It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by bacci0909
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
This is just getting sad. I had respect for rp, even though I disagree with a lot of his stances. But now he's just pandering. Reminds me of all of gore's challenges when he lost. There comes a point where you have to say "its over. We tried, I'm proud of the effort and accomplishments, but its over. "
Haha.. you're comparing Ron Paul to Al Gore?
The fact of the matter is simple... the longer Ron Paul remains relevant, the better it is for us, the people. Do you disagree?
but I believe much of what he intends to do would hasten the demise of this country 10 fold.
Originally posted by Semicollegiate
Dr. Paul in the race could make either candidate make promises that would change the course of the future.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
If Ron Paul ran third party, he would pave the way for future third party runs giving the two party system less and less power until maybe one day, they dwindle away if we fight hard enough. If he doesn't run, things would be the same.
Originally posted by bacci0909
Originally posted by Semicollegiate
Dr. Paul in the race could make either candidate make promises that would change the course of the future.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
If Ron Paul ran third party, he would pave the way for future third party runs giving the two party system less and less power until maybe one day, they dwindle away if we fight hard enough. If he doesn't run, things would be the same.
Two great points that can't be stated enough. Ron Paul presents a win win win win
Ultimate win: He wins
win: His presence and massive following challenges the 2-party system and shames the irrelevant mainstream media
win: The content of his message puts pressure on the other candidates to adapt policies they wouldn't have otherwise adapted
win: The content of his message forces the other candidates to make even more promises in an effort to outshine him, and when they inevitably break those promises, their fraudulence becomes even more obvious to the average American, possibly bringing revolution on even sooner
A 3rd party run would be nothing but healthy for this nation and empowering for the people
I forget, where did I say I support either of them?
Originally posted by eLPresidente
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by bacci0909
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
This is just getting sad. I had respect for rp, even though I disagree with a lot of his stances. But now he's just pandering. Reminds me of all of gore's challenges when he lost. There comes a point where you have to say "its over. We tried, I'm proud of the effort and accomplishments, but its over. "
Haha.. you're comparing Ron Paul to Al Gore?
The fact of the matter is simple... the longer Ron Paul remains relevant, the better it is for us, the people. Do you disagree?
but I believe much of what he intends to do would hasten the demise of this country 10 fold.
If you actually believe that and support either Obama or Romney, I'm going to laugh at you because you're leaving
me no choice.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
I forget, where did I say I support either of them?
Originally posted by eLPresidente
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by bacci0909
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
This is just getting sad. I had respect for rp, even though I disagree with a lot of his stances. But now he's just pandering. Reminds me of all of gore's challenges when he lost. There comes a point where you have to say "its over. We tried, I'm proud of the effort and accomplishments, but its over. "
Haha.. you're comparing Ron Paul to Al Gore?
The fact of the matter is simple... the longer Ron Paul remains relevant, the better it is for us, the people. Do you disagree?
but I believe much of what he intends to do would hasten the demise of this country 10 fold.
If you actually believe that and support either Obama or Romney, I'm going to laugh at you because you're leaving
me no choice.
Originally posted by bacci0909
Originally posted by Semicollegiate
Dr. Paul in the race could make either candidate make promises that would change the course of the future.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
If Ron Paul ran third party, he would pave the way for future third party runs giving the two party system less and less power until maybe one day, they dwindle away if we fight hard enough. If he doesn't run, things would be the same.
That is very important right now because what is happening is unprecedented takeover of the whole political process with or without the consent of the voting population. We have witnessed first hand treachery on a grand scale and noone is championing the peoples voice least not the media who we fight and vote for their right to free speech if they so chose.
A 3rd party run would be nothing but healthy for this nation and empowering for the people
And we need a dose of healthy challenge in this election not just political undermining of our individual choice.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
I forget, where did I say I support either of them?
