It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Democratic National Convention Discussion

page: 12
10
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 07:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Indigo5
I think you confused this with the RNC convention thread....


Must have took some brain power to come up with that eh?

Not really a suprise coming from a Democrat. ~$heopleNation




posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 07:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kaploink
They have always been jealous that the Kennedys threw better parties. Nobody wanted to go to Newt Gingrich's parties.


I could care less about Newt Gingrich. I am just calling these left-wing nutcases out like I see them. It really has nothing to do with the fake two party system set up for the $heople to swallow.


Who cares who "throws better parties" anyway? Jeezus, no wonder this Country is so screwed up.

Well, If the subject is really about who throws the better party, then that would depend on whether or not Ted Kennedy was driving you home afterwards, would it not? Just saying. ~$heopleNation



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 07:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Cynicaleye
 



edit on 5-9-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 07:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Cynicaleye
 


NDAA, assassinations of American citizens without a trial, abolition of Habeous Corpus, Obamacare(don't pay attention to the fact the Supreme Court made it legit by calling it a tax) for starters.
To be fair, he's not doing it all by himself. He has plenty of enablers and co-traitors.

OH yah and going to war without Congressional approval but instead following the dictates of the UN.

He also was about to completely destroy our national sovereignty with all those UN treaties, and Hillary too.


edit on 5-9-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-9-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 07:49 PM
link   
There is a nun speaking, I thought the DNC was supposedly anti-god?


edit on 5-9-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 07:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by RealSpoke
There is a nun speaking, I thought the DNC was supposedly anti-god?


edit on 5-9-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)
How did you leap to Anti-God..

Just because they wanted Religion to be a non-issue, doesnt mean anti-God.

If they dont discuss Criminal Justice, will you then say they are Pro Criminal.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 07:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by RealSpoke
There is a nun speaking, I thought the DNC was supposedly anti-god?


edit on 5-9-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)


They are until they figure out they need some votes. It is desperation. Don't forget the Christian socialism factor either. It is a fact that Marxism has inflitrated the churches.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 07:53 PM
link   
reply to post by RealSpoke
 


Both parties are anti god.... Look how much power both of them have aquired over the people in the past 20 years. Look what they do to people who dont comply with "THEIR" will.
Government now thinks it is God.

I dont think God would be too happy about that.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 07:55 PM
link   
reply to post by PatrickGarrow17
 



In 16 years before Obama, we had 8 each with a republican and democratic president. The Dem has a current rating of 66% favorable, the Rep is 43%. And yet, there is still a huge faction wanting to put a Republican administration back in. This seems inconsistent to me.


It's because the GOP creates angry white people, especially in this election....with help of their right wing media... And I got this from a Republican senator


Sen. Lindsey Graham Says Republicans ‘Not Generating Enough Angry White Guys’

“The demographics race we’re losing badly [sic],” the senior senator from South Carolina explained. “We’re not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term.”

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 07:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Tw0Sides
 


I don't think they're anti-God....I kinda was hoping that they could be. An agnostic party would be awesome. I was just parroting the anti-Dem propaganda to show that it isn't the case.

There is a nun getting a ton of applause.
edit on 5-9-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 08:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by Tw0Sides
 


I don't think they're anti-God....I kinda was hoping that they could be. An agnostic party would be awesome. I was just parroting the anti-Dem propaganda to show that it isn't the case.

There is a nun getting a ton of applause.
edit on 5-9-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)
No party could ever be Agnostic.

Those Evangelical Nutjobs in the South yield to much Power over their Flocks of Sheep to be ignored,



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 



They are until they figure out they need some votes


Nope. A lot of black democrats are highly religious. Most Catholics, Jews, and Muslims are democrats as well. You can't be anti-god when religious people make up your party. Democratic citizens are the party...




edit on 5-9-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 08:11 PM
link   
reply to post by PatrickGarrow17
 


The DNC needs a DNC procedure done on itself. Lies,Sex, and Video Tape in the DNC ! WOW, where's my barf bag? I'm so sick of the LIES and DECEPTIONS that this really should be a very magic moment in history.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 08:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Cynicaleye
 


NDAA


COUGH GOP

COUGH

HYPOCRITE



Instead, the House passed, by a vote of 243-173, an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) sponsored by Reps. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), Jeff Landry (R-La.) and Scott Rigell (R-Va.) that affirmed U.S. citizens would not be denied habeas corpus rights.

Smith and Amash had hoped to attract enough support from libertarian-leaning Republicans to pass their measure, but only 19 Republicans voted for it, while 19 Democrats voted against


www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 08:34 PM
link   
I wish the US auto industry didn't out all together

I would have loved to pay for all those people's welfare



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 08:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by Tw0Sides
 


I don't think they're anti-God....I kinda was hoping that they could be. An agnostic party would be awesome. I was just parroting the anti-Dem propaganda to show that it isn't the case.

