I find it hard to believe any civilization can surpass 100,000 years., page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 4-9-2012 @ 03:48 PM by RoScoLaz
reply to post by iKnowWhatISeen



i tend to agree. the faults of civilization seem to outweigh the advantages, increasing exponentially over time. perhaps history is just a feedback loop of risen and fallen human civilizations.


reply posted on 4-9-2012 @ 04:17 PM by Druscilla
reply to post by iKnowWhatISeen



100,000?
That's longer than written historical record.
10,000 is longer than written historical record.
10,000 (in most cases) is longer than "civilization" itself has existed.


reply posted on 4-9-2012 @ 04:26 PM by iKnowWhatISeen
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to
post by iKnowWhatISeen



100,000?
That's longer than written historical record.
10,000 is longer than written historical record.
10,000 (in most cases) is longer than "civilization" itself has existed.



That's why I made the edit, I was just giving a timeframe to work with. The focus of this topic is civilization is an inevitable downfall. Please stick with that.


reply posted on 4-9-2012 @ 09:02 PM by Druid42
reply to post by iKnowWhatISeen





What do you think?


Where are your sources for this information, or are you just speculating? If speculating, at least provide a paragraph or so of ideas to read through. Minimal posts are boring to read.

Your title led me to believe you had proof of a civilization older than 100,000 years.

Where exactly, do you denote that civilization began? Early Indus valley? The Nile Delta? Africa?

Are you asking about the civilizations that ended due to global catastrophe?

Need. More. Info.


reply posted on 4-9-2012 @ 11:27 PM by Kushaholic
reply to post by iKnowWhatISeen



There have been many discoveries of artifacts dating back past 100 000 years those people ARE OUR ancestors which means that we can and have lasted over 100 000 years. You dont even state any older civilizations you know why because there are no older ones there is just us.

We are always advancing or changing how we live. That is the only fact in this thread. there is no past civilizations because we are still in this world civilization on earth were all connected


reply posted on 5-9-2012 @ 02:46 AM by Xcathdra
reply to post by iKnowWhatISeen



While I understand your point I think we are missing a larger point.

While its not likely any single civilization can last that long I do believe as a complete civilization we have already passed that mark and I dont see us stopping anytime soon.

What I mean in terms of single civilization is not American or European or African or Chinese etc etc etc but as humanity as a whole. Eventually we will leave this planet and explore the universe - as a single untied species.

Until we reach that point we can view the individual civilizations that have come and gone over the years on this planet as nothing more than practice when dealing with not only ourselves but other civilizations we will meet. We can also view each and take the best while avoiding the worst each had / has to offer.
edit on 5-9-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-9-2012 @ 02:48 AM by coredrill
The oldest continuous civilization is the Chinese Civilization.
its been around for 5000 years.
But cultures dating back beyond that have existed in china, but have been transformed into the Chinese civilization.
There is a difference between Civilization and Culture.



According to anthropologists of 19th century, Culture is earlier and Civilization is later. Everything created by man is culture, civilization is an advanced state of cultural development.
Source

Chinese "Civilization" is 5000 years old.
Pre-neolithic cultures have existed in China for close to 9011 years (give or take)


The Bushmen culture of South Africa/ Kalahari are said to exist since 100,000 years.
Or more precisely, tools looking identical to the ones used the modern day Bushmen have been found at Border Cave in KwaZulu-Natal in 2012 dating to 44,000 years BP.
That would beat it all.



reply posted on 5-9-2012 @ 06:14 AM by iKnowWhatISeen
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to
post by iKnowWhatISeen



While I understand your point I think we are missing a larger point.

While its not likely any single civilization can last that long I do believe as a complete civilization we have already passed that mark and I dont see us stopping anytime soon.

What I mean in terms of single civilization is not American or European or African or Chinese etc etc etc but as humanity as a whole. Eventually we will leave this planet and explore the universe - as a single untied species.

Until we reach that point we can view the individual civilizations that have come and gone over the years on this planet as nothing more than practice when dealing with not only ourselves but other civilizations we will meet. We can also view each and take the best while avoiding the worst each had / has to offer.
edit on 5-9-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)


Thankyou, I was talking about an indivual civilization.


reply posted on 5-9-2012 @ 12:05 PM by Harte
Originally posted by Kushaholic
reply to
post by iKnowWhatISeen



There have been many discoveries of artifacts dating back past 100 000 years those people ARE OUR ancestors which means that we can and have lasted over 100 000 years. You dont even state any older civilizations you know why because there are no older ones there is just us.

You are misusing the term "civilization" here.

What you're talking about here isn't even a culture. You're talking about species here, something entirely different from civilization or culture.

There are many definitions for "civilization." Wiki provides one that is good enough for the purposes of this thread:

Civilization (or civilisation) is a sometimes controversial term that has been used in several related ways. Primarily, the term has been used to refer to the material and instrumental side of human cultures that are complex in terms of technology, science, and division of labor. Such civilizations are generally hierarchical and urbanized. In a classical context, people were called "civilized" to set them apart from barbarians, while in a modern-day context, "civilized peoples" have been contrasted with primitive peoples.

There is a tendency to use the term in a less strict way, to mean approximately the same thing as "culture" and therefore, the term can more broadly refer to any important and clearly defined human society.[1] Still, even when used in this second sense, the word is often restricted to apply only to societies that have attained a particular level of advancement — especially the founding of cities.

Source

You can read more there for the differing views on the details.

People first have to agree on what the term actually means before anything like a logical discussion can ensue on the subject.

Harte
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



More Mysterious Nazca Lines From Space
  Posted 6 days ago with 124 member flags
The Aztec and Norse god of war are both missing one hand.
  Posted 17 days ago with 48 member flags
63,000-Year-Old Modern Human Skull Found in Laos
  Posted 18 days ago with 38 member flags
Multiple Human Species Were Likely The Norm
  Posted 11 days ago with 37 member flags
The Sumerian \'Flood-Storm\' weapon.
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags