It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by eLPresidente
Maybe I have this wrong but I thought he would have had to announce his 3rd party candidacy a while ago.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
This is just getting sad. I had respect for rp, even though I disagree with a lot of his stances. But now he's just pandering. Reminds me of all of gore's challenges when he lost. There comes a point where you have to say "its over. We tried, I'm proud of the effort and accomplishments, but its over. "
Originally posted by MysticPearl
While Ron might not be great with computers and not understand the amount of support he has, he damn well should have someone working for him who is good with computers and can make it clear to him how much support he does have.
It would be inexcusable to not have someone on your staff responsible for tracking online support and relaying that message directly to him.
I love Ron Paul as much as anyone, but parts of his campaign have had less than desired affects and to not be aware of your online support at this stage in the game is embarrassing.
Plus, won't he have problems getting on ballots in a number of states as a third party candidate?
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by eLPresidente
Given your response in this thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I would have to say that I suspect you are not a real Ron Paul supporter and just trying to take GOP votes so that Obama has a chance in this election. Beware my friends.
The League of Women Voters is withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates...because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter. It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public.
Originally posted by Domo1
Its too late for him to run 3rd party.
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
I caucused for Paul. My son was a delegate for Paul. If Paul runs 3rd Party, I won't vote for him. I've voted LP or 3rd party in all but 1 election (Clinton '96). I am voting Romney, period. If Paul runs, he'll lose any respect I had for him.
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
I caucused for Paul. My son was a delegate for Paul. If Paul runs 3rd Party, I won't vote for him. I've voted LP or 3rd party in all but 1 election (Clinton '96). I am voting Romney, period. If Paul runs, he'll lose any respect I had for him.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
Originally posted by Domo1
Its too late for him to run 3rd party.
its not about winning a third party run as much as it is about getting into the national debate and opening the eyes of millions of americans to the two party scam.
are we, ATS members really just going to sit here like morons and let two turds argue each other about 'who built what'?
or are we going to talk about real issues like the fed, imperialism, and civil liberties?
Ron Paul polls nationally 18-21% between Robamney, thats enough to get him into the national debates with the threshold being 15%, thats unless they change the rules and move the threshold like the RNC did with nominations.