Firstly 1991 is 12 years ago, much has changed since then. Although NKorea may not have advanced much since then, America certainly has.
The article appears to assume that America and Korea are equals in nucleur strength... This is obviously wrong, even if NKorea managed to get one
through the resulting attack would leave the country a smoking ruin.
Third, North Korea's total war plan has two components: massive conventional warfare and weapons of mass destruction. If the US mounts a
preemptive strike on North Korea's Yongbyon nuclear plants, North Korea will retaliate with weapons of mass destruction: North Korea will mount
strategic nuclear attacks on the US targets
This really does read like some of NK's propaganda.
Tank battles in Korea will be fought on hilly terrains without any close air cover,
because North Korean fighters will engage US planes in
close dog fights.
They are very optomistic about their own abilities.
They aslo seem to think of war in terms of old stratagies, without the technologies and tactics used by america in Iraq, such as cluster bombs that
target tanks, predators etc.
Realy for success all america needs to do is cut of aid. There is already starvation and exonomic collapse in the country if the borders were closed
their whole infrastructure would collapse. Starving soldiers and a starving populace don't fight well at all.
A nice bit of propaganda.... typical of rense.
Sorry, I'm still not worried. With or without nukes? Are
you serious? Surely this article is not.... Its hard to hack when your communications are down before you even know what hit you....it's even
harder to hack when you're an ashen shadow on the wall....
