Chuck Norris' Dire Warning For America, page 1

Chuck Norris Fact No. 39: “Chuck Norris stared evil in the eye and it went into hiding.”

America’s favorite action star is doing just that this election – calling on evangelical Christians across the nation to join him in crushing the creep of socialism under President Obama.

www.wnd.com...

Gena Norris-

“With our country at a crossroads, Chuck and I have asked ourselves what we can be doing to help support this great country we’re blessed to live in and how we can encourage our like-minded American brothers and sisters to unite and let their voices be heard,” she said. “It is estimated that in the 2008 election, 30 million evangelical Christians stayed home on voting day and Obama won the election by 10 million votes.”

That's an interesting stat (& statement) from Mrs. Norris, if verified that is huge. Hopefully Evangelicals won't be scared off by the Mormon aspect of this election.

reply to post by DaTroof

---

Oh look, a fake badass is telling us what to think! Everyone pay attention!

Chuck Norris, Clint Eastwood... The GOP is really playing on the insecurities of wimpy men, aren't they?

WIMPY?? You don’t want to be on Chuck’s bad side!



If he’s right, and if those 30 million show up this election, Obama is in deep trouble. Then again, I think he knows that because he’s already looking for a new home.

reply to post by seabag

---

Yes, a fake badass.



What a coincidence!!!! 10 million WOW players? That's enough voters to unseat Obama! Quick Chuck, sell your name on more products!

reply to post by lordtyp0

---

It appears you have overlooked the message while focusing on the messenger....

reply to post by lordtyp0

---

When the Neo-Cons were born the Republican party became a party of lies. They now openly say that they don't care about facts-they care about what polls well. The fact that the party of lies relies on fake people to call on people who believe in myths in order to keep people from being happy is horrific.

The party of LIES??? This thread never mentioned democrats!

Let’s take a look at the Liar-in-Chief:

*Open and transparent government? NOPE!

*No pork barrel spending? NOPE!

*5 days to read every bill before he signs it? NOPE!

*Meetings with lobbyists will be online and on Cspan for all to see? NOPE!

*Lobbyists will not work in my administration? NOPE!

*We will develop a full budget to eliminate waste? NOPE!

*We will cut the deficit in half in my first term? NOPE!

*I will close GITMO? NOPE!

*If you make less than $250,000 your taxes will not go up? NOPE!

*If you like your doctor, under Obamacare you can keep him? NOPE!

*I don’t want to run auto companies or banks? NOPE!

*Shovel ready? NOPE!



Would you like me to keep going???

reply to post by Signals

---

Not at all. The premise is that the US is "going to hell" and only Evangelicals can save it. Fact is, the turn out for evangelicals has traditionally be radically higher than Democratic support. This is why they tend to get their way though they lack popular support. The left is just lazy.

The problem is: Propaganda to remain in power. The Cons married the religious right and since then has done their damndest to chip away at education and any/all support programs for the non-affluent. They like to claim there is unfair tax burdens on the wealthy where as fact is-today's taxes are 1/3rd what they were until Reagan.

The nation is on its way to collapse because of religious rhetoric taking the place in public spotlights. Scientific endeavors have taken a back seat to wars where "God is on our side". Where if anyone speaks out in dissent they are somehow attacking their constitutional rights which, according to them, trumps the rights of everyone else. Afterall-they are divine mandate.


I am tired of being called a socialist and a communist and all sorts of things simply because people are too ignorant to bother researching for themselves-and simply parrot the same crap they hear.

Now, we have high places Cons openly calling for civil war if the election doesn't get handed to them.

Chuck Norris is part of the problem, he and people like him drip of fake patriotism. They need to stop before things get really out of hand.

reply to post by seabag

---

You honestly don't see a difference between being unable to carry out campaign promises, and a candidate openly lieing on stage about real events-then shrugging his shoulder and LITERALLY saying "Facts don't matter, it's resonating with the voters"??

reply to post by lordtyp0

---

You honestly don't see a difference between being unable to carry out campaign promises, and a candidate openly lieing on stage about real events-then shrugging his shoulder and LITERALLY saying "Facts don't matter, it's resonating with the voters"??

You honestly can't tell when you're being led?

What did Romney or Ryan lie about? Have you done your own research?

They said they won’t let “fact-checkers” dictate the campaign. The fact checking was bogus!

I don't think the evangelicals mentioned in the OP are going to like all of Obama's broken promises...he didn't deliver...I think they'll be voting this year!

Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by lordtyp0

---

I originally was not going to reply to this, its too pedantic in the commentary. But you need a bit of an education. Of course, I have come to the conclusion that "Libertarians" and current "Conservative Republicans" don't care about facts, rationality or evidence-they only care about winning. I am predicting now that you will ignore every point I make and instead focus on a single typo, or create a straw man, or perhaps, just ignore the post all together while "hrumphin" with sympathetic ears.

The party of LIES??? This thread never mentioned democrats!

Let’s take a look at the Liar-in-Chief:
*Open and transparent government? NOPE!
*No pork barrel spending? NOPE!
*5 days to read every bill before he signs it? NOPE!
*Meetings with lobbyists will be online and on Cspan for all to see? NOPE!

OP didn't cite political party, but did call for Evangelicals to swarm to the polls, Chuck Norris is also all about "taking back 'merica for Jesus". Am I to infer it was a call for Democratic political action? The transparancy-which you cite 3 times when in fact it is one-so lets condense: This is a: President doing pork barrel spending and B: Lack of advertised transparency.

Perhaps you didn't know-but Pork Barrel Spending comes from CONGRESS putting riders onto bills. Usually the bills are named something contradictory like "SAVE THE PRECIOUS CHILDREN FROM EVIL COMMIES AND SATANISTS SO THEY CAN PLAY WITH PUPPIES IN CHURCHES!!!" when the law actually reads something like "Give open wire tap laws over all internet traffic, add 100million dollars to Lockheed for another plane project, buy all the miniature monkey statues in Deluth Iowa for 50,000 dollars a piece".

Cept that law, if struck down suddenly becomes "OBAMA HATES WHITE CHILDREN!" and the same riders get attached to every other bill. Eventually they make it into one that are mandatory like-keeping agencies funded for the quarter (Though technically ONCE congress gave the president power of a line item veto-that is only applicable on budgets). So eventually those barrel projects get pushed through and the president gets slammed either way. In Oregon the same techniques were employed. The Democrat Gov promised to fix roads. Every road budget plan which came from the state congress had a rider to do mandatory prayer in school. Which-the Republicans pounced on him for purposely vetoeing every bill to fix the roads.

He was a one term Gov.

For transparency-it is all very complicated legally. IMO Lobbyists should be drowned in bags. But commonly those meetings include legally protected information like corporate and trade secrets. Obama should not have promised some of the things as if he actually did them-it would have made tax-payers liable for all sorts of lawsuits. This was naivete, not deception.

*Lobbyists will not work in my administration? NOPE!
*We will develop a full budget to eliminate waste? NOPE!
*We will cut the deficit in half in my first term? NOPE!
*I will close GITMO? NOPE!
*If you make less than $250,000 your taxes will not go up? NOPE!

Lobbyists are crap, I am willing to say it was a political favor to someone to get something done, and was a huge mistake-like Monsanto in charge of the FDA?? That is unconscionable.

He tried to cut the deficit, tried to close Gitmo too: The Cons halted all efforts. Calling this a lie and his fault is as Chris Rock said: Since the man can't cure Cancer, I'm gonna vote for Cancer! The problem was the Cons, the rest is smoke screening to perform the mandate of "Doing everything in their power to make Obama a one termer"

*If you like your doctor, under Obamacare you can keep him? NOPE!
*I don’t want to run auto companies or banks? NOPE!
*Shovel ready? NOPE!

First is wrong. Obamacare does nothing to change your doctor. Im guessing you actually know nothing about the law.
What do banks and autocompanies have to do with this discussion?
Shovel?
Is this some sort of random crazy rant like one sees in a cornfield sign sometimes?

Would you like me to keep going???

I invite you to present rational arguments and evidence. I have never heard of Obama promising to not raise taxes on those over 250k. In fact it seems one of the biggest critiques has been his attempts to "Spread the wealth". Can't have it both ways.

reply to post by seabag

---

I think it is you confused about the leash. Even fox news called the Romney campain out for lieing. The article only lasted a couple days on propaganda TV though.

www.politiscoop.com...

Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags

Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags

*VID* Proof Romney and RNC is a sham causing potential Republican civil war.
  Posted 11 days ago with 77 member flags

FOX News and Others Take Ryan to the Woodshed for "Blatant Lies." ...Seriously, FOX News.
  Posted 12 days ago with 65 member flags

A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags

Why the GOP Is Scared of Ron Paul and 4 Reasons He Might Still Get the 2012 Republican Nomination
  Posted 19 days ago with 45 member flags

Former RNC Chairman, Michael Steele criticizes Romney/RNC for the treatment of Ron Paul.
  Posted 11 days ago with 43 member flags

*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: