license whenever they want -- as many times as they want. You know why that's ok? Because it's nobody else's business.

In your youth, you were probably just experimenting. It happens with a lot of heterosexual youths. Experimenting doesn't make you a homosexual.
edit on 16-9-2012 by kaylaluv because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 17-9-2012 @ 03:28 PM by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by Annee



I've never considered EQUALITY an entitlement.


Yes you have.

don't even pretend.


Explain exactly why you think it is a part of the Federal Government's Jurisdiction to apply laws (Such as the tax code) differently to various people, based solely on their relationship status?



You think that "Equality" is only for people in a relationship.

And you refuse to fight for the "Equality" of single people.

Also, stop using the word "Right", because you don't seem to understand what it means.


reply posted on 17-9-2012 @ 04:35 PM by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by Annee



That is a different subject discussion.

EQUAL is same as what exists right now.


Would you like to state the name of this topic?


reply posted on 17-9-2012 @ 05:21 PM by Annee
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to
post by Annee



That is a different subject discussion.

EQUAL is same as what exists right now.


Would you like to state the name of this topic?


I know what the topic is about.

If gays can't have equal rights - - - revoke The Rights and Protections Awarded to Heterosexual Married Couples.

Its about EQUAL.

Feel free to go ask all the married people you know - - if they are willing to give up all the "Rights and Protections" of Legal Government marriage.


reply posted on 17-9-2012 @ 06:38 PM by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by Annee



Feel free to go ask all the married people you know - - if they are willing to give up all the "Rights and Protections" of Legal Government marriage.


And convincing the religious right to grant this *PRIVILEGE* to homosexual couples is easier then?

And yes... it is a privilege, not a right.

A Privilege, I might add, that is wholly unconstitutional.


reply posted on 17-9-2012 @ 06:53 PM by EvilSadamClone
reply to post by ErtaiNaGia



Marriage is unconstitutional?

Are you one of those kinds of guys that says that if it's not mentioned in the Constitution then it is illegal and therefore must be gotten rid of? There is a train of thought out there that goes something like the only legal things that can happen are stated in the constitution, anything else must not be allowed to happen ebcause they are illegal for not being in the constitution?


reply posted on 17-9-2012 @ 07:02 PM by peck420
reply to post by EvilSadamClone



I believe s/he was referring to the fact that any Federal government involvement in marriage, heterosexual or homosexual, is overstepping the boundaries of the Constitution.

Theoretically, it is something that should be only dealt with on the State level, but meh, it is really one of the minor oversteps.

edit on 17-9-2012 by peck420 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  20    21    22    23    24    25  >>    ^^TOP^^