There is a nun getting a ton of applause.
edit on 5-9-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)


She's an X Nun. How is it that a presidential candidate doesn't even know what his party is standing for, and he's supposed to be it's leader. Don't worry about them being anti God, they are. They just had to put the words back to keep some liberal Catholics who don't follow the teachings of their own church in the game.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 08:58 PM
link   
reply to post by PatrickGarrow17
 


The Left hates crony capitalism, that is except where they can benefit. Jarrett has connections to Solyndra lobbyists, according to Edward Klein in his book, "The Amateur". She has "close ties to the George Kaiser Foundation who has a 35.7 % share interest in Solyndra. (p 100, The Amateur)
edit on 5-9-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 09:00 PM
link   
reply to post by thepresident
 


I bet you blame Bush for the Patriot Act too. but never mind.its all the same stuff. COUGH COUGH

Also I have said that Obama has plenty of enablers around him. COUGH COUGH COUGH

Also let's not forget that Democrats helped to pass the Patriot Act and Obama continued it COUGH COUGH COUGH COUGH


But then I guess even a leftist doesn't have to agree with the ACLU

From Wikipedia: The Constitution does not authorize the President to use signing statements to circumvent any validly enacted Congressional Laws, nor does it authorize him to declare he will disobey such laws (or parts thereof). When a bill is presented to the President, the Constitution (Art. II) allows him only three choices: do nothing, sign the bill, or (if he disapproves of the bill) veto it in its entirety.
Obama’s use of signing statements has clearly shown his willingness to continue the George W. Bush legacy– not only of torture and illegal detainment, but in the dangerous trend of de facto rule by “executive fiat.” Worse, such signing statements put in place a precedent for future presidents to follow– or expand upon.


After the legislation cleared Congress, the ACLU commented that signing the bill “will damage both his legacy and American’s reputation for upholding the rule of law,” while executive director of the Human Rights Watch blasted the President for being ‘on the wrong side of history,’ noting that “Obama will go down in history as the president who enshrined indefinite detention without trial in US law.”

www.infowars.com...


edit on 5-9-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-9-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-9-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-9-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 09:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Fromabove
 


Shes still catholic...so, I don't get your point. If they were anti-god they wouldn't have a nun talking about religion at the convention.


Don't worry about them being anti God, they are.


I wish they were but that just isn't the case. Most democrats are religious, just not extremists like the GOP.


edit on 5-9-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 09:19 PM
link   
So the DNC gives an open call vote for including God AND Jerusalem as 'the' capital in ONE vote.....together.....NOT separate? Not one mention of this so far in the media. How could one not sEE the conspiracy in that? Is one to assume there is no God to be included if Jerusalem is not included as the capital of Israel?

Again, how could one Not see the conspiracy in that? It's very clear as to whom that vote is to benefit, Israel (Rothschild), not God, not the United States of America. Israel, Rothschild, Zionist's Satan is not God. Israel's politcal party, not necessarily it's collective citizenry, of which are 90% eastern european (khazars) descent brought over and financed by Rothschild after ww2 to establish 'his' nation state in the middle east, Not for the benefit of Jews, Palestinians (of whom for the most part got along fine before the state was established). The Khazars were chosen by Rothschild since they already had an established relationship with the Rothschild's banking/usery/fiat dole-ar business with the ultimate goal of establishing a One World Order with the creation of central banks as the means to that end.

Balfour was signed 'for' Truman as he was mysteriously sick and absent during that vote. He was later 'influenced' into accepting that vote which was signed fOr him for the benefit of Rothschild's goal of establishing a central bank in the middle eastern region just as he recently did in Libya, every other country in the world less Iran, Syria and few smaller holdouts.

"Give me control of a nations currency and I care not who makes it's laws". 'a' Rothschild. The Protocals of zion,sion have nothing to do with God for it is the Synagogue of Satan as the Mossad motto attests "By way of deception thou shall Do War". Divide and conquer certainly is Not a covenant/parable of the Creator. Why would a Creator wish to divide and conquer 'the Creation'? AIPAC, PNAC is not Of the Creator; rather a serious 'human' error in common sense/judgement.

Who's next? Syria? Iran? ????? Click 'here' for more of what you obviously were not told you could believe in for a Reason!

Why would the Creator want to destroy 'any' of the flock?
Any answers?
Debate?
Anyone?
?

edit on 5-9-2012 by Bluemoonsine because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-9-2012 by Bluemoonsine because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-9-2012 by Bluemoonsine because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-9-2012 by Bluemoonsine because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
10
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join