It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
There is actually a period from the Apollo 15 landing footage where a rock that is seen from approx 200 feet up remains in view until the lunar module touches down and it doesn't change in size!
edit on 5-9-2012 by Wonderer2012 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Komodo
reply to post by wmd_2008
hummm..
yes.. I see..
ok.. but..
what about the original OP pics .. they LOOK the same reguardless of the distance ?? film is film..but distance will change .. unless camera have a magic trick .. which we all didn't know about ..
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
Surely the difference of 3,000ft above the moon's surface and on the actual surface should be easy to spot given it is the same camera and footage for each image?
so where do all these massive rocks and craters go- to me, the video footage lacks the 3D you would expect as the surface of the moon gets closer.
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
In reality, as you get closer to the surface, the image should come into focus.
This however, does not happen, it all remains flat looking which is indicative of a model- as it doesn't grasp the true dimensions.
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
- So from that height, the rocks/craters you can see would be very large given how big they look.
- As the lunar module descends, the rocks do not get bigger even though it is getting closer to the surface- surely these rocks should be coming into focus?
Surely if it was real someone could point out the difference of 3,000ft?