Originally posted by eLPresidente
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by bacci0909
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
This is just getting sad. I had respect for rp, even though I disagree with a lot of his stances. But now he's just pandering. Reminds me of all of gore's challenges when he lost. There comes a point where you have to say "its over. We tried, I'm proud of the effort and accomplishments, but its over. "
Haha.. you're comparing Ron Paul to Al Gore?
The fact of the matter is simple... the longer Ron Paul remains relevant, the better it is for us, the people. Do you disagree?
but I believe much of what he intends to do would hasten the demise of this country 10 fold.
If you actually believe that and support either Obama or Romney, I'm going to laugh at you because you're leaving
me no choice.
It'll be nice if someday paulites such as yourself can hold a conversation with people who don't agree with you without resorting to insult and ridicule. For being so against the status quo, you all sure do play the exact same games as the status quo.edit on 3-9-2012 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
reply to post by eLPresidente
So you're really wanting to derail your own thread and make it into another "rp is the greatest" thread? No thanks. You can look back through my posting history if you want to see my stance on rp (and by the way, my stance is based on FACTS)
Its always the same game with you "if you don't like rp you're closed minded, and don't know the facts". Same games the obama and romney supporters play. But you're "so against the status quo". Right.
And for the record, I said I BELIEVE his policies would hasten the demise of this country. That you feel the need to change it into a definite shows exactly what you are playing at.edit on 3-9-2012 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bacci0909
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
reply to post by eLPresidente
So you're really wanting to derail your own thread and make it into another "rp is the greatest" thread? No thanks. You can look back through my posting history if you want to see my stance on rp (and by the way, my stance is based on FACTS)
Its always the same game with you "if you don't like rp you're closed minded, and don't know the facts". Same games the obama and romney supporters play. But you're "so against the status quo". Right.
And for the record, I said I BELIEVE his policies would hasten the demise of this country. That you feel the need to change it into a definite shows exactly what you are playing at.edit on 3-9-2012 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
It seems you're the one trying to derail this thread into a question about his policies. I'm extremely open minded about what consequences a Ron Paul presidency would have. But it's about so much more than that at this point.
You need to settle down though, for real.
Look.. lets take it back to the original question I had asked you earlier.. only this time I'll add an assumed disclaimer..
Assuming that you're of the ilk that's convinced 'there's no way Ron Paul could ever win' :
Do you honestly think that him simply running 3rd party wouldn't be a positive thing for this country?
again, feel free to look back through my posting history, I've had this discussion ad nauseum, and it is pointless, as you will stick your fingers in your ears and say "nuh uh".
Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I see I struck a nerve.
"RP's policies would hasten the demise of this country 10 fold." Go ahead, use your facts that you have readily available.
Let's see just how fast the Constitution and free market economics would erode this country 10 times faster than it already eroding.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by bacci0909
Assuming that you're of the ilk that's convinced 'there's no way Ron Paul could ever win' :
Do you honestly think that him simply running 3rd party wouldn't be a positive thing for this country?
Ummm, where did I derail? You asked me about him, I gave my honest answer and left it at that. Everything that is following is not my doing.
Calm down? Get off it kiddo.
I think it would be as much of a positive as it was when nader ran 3rd party. Had rp run 3rd party from the start, id feel different. At this point in.the game, he'll be nothing but an afterthought. I said from the start he should havve run 3rd party.
And for the record, I wasn't a "rp can't win" believer, until he lost the gop nomination. Now I believe it is over. Again, I think he should have run third party from the start. He chose not to, and he lostedit on 4-9-2012 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)edit on 4-9-2012 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
I think it would be as much of a positive as it was when nader ran 3rd party. Had rp run 3rd party from the start, id feel different. At this point in.the game, he'll be nothing but an afterthought. I said from the start he should havve run 3rd party.
nope, no status quo politicing here. None at all. Carry on.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by captaintyinknots
oh...so the claimant no longer has to back up his claim but it is up to the one that questions to back up the claimants' claims?
ok, backwards guy.