Thats not really what this thread is about, but I got your attention now so I am going to run with it. Nor is this thread about the day 9/11 itself,
it is more less about the aftermath.
Ok so, disclaimer first. I am no fan of George Bush any more than I am Barack Obama. Though George did have that dry since of humor that from time to
time cracked me up and made me laugh out loud. Obama doesn't have that. Anyways....
I will try to keep this as simple as possible, because if one wants to know the truth about 9/11 they should pay close attention to the things that
happened afterwards as a result and though the crime scene itself is very important to any investigation, you must first determine a motive if you are
going to get any traction on any type of investigation.
So about the crime scene, it would have been simple enough for any private contractor to have been working prior to 9/11 in any parts of the building,
unaware that they were actually taking part in one of the biggest coverups and murders in history. It would be simple enough if someone wanted to
destroy the towers to open a business and have it leased out to part of the WTC. From there you could also hire workers to go in and do small jobs one
at a time, lets say for instance, we are going to try to reinforce the infrastructure by making small cuts in the metal frame or core so that later we
can go and reinforce it with our extra special reinforcements.
Instead of the whole government or a big part of it working together on an inside job, a person with money and a bit of power could have easily
infiltrated the complex, by say starting a business there and by hiring small contractors to do small jobs completely unaware that they were taking
part in a much bigger operation.
After all it was not the first time the WTC was attacked.
Ok so moving on, thats the basis of my thinking about this operation, however this is not really what this is about. People could go on and on with
that theory for months or even years as they have with many others.
What we have to establish here is a motive. Obviously it was a psychological wound and a lot of gold went missing. But lets take a look at what
The following link is a pdf from earlier in 2001 called phase III. Its a lengthy read but highlighted in boxes are certain actions by the president or
congress or whoever that requires a specific action. By the end of the document you will find them put side by side giving you the meat of the subject
that requires specific actions.
So yeah, there you have it, there were most likely people on the inside that knew exactly what was going on and the specific actions to take.
Now what I want to highlight in all of this is the creation of DHS and then the soon to be President of the United States and his marxist friends
Barack Obama. Immediately after the attack George Bush announced the creation of the Department of Homeland Security but as you can plainly tell the
creation of DHS was already in the works prior to 9/11 and if you asked me the entire department is unconstitutional in its creation, so the
constitution in that respect took a major blow.
Now I am not saying that George Bush had anything to do with it or not. To try to pin that upon him as an individual is a means of distraction to
blind us all from the truth. I will say though that Silverstein, owner of the buildings at the time was only there for a very short time before 9/11
and though that does not imply that he did or did not have any knowledge prior to the event. He may have been completely in the dark, maybe the owner
before him had the knowledge and sold or perhaps the insurance company itself.
Anyways, its all the stuff that happened afterwards that helps us find a motive. So while the left was screaming that George Bush did 9/11 it may very
well be that Aaron Russo was telling the truth and the motive was to turn the US into a communist style government and chip everybody.
What say you ATS?