Originally posted by radiant_obsidian
In June of 1934, members of the Hahn family discovered a rock, sitting loose on a
rock ledge[...]this weathered rock
had wood protruding from it, they cracked it open, exposing the hammer head.
This is not evidence of anything. Some family finds a hammer in a lump of mud and thinks its a rock? I recall that there was a spark plug found in a
lump of mud that everyone who didn't know what they were talking about thought was an ancient rock, but, surprise surprise, wasn't.
The unusual metallurgy is 96% iron, 2.6% chlorine and 0.74% sulfur (no carbon).
Density tests indicate casting exceptional quality.
According to who?
How is it that a hammer, made from a metal purer than any metal smelting techniques used in modern industry could be found in a peice of cretaceous
rock from 75-100million years old????
It hasn't, so the answer to the question is sort of meaningless.
My belief is that our race is much older than we know or can scientifically prove, this is not the first time that humans have dominated the
If it can't be demonstrated because of lack of evidence, and there is a conspiracy covering it up, how did you
come to this conclusion? How
did the conspiracy fail to trick you? Without any evidence, you are just making things up, and accepting them as real.
Think about this, if man was around over 500,000 years ago, why wouldnt we know about it?
Half a million years is a long time for a cataclysm or great flood, or even meteor shower to happen. read the bible
There is no evidence for a world wide flood. There are deposits of localized floods from longer ago than you are saying, so the evidence certainly
could survive. But there isn't
evidence of a world-wide one. So why pretend that there is?Whats to say our history doesnt go back even
further, its just we have yet to find evidence of this.
I personally think that evolution may play a key. we did not simply eveolve from monkeys and chimps to our current state overnight, what if there has
been more than 1 species of humanoid homonid like us???
Uhmmmm, in case you hadn't bothered to look at the research on this topic, there were
humanoid running around the planet besides us.
This is not only likely, but highly probable as nature would need species similar to humans, to be able to evolve into humans. And where have all
these other species gone? What happened to all the other species whilst we evolved and took over the planet?
Perhaps you should try looking at the evidence, which obviously you haven't, before
jumping, er, I mean making, conclusions. See, thats
how it usually works. You look at stuff first
you describe it.
The article link is below.
It didn't show up. Apparently that doesn't matter, because you aren't even saying its correct.
what makes u think our technology or advancements would be found by acrcheologists way off in the future?
Since there is evidence of technology (stone tools, settlements, burials, etc) from 'way off in the past', why think that they wouldn't find
anything? Even if every city was 'nuked', there'd still be piles of weird radioactive metals and radio-isotopes that only result from nuke
explosions all over the planet (and thats of course ignoring all the places that simply -wouldn't- get nuked)
Take a look at the amount of nukes we have around the world, easily enough to destroy the planet, or any evidence we were ever hear.
Absolutely not. Enough to complete wreak civilization probably, certainly the west anyway, but not to erase all evidence of civilization.
Whats to say some of our larger meteor strikes such as the chixiclub would not have this same effect in the past??
Well, since we have evidence from before the chixilhub, not to mention evidence of the impact and its affects itself....
Or the great flood as described in the bible and sumerian texts.
So there's no evidence of a great flood, therefore it had to have happened? Because of some story that doesn't make sense? There isn't even
enough water to flood the planet in the first place.
how do you explain the Mayans who had a knowledge of our own solar system and astronomy beyond our own untill the turn of this century, they
knew about planets we hadnt even found
No, they didn't.
yet they knew this without the aid of any real scientific instruments or telescopes?
One can see the stars and planets without instruments. 'Seven easier when there aren't any cities dumping light into the sky.
the egyptians, Messopotamians, Mayans, Incas, Aztecs and Native American Indian tribes had this same understanding of astrology and the
And we have evidence of their technologies and cultures. Buildings, papers, glyphs, temples, burials, settlements, farms, everything. You had said
that the technology of this ancient civ was too old to remain, yet everything else does. You think that they had metal smelting factories, ore
processors, industrial mines, labs, and universities to figure it all out, but these things are gone and some coloured mud on pressed reeds is still
Where did these ancient races come from or how did they derive their vast knowledge.
Well, I'd be willing to be that they didn't just make up stuff and uncritically accept things other people told them. But they weren't
advanced in terms of science and technology anyways, so where are you getting that from?
Also if the rocks appearance did differ from the surrounding rocks, then it would have been mentioned in the article.
Why would it say that? You know the journalistic standards of the author?
Oh my John Titor found his long lost hammer
Nice. Apparently he needed technology more primitive than that old IBM. Maybe the people in the future had gotten frustrated with it and need the
hammer to smash it.