It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Blue Shift
What kind of kudos does somebody like that deserve? "Nice try?"
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by ScientificUAPer
Yet another hostile-to-belief rant
without
addressing my points much at all.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
Perhaps one day you will realize the overwhelming part BELIEF plays in your life.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
.. doggedly persistent and thorough research.
There might be something worth modeling in that.
Originally posted by ScientificUAPer
Yea, he's the old school nuts and bolts kinda guy. I wish there was more of that stuff, many of the modern cases are just plain weird and incomprehensible in comparison to the classic 'flying saucer' stories.
Originally posted by nighthawk1954
Is Stanton Friedman the real deal or a fake??? What is your opinion??? Me I think he is real.
Published on Aug 14, 2012 by UFOTVstudios
Are Flying Saucers Real? Take a biographical look at Stanton T. Friedman, who for the past 40 years has been the world's foremost investigator and lecturer on the UFO phenomenon, also credited with breaking the famous Roswell UFO case. He has authored over 70 UFO articles, and is the author of two books "Crash at Carona" and "Top Secret MAJIC."
About a hour long, a good Vid.
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by The GUT
Originally posted by Blue Shift
What kind of kudos does somebody like that deserve? "Nice try?"
Or, "Thanks, but no thanks." Stanton can't, of course, be held responsible for not solving the ufo enigma, but we can hardly thank him for literally ignoring the high-strangeness aspects as you so well noted.
Plus, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that MJ-12 was a sham...oh wait...he is a rocket scientist. Never mind.
So, he's either way too gullible and close-minded to be competent, or maybe he really is compromised.
Originally posted by Jchristopher5
Originally posted by The GUT
Originally posted by Blue Shift
What kind of kudos does somebody like that deserve? "Nice try?"
Or, "Thanks, but no thanks." Stanton can't, of course, be held responsible for not solving the ufo enigma, but we can hardly thank him for literally ignoring the high-strangeness aspects as you so well noted.
Plus, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that MJ-12 was a sham...oh wait...he is a rocket scientist. Never mind.
So, he's either way too gullible and close-minded to be competent, or maybe he really is compromised.
It is so hard to separate truth from fiction around the UFO subject. William Cooper said Friedman and Lazar, among others, were CIA agents. Truth or raging, lunatic fringe from a disturbed human being? Or was Cooper telling the truth, and literally went crazy from knowing the truth?
It is really hard to say. I tend o think Friedman is not compromised, but it is hard to know for sure.
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by Jchristopher5
Originally posted by The GUT
Originally posted by Blue Shift
What kind of kudos does somebody like that deserve? "Nice try?"
Or, "Thanks, but no thanks." Stanton can't, of course, be held responsible for not solving the ufo enigma, but we can hardly thank him for literally ignoring the high-strangeness aspects as you so well noted.
Plus, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that MJ-12 was a sham...oh wait...he is a rocket scientist. Never mind.
So, he's either way too gullible and close-minded to be competent, or maybe he really is compromised.
It is so hard to separate truth from fiction around the UFO subject. William Cooper said Friedman and Lazar, among others, were CIA agents. Truth or raging, lunatic fringe from a disturbed human being? Or was Cooper telling the truth, and literally went crazy from knowing the truth?
It is really hard to say. I tend o think Friedman is not compromised, but it is hard to know for sure.
On the contrary, it is very easy to learn that Friedman is not only compromised but he is an outright liar, all for the buck$. Read "THE REAL ROSWELL CRASHED-SAUCER COVERUP" by Philip J. Klass and even if you have a disdain for Klass, read what he reveals about Friedman (and Schmitt, Berliner, Randle and others). It is not pleasant if you are a Friedman supporter and what Klass reveals can be verified and there are other sources which arrive at the same conclusion. Friedman is dishonest.
Originally posted by FireMoon
snip
Originally posted by FireMoon
Pointless really Shrike, cos if you actually read what I post in general, I'm firmly with GUT on the whole "Stanton, just skirts round the difficult stuff ". I also authored a post stating that, I suspect that Stanton's aversion to Bob Lazar is based partly on, Bob being everything Stanton isn't , personable, easy going and a bit of a natural genius. Ergo, he goes gunning for Bob wanting to believe he's a "fake".
I think Stanton's done some sterling work, do i agree with all his analysis ? No. Then again , given my own work, I also understand how people become addicted to being "famous" and cant become defensive and tetchy when anyone else seems to steal their limelight and often, they aren't even aware they are doing it.
Oh and realityuncovered?? really??? That site deals with facts with the same careless abandon Greer does. Self satisfied smug ignoramuses is one of the nice things I can think of to say about many of that particular site's contributors.edit on 3-11-2012 by FireMoon because: (no reason given)