New Scientific Report Destroys Global Warming!

page: 10
33
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 09:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi
Can someone post a link to the scientific peer studied research and documents that state man has not had an impact on global warming?


Why? Humans exhale CO2. No one is arguing that. What would be more interesting and enlightening is the Natural CO2 vs Manmade CO2 ratio for some given period of time. That would be interesting. No one can seem to find that.. in all the studies, articles, blogs, etc.


You're actually serious


LOL!

that just shows how far you've researched!!

hahahahaha!!!




posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 09:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by rwfresh
 


What would you consider more important, wars that affect groups of people around the globe or a disaster that kills most of the people on the globe?


What would you consider more important, putting a tourniquet on your chopped off arm stub or taking some anti-aging vitamins?

Sorry, are we assuming now that science can predict when most of the people on the globe will be killed by global warming? But are completely unable to predict when most of the people on the globe will be killed by radioactive waste, war and greed?



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 09:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by moniesisfun

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi
Can someone post a link to the scientific peer studied research and documents that state man has not had an impact on global warming?


Why? Humans exhale CO2. No one is arguing that. What would be more interesting and enlightening is the Natural CO2 vs Manmade CO2 ratio for some given period of time. That would be interesting. No one can seem to find that.. in all the studies, articles, blogs, etc.


You're actually serious


LOL!

that just shows how far you've researched!!

hahahahaha!!!


Yup. Totally serious. hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 09:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi
Can someone post a link to the scientific peer studied research and documents that state man has not had an impact on global warming?


Why? Humans exhale CO2. No one is arguing that. What would be more interesting and enlightening is the Natural CO2 vs Manmade CO2 ratio for some given period of time. That would be interesting. No one can seem to find that.. in all the studies, articles, blogs, etc.


So what you are saying is you have no proof?



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:01 PM
link   
reply to post by rwfresh
 


I'll throw you but one bone.

Look at the carbon pre-industrial revolution...say, 200 years back...under 280ppm for ...a long time...

where are we now?

can you honestly not connect that stupid easy dot?



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by rwfresh
 


What would you consider more important, wars that affect groups of people around the globe or a disaster that kills most of the people on the globe?



Sorry, are we assuming now that science can predict when most of the people on the globe will be killed by global warming?


Actually yes their are documents that state that once global temperatures rise to a certain level human life will not be sustainable.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by moniesisfun
reply to post by rwfresh
 


I'll throw you but one bone.

Look at the carbon pre-industrial revolution...say, 200 years back...under 280ppm for ...a long time...

where are we now?

can you honestly not connect that stupid easy dot?



Do you understand what i am asking for? Going by your statement i have to conclude you don't get it.

You know what a ratio is right?

Natural:Manmade

Give me the ratio for say the last 10 years. 1 day.. 100 Years. Your pick.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Grimpachi

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi
Can someone post a link to the scientific peer studied research and documents that state man has not had an impact on global warming?


Why? Humans exhale CO2. No one is arguing that. What would be more interesting and enlightening is the Natural CO2 vs Manmade CO2 ratio for some given period of time. That would be interesting. No one can seem to find that.. in all the studies, articles, blogs, etc.


So what you are saying is you have no proof?


Proof of what? I'm not saying anything about proof of anything because that seems to confuse those that hate thinking. I am asking what the ratio of Natural CO2 to manmade CO2 is. For any time period. Honest question.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:07 PM
link   
reply to post by rwfresh
 


tsk tsk!

not saying I'm throwing you another.

do tha research, bro!

current

so within 200 years we've gone up ~45%

can you find that ratio?



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Grimpachi

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by rwfresh
 


What would you consider more important, wars that affect groups of people around the globe or a disaster that kills most of the people on the globe?



Sorry, are we assuming now that science can predict when most of the people on the globe will be killed by global warming?



Actually yes their are documents that state that once global temperatures rise to a certain level human life will not be sustainable.


What temperature would that be? How fast is the temperature rising and how much of an impact on the temperature would eliminating all human produced CO2 have? Would be good to know.

In the meantime what are we doing to prevent an earthquake from causing nuclear meltdown of 10 of the 104 nuclear reactors in the USA which would kill off mankind? What have we done to prevent a solar flare from initiating nuclear meltdown on all 104 reactors?

What is being done to stop the use of depleted uranium? How much time do we have until the food chain is completely wiped out by unsustainable farming practices?

Go and try and get me concerned about the temperature possibly rising in the future. try. please. And while you are at it.. what is your solution again?



