posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 06:56 PM
Originally posted by GBP/JPY
did you guys know it only takes 800 years to petrify wood,
Link please.
Originally posted by GBP/JPY
and scouring by water takes only weeks to cut twenty feet of rock,
Link please.
Originally posted by GBP/JPY
and when Dallas love field was carbon dated on the ramp, it was found to be 15,000 years old. [sic]
Link please.
Note, I am not being sarcastic or condescending. I am merely requesting sources for how you came up with these numbers and to which circumstances
they apply. Assuming all those numbers are true (I doubt it) it seems to me that you are looking at a few extreme and rare cases, committing a Hasty
Generalization Fallacy, and then using that fallacious reasoning to justify your disregard for well established methods of science in order prop up
your own beliefs which have no evidence.
Either that, or you are trying to demonstrate that the hammer could have been petrified in a few hundred years, cut out of rock by a waterfall
essentially overnight, found by a hoaxster, and then carbon dated to an incorrect date. If so, what does an incorrect dating have to do with
debunking the hammer myth?
Instead of listing un-sourced tidbits, please provide positive evidence for your claim (including sources) and list your conclusion so that we know
your position.