It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by superman2012
It would be helpful if all the pics were of the same region. Who's to say if there are smaller rocks/craters where they landed.
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
Originally posted by superman2012
It would be helpful if all the pics were of the same region. Who's to say if there are smaller rocks/craters where they landed.
Why would it matter?
If you are far away from a big rock, you still cannot see the same detail as you would being close to a small rock. Surely that is obvious?
Look at your hand, and see the incredible detail.
Look out your window at a building that is thousands of times bigger than your hand, you would not be able to see the same detail as being CLOSE to something.
We've got to use logic people.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
I do see a slight difference in the above pics but not enough detail to prove we went there - or not. I have always felt the moon landing video looked very off. I personally don't believe Man went to the moon. Or that is to say, I don't believe it can be proven that we did go. Everything they say they did or took from the Moon can be faked. All we have is our corrupt governments word - you people still want to believe anything that comes out of this governments month? Astounding.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
In your last pic.. the one from the surface.. how far from the ground is the camera? Do we know? Exactly? How high up is the camera on the lander?.. perhaps 10, feet? Less? More?
Think about that.
Now compare that image to the rocks you see in the foreground and background in the picture with the astronaut and the flag - does it seem plausible to you that these images are similar? They are Not even close to being similar.
This tells me the Op is on to something.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Wonderer2012
You cant judge distances that are taken by a film / video camera UNLESS you have information to go on.
You don't not know the size of the craters in the pictures so you have nothing to judge it by.
Same BS as your Apollo 12 thread then
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Anyone ever use Google Moon?
It's part of Google Earth. It's free. We could compare two of these images at different altitudes.
In the other thread, I suggested doing this with the fake moon set in the desert that NASA built for mockups, but the moon itself would be better.
I do see a slight difference in the above pics but not enough detail to prove we went there - or not. I have always felt the moon landing video looked very off. I personally don't believe Man went to the moon. Or that is to say, I don't believe it can be proven that we did go. Everything they say they did or took from the Moon can be faked. All we have is our corrupt governments word - you people still want to believe anything that comes out of this governments month? Astounding.
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Wonderer2012
You cant judge distances that are taken by a film / video camera UNLESS you have information to go on.
You don't not know the size of the craters in the pictures so you have nothing to judge it by.
Same BS as your Apollo 12 thread then
No, I think the 'detail' of the surface of the moon should appear different when close to the surface and when 3,000ft above
Not rocket science.
Why not just tell me which pictures show which distance and prove me wrong? Get it over with already!
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
I want to strengthen my point on this conspiracy. Mods, please do not delete this thread as my main point would be lost amongst the name calling of the other thread.
I have put together 4 images from Apollo 15's approach and landing.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Anyone ever use Google Moon?
Don't use that use this
LRO
This post will explain how to use it.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Pinke
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
I want to strengthen my point on this conspiracy. Mods, please do not delete this thread as my main point would be lost amongst the name calling of the other thread.
I have put together 4 images from Apollo 15's approach and landing.
Appreciate that you make a new thread for specific questions rather than make a thread which is generally 'moon landing is fake' which spirals out of control ... Not sure if we needed two for this.
However, Superman is right also.
Required questions:
- Video source
- Time codes of video
- Which camera is it? How is it different to the camera shot you have provided for comparison?
- What workflow is the signal going through. (www.hq.nasa.gov... this can help to a degree)
- Distances are correct this time?
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Anyone ever use Google Moon?
It's part of Google Earth. It's free. We could compare two of these images at different altitudes.
In the other thread, I suggested doing this with the fake moon set in the desert that NASA built for mockups, but the moon itself would be better.
I do see a slight difference in the above pics but not enough detail to prove we went there - or not. I have always felt the moon landing video looked very off. I personally don't believe Man went to the moon. Or that is to say, I don't believe it can be proven that we did go. Everything they say they did or took from the Moon can be faked. All we have is our corrupt governments word - you people still want to believe anything that comes out of this governments month? Astounding.
Don't use that use this
LRO
This post will explain how to use it.
www.abovetopsecret.com...