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by moniesisfun
reply to post by rwfresh
 


tsk tsk!

not saying I'm throwing you another.

do tha research, bro!

current

so within 200 years we've gone up ~45%

can you find that ratio?


Can you? Still looking.. good. Let me know when you find it because you haven't yet.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi
Can someone post a link to the scientific peer studied research and documents that state man has not had an impact on global warming?


Why? Humans exhale CO2. No one is arguing that. What would be more interesting and enlightening is the Natural CO2 vs Manmade CO2 ratio for some given period of time. That would be interesting. No one can seem to find that.. in all the studies, articles, blogs, etc.


So what you are saying is you have no proof?


Proof of what? I'm not saying anything about proof of anything because that seems to confuse those that hate thinking. I am asking what the ratio of Natural CO2 to manmade CO2 is. For any time period. Honest question.


Why are answereing my question with a question that does not pertain to mine? I guess that is why this thread is in the dissinfo and deflection area.

Nice deflection but my original question stands.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by moniesisfun
reply to post by rwfresh
 


tsk tsk!

not saying I'm throwing you another.

do tha research, bro!

current

so within 200 years we've gone up ~45%

can you find that ratio?


Friend. you understand that the majority of the CO2 produced on the planet does not come from humans right? You do understand that right? Not trying to be an ass. But seriously.. just wondering if that is the root of your confusion with regards to what i am asking.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Grimpachi

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi
Can someone post a link to the scientific peer studied research and documents that state man has not had an impact on global warming?


Why? Humans exhale CO2. No one is arguing that. What would be more interesting and enlightening is the Natural CO2 vs Manmade CO2 ratio for some given period of time. That would be interesting. No one can seem to find that.. in all the studies, articles, blogs, etc.


So what you are saying is you have no proof?


Proof of what? I'm not saying anything about proof of anything because that seems to confuse those that hate thinking. I am asking what the ratio of Natural CO2 to manmade CO2 is. For any time period. Honest question.


Why are answereing my question with a question that does not pertain to mine? I guess that is why this thread is in the dissinfo and deflection area.

Nice deflection but my original question stands.


I'm not here arguing that CO2 levels have increased. I never was. But you assuming i have been claiming that is indicative of the blinders most people have on. The question i am posing has been on the table long before you asked about something no one was arguing about.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:23 PM
link   
reply to post by rwfresh
 

As I have said before...regardless of how or what is causing Global Warming...it is happening. The U.S. Military is preparing for it. THAT alone tells you something. The U.S. Navy is retiring the Carrier Enterprise in 2015 with the new USS. CVN-78 Gerald R. Ford. This will be the first new class of Carriers since the Nimitz Class.

In 2020 the USS. Nimitz will be replaced by the FORD CLASS USS. CVN-79 J.F.K. Except now because of the speed of Global Warming there is not projected to be any Northern Polar Sea Ice Cap left so the Nimitz may be refitted and used as an Arctic Ocean Carrier Group to protect these new sea lanes.

GLOBAL WARMING IS A REALITY. Split Infinity



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by rwfresh
 


What would you consider more important, wars that affect groups of people around the globe or a disaster that kills most of the people on the globe?



Sorry, are we assuming now that science can predict when most of the people on the globe will be killed by global warming?



Actually yes their are documents that state that once global temperatures rise to a certain level human life will not be sustainable.


What temperature would that be? How fast is the temperature rising and how much of an impact on the temperature would eliminating all human produced CO2 have? Would be good to know.

In the meantime what are we doing to prevent an earthquake from causing nuclear meltdown of 10 of the 104 nuclear reactors in the USA which would kill off mankind? What have we done to prevent a solar flare from initiating nuclear meltdown on all 104 reactors?

What is being done to stop the use of depleted uranium? How much time do we have until the food chain is completely wiped out by unsustainable farming practices?

Go and try and get me concerned about the temperature possibly rising in the future. try. please. And while you are at it.. what is your solution again?



Who cares?

Depleted uranium? Are you a whack job? Sorry I used to work with it and you can’t change my mind on it.

Nuclear reactors? You are more worried about that than a worldwide extinction. Wow your priorities are way off.

Anyway here is a link I am still waiting for yours.Arctic News
Google is your friend
edit on 5-9-2012 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by rwfresh
 

As I have said before...regardless of how or what is causing Global Warming...it is happening. The U.S. Military is preparing for it. THAT alone tells you something. The U.S. Navy is retiring the Carrier Enterprise in 2015 with the new USS. CVN-78 Gerald R. Ford. This will be the first new class of Carriers since the Nimitz Class.

