Originally posted by AfterInfinity
I would have more of a problem with that if I actually liked the real world.
Here's one slice of "real world" for you.
After having a good laugh at that joke in the "Return of Thoth" video, I started reading the comments on it, and while there were a few negative
ones, they were mostly bizarrely accepting that the fellow in the Guy Fawkes mask was really the physical manifestation of this ancient spirit. So I
set out to find out who he is...
There's a guy in the comments named "ElijahGreen" who appears to be said person, from his comments. Looked for "Elijah Green", found this:
http:///nCRuL4WW (it looks like ATS doesn't like pastebin, so you'll have to create the url yourself -- pastebin dot com slash
Okay, that's interesting, looks like the guy's real name is Nathaniel Gromalski. Let's go look for him:
Looky there, there he is! Scroll down a bit and you'll see that he's got a picture from 24 August that looks right out of the video, sans the mask.
And, sure enough, one of his friends is also familiar...
Sure enough, there's "Jordan David", our little chipmunk talking friend. He has a nice picture of "Thoth" on his profile, and in the comments,
says that it's Nathaniel Gromalski.
Now, back in that pastebin file, there was an odd notation:
Also, Nate's bio says:
Born 9/10/1985 Died 7/20/2009
I'm guessing this refers to him realizing that he's Thoth and waking up, if you will.
That does seem rather odd, no? I wondered what might have happened to old Nathaniel on 20 July, 2009. Back to "teh Interwebs", and what do we
Well, whadya know? He was arrested that night! Turns out, in fact, that he was arrested three times in 2008 and 2009, including for credit card
Now, I don't know if old "Thoth" turned his life around on that July night, I certainly hope that he did. But I'm not sure I'd be sending him my
credit card information for his "ancient secrets", lol
And, OP, I know you will make some snide remark about all of this, but it's your guru who is hanging out with criminals, lying about scientific
facts, and making fun of the people who follow him. You want to defend that behaviour, I will certainly agree that you need