Originally posted by astrocreep
How about Bush? A ranch that he owns in a one-horse town in texas. Don't give me the old working man ideology or do you think Algore's Mom sung
the Union label song to him in his crib ( when he was 17)? I am the working man, buddy. I'll tell ya who is for the working man when I look at my
pay stub every month...and in my next post, I'm going to give you some info on who the rich truly support with hard numbers.
If you weren't making money during the Clinton years, blame yourself for lack of initiative, not Clinton. I am a business owner & have been since
1993. My revenue grew 1000% from 1993 to 2000. Am I anyone's definition of a 'Fat Cat'? Maybe. But, I pay mortgages, I never spent more than $500
on a suit, I pay taxes and I don't have my father's buddies setting me up in CEO slots at corporations. Not that UAW workers have that kinda of
pull, but they're good men none the less. Yeah, I do work harder: I have 10 other 'work' windows open to this one 'fun' window & my 7:30 starts
usually end on the other side of a 12 hour work day.
History, my friend, history. The Reagan/Bush era left the country in financial shambles. It was necessary to work our way out of the hole; to use your
analogy, Clinton was the farmer who had to set up a side job selling corn at a roadside stand in order to buy seed and make bigger profit overall. The
massive deficit accumulated under the previous 12 years eroded our solvency in world markets, it weakened the dollar and it curtailed foreign
investment in US enterprises. Tax cuts without spending reductions simply remove working capital that is slated for vital program. You and I don't
quit our jobs & then go on shopping sprees, do we? That's what Bush's plan does now. To pay for these cuts, it's reduced the amount of Federal
Spending to the States, causing bankruptcies of municipalities & cites like has never been witnessed in the modern era.
It's a matter of public record, but look at what the Dems were adding in the way of extra 'fat' - increased education spending, increased aid to
the states to fund first responders for domestic defense, increased aid to the long term unemployed suffering under the Bush recession. More of that
'fat' was the paying out of what Bush promised to begin with - that rhetoric now to gain approval/non-delivery of promises that is the standard of
his presidency.
"One horse town Texas Ranch" - huh? You do know that he is New England-old-money-blue blood whose grandfathers made their fortunes off of being the
henchmen for the Rockefellers & Duponts, don't you?
The working man - why is the White House backing legislation that would change the way overtime is calculated? You know, what the working man relies
on to make ends meet? The legislation will calculate over a two week period instead of per day & reduce or eradicate what most people count on.
The poor, you want to really talk about this one? The Bush recession and fiscal mismanagement has driven more families under the poverty line than
since the Depression. The largest segment of families not being able to afford medical insurance? Those with a household income over $60K.
The Clinton /Rubin team compared to Bush( insider trading/co. Pitt)/Pitt ( Ivan Boesky's personal lawyer & mouthpiece to the Andersen's & big 5) -
I'll debate the comparison of their track records any day.
As for 'cooked books' - read the non-Rupert Murdoch papers, will you please? Under your Boy Bush, the number of corporations filing a restatement of
earnings is up
22% over last year, breaking the all time record for a second year in the row!!!! For those who don't know what a company
restating their earnings mean: If a company says they are going to make 'X', it give the impression of prosperity/profit/and a good business plan,
all factors that give that company buying power/credit rating/added investors/increased working capital. Well now, the time to 'proof' it out comes
around and that company goes back & says "well, we actually made 'Y' ". But, they of course don't give back any gain garnered when pretending to
be an 'X' strength company. I wonder why
that record number of companies all think they can get away with it!?!
And yes, the Clinton SEC honcho's piece of legislation to stop just such a thing was smacked down by a GOP lead Congress.
Links : Bush on Workers & Taxes
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.wage-slave.org...