In 2020 the USS. Nimitz will be replaced by the FORD CLASS USS. CVN-79 J.F.K. Except now because of the speed of Global Warming there is not projected to be any Northern Polar Sea Ice Cap left so the Nimitz may be refitted and used as an Arctic Ocean Carrier Group to protect these new sea lanes.

GLOBAL WARMING IS A REALITY. Split Infinity




Yup and I am buying a sailboat soon.
Most of us know its coming I just wonder when.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by rwfresh
 

As I have said before...regardless of how or what is causing Global Warming...it is happening. The U.S. Military is preparing for it. THAT alone tells you something. The U.S. Navy is retiring the Carrier Enterprise in 2015 with the new USS. CVN-78 Gerald R. Ford. This will be the first new class of Carriers since the Nimitz Class.

In 2020 the USS. Nimitz will be replaced by the FORD CLASS USS. CVN-79 J.F.K. Except now because of the speed of Global Warming there is not projected to be any Northern Polar Sea Ice Cap left so the Nimitz may be refitted and used as an Arctic Ocean Carrier Group to protect these new sea lanes.

GLOBAL WARMING IS A REALITY. Split Infinity




Climate change is a reality but we've known that since the beginning of time when we observed the seasons.

SOOOOOOOOO WHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!

WHO CARES? BIG DEAL? Are you really threatened by this? I'm not. Not in the least. Human behavior has a MUCH larger impact on HUMAN LIFE and our future than it does on the TEMPERATURE. People are so blinded by the reality of this it is insanity. Dumping gallons of toxic waste into our oceans RIGHT NOW is fine.. But let's all worry about the temperature.

You don't need carbon data to tell you the temperature is increasing. You need temperature data. The delusion is that man's contribution of CO2 is causing it. That is the most idiotic, moronic conclusion ever pumped into the deluded masses psyche. People that jerk off to porn and eat McDonald's all day long are now concerned about the temperature rising? Time to take a look at society and the absolute disgusting culture of death we all participate in. But i am supposed to care so much that i should pay some devil dollars to some sick twisted perverts because they are going to save me? Come on! You should ask yourself why this is some kind of concern of yours. It is so demented. We will likely not be around long enough to see the global temperature rise 5 degrees at this rate. We will kill ourselves with war and poison long before that.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Grimpachi

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi

Originally posted by rwfresh

Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by rwfresh
 


What would you consider more important, wars that affect groups of people around the globe or a disaster that kills most of the people on the globe?



Sorry, are we assuming now that science can predict when most of the people on the globe will be killed by global warming?



Actually yes their are documents that state that once global temperatures rise to a certain level human life will not be sustainable.


What temperature would that be? How fast is the temperature rising and how much of an impact on the temperature would eliminating all human produced CO2 have? Would be good to know.

In the meantime what are we doing to prevent an earthquake from causing nuclear meltdown of 10 of the 104 nuclear reactors in the USA which would kill off mankind? What have we done to prevent a solar flare from initiating nuclear meltdown on all 104 reactors?

What is being done to stop the use of depleted uranium? How much time do we have until the food chain is completely wiped out by unsustainable farming practices?

Go and try and get me concerned about the temperature possibly rising in the future. try. please. And while you are at it.. what is your solution again?



Who cares?

Depleted uranium? Are you a whack job? Sorry I used to work with it and you can’t change my mind on it.

Nuclear reactors? You are more worried about that than a worldwide extinction. Wow your priorities are way off.

Anyway here is a link I am still waiting for yours.Arctic News
Google is your friend
edit on 5-9-2012 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)


You are seriously deluded. You are an automaton. Sorry. The DU explains a lot. Honestly you've got a lot more to worry about than the temperature and the Carbon Armageddon.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:41 PM
link   
reply to post by rwfresh
 

There are some VERY REAL ISSUES that Global Warming is creating. In the Pacific...there are Multiple Island Nations that will be underwater within this decade and they are relocating NOW! Cities on the coast of the U.S. as well as many other Countries are in danger of being Flooded with Ocean Water. Boston right now is building an Ocean Dam as the water level is just a few inches away from flowing over several Docks where buildings are built right on the water.

The Biggest Problem is if the Temps get high enough...this will melt so much fresh Water into the Oceans it will halt Ocean Currents such as the Gulf Stream and we will go into an ICE AGE.

This has happened before...but it will happen quickly if something is not done very soon. Split Infinity





top topics
 
33
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join