Huge Unknown Objects orbiting the Sun for months...?

page: 2
29
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 05:17 AM
link   
Someone posted a similar video this morning and I thought maybe a comet. But after seeming all of those videos, something is seriously out there and it ain't no comets...




posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 05:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by Arken
 


Whats with the porn music?

BTW, I have no clue what those are, I seriously doubt, however, an alien spaceship has been parked so close to the sun. Seems a bit impractical.


Not if you wanted to stay hidden and reap power from a energy source....ya I know these aren't hidden...but they are masked well in the corona of the sun, and unless your paying attention...you wont see them.



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 05:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by DaTroof

3. We're probably seeing natural satellites. (planet, comet,etc)


No. Nothing at all.

Planet moves in the background.
Stars moves in the background
Satellites moves fast
Comets moves fast
Asteroids movesvery very fast.
Meteors moves very very fast.

Something else up there...
edit on 3-9-2012 by Arken because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 06:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by SLAYER69
S&F just for the porn music

Very interesting videos


Hi there, SLAYER and thanks.

Why porn music?


The soundtracks are "Lounge Music"/ Chill-Out.
Very very Cool


And however let me know: what kind of sophisticated porn movies do you see?

Joke.



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 06:18 AM
link   
reply to post by SteveFrey
 





A fiber on the lens, you've got to be kidding me, that's ridiculous, unbelievable that they even used that explanation, you have to be very gullible to believe that.


And you have to be very gullible to believe there are things just hanging around the sun that aren't seen by sun watchers worldwide.





I am pretty sure they would be seen hanging around the sun. And if that isn't a fiber then please tell us what you think it is?

Here this will explain it all and then some....

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 06:18 AM
link   
A tiny black speck that remains in exactly the same place in the frame for weeks at a time? Let's think this through. What could possibly cause that? First, let's consider the possibility that it is a speck of dust on the filter. That would be thoroughly and completely impossible. Never in the recorded history of photography has a speck of dust ever caused a splotch to appear in a picture. It is physically impossible for dust to land on a lens or camera cover. Not gonna buy it. Having ruled out the impossible that leaves only one conclusion: a gigantic spaceship the size of Mercury has been carefully maneuvering to keep itself in precisely the same position relative to the Sun and a solar observation satellite for weeks on end. It's the only possible explanation.



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 06:31 AM
link   
reply to post by Xarian6
 





Begone debunkers! this is grown up talk about.. possibility's.. no need for your hokey vodo speak today but thanks for the effort none the less..


Well if your talking about possible things it could be then how can you not add these to your list...


Image artifacts

Not everything visible in STEREO images is related to the Sun or the solar atmosphere. Some features are caused by the telescope optics, the cameras used to capture the images, or how the STEREO spacecraft are operated. These features can be quite confusing, and require some explanation. Below we outline some of the common non-solar features which appear in the images.

Beacon data
Stars, planets, and comets
Background subtraction
Cosmic rays
Debris
Camera defects
Spacecraft rolls
Internal reflections
Corrupted and blank images


stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Oh, the possibilities.



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 06:36 AM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


My thoughts exactly!



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 06:41 AM
link   
reply to post by SteveFrey
 





My thoughts exactly!


I am guessing you misunderstood his post, but I could be wrong..



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 07:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by SteveFrey
reply to post by DaTroof
 


A fiber on the lens, you've got to be kidding me, that's ridiculous, unbelievable that they even used that explanation, you have to be very gullible to believe that.
edit on 3-9-2012 by SteveFrey because: add content


Notice the date

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Here's a pretty recent pic, still there

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

So, to avoid being gullible, I should believe that this object is actually something out in space orbiting the Sun at the necessary speed to remain in the same position in the field of view of STEREO A for nearly six years?



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 07:50 AM
link   
Nice you have that album too?!?!?! Isn't it just spacey.....


All i see are CD's



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 08:02 AM
link   
Enjoy your posts and helping mainstream education wake up to reality a little bit at a time. Even if we don't understand what really is going on, videos can truly open us up to new possible realities. I know so many youtube mars anomalies have, these are incredible as well.



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 08:40 AM
link   
Whats up with this object that gets bigger and bigger thruout the years. It is the, THE brightest thing seen in the night sky. IT, i believe is in the canis major constellation next to orion. The name is called cma sirus, i think. This unidentified object is getting brighter and bigger every year. How can u miss it. it is the brightest, biggest light in the whole night sky, next to orion. WTF. I believe it is inbound. Oh and it is not the space station either unless the space station is growing in size. Seen in MN on sept 2nd at 5 a.m central time. This is UFO to me, and why is it getting bigger? check it out, how can u miss it, unless clouds block your view.



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 11:10 AM
link   
Stars, having such an immense gravitational center, are perfect vehicles for inter-galactic travel.
their massive force of gravity warps the space-time fabric and allows ships to enter through the center at the ripple or rip in the space-time fabric.
If these ships are built to withstand the immense heat of being in the center of a nuclear explosion (which they obviously are) then our sun would be the perfect doorway to enter our solar system from.

It's just basic common intergalactic space sense if you ask me.

What? are you going to point me to some .gov site that "debunks" this as lens dust or some other lame crap of an excuse?

Like anyone in the government is on our side!
"hey guys look at what they say on .gov, see? we are wrong, let's go back to sleep"...



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 11:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by SteveFrey
 





My thoughts exactly!


I am guessing you misunderstood his post, but I could be wrong..


You are wrong, his sarcasm is my truth, I know what I see and just because we don't know how it would be possible for a ship to remain stationary parked next to the sun for six years doesn't mean it isn't so, they are obviously much more advanced than we are.



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 11:38 AM
link   
reply to post by cloaked4u
 


When the veil of chemtrails lifted for a moment the other night I quickly snapped this picture. I had to slightly adjust some things here and there to bring out what they are hiding. Here it is in all it's glory.

This picture isn't photoshopped in any way!



I use paint.
edit on 3/9/12 by D.Wolf because: typo



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 11:41 AM
link   
reply to post by TimesUp
 





What? are you going to point me to some .gov site that "debunks" this as lens dust or some other lame crap of an excuse?


Well then I take it you believe that what you see is some form of a UFO,correct? Anything to show this is something other than what those .gov sites say it is?

So you can believe anything want, all we can do is show you the truth but it is up to you if you want to believe it or not.



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 11:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by TimesUp
 





What? are you going to point me to some .gov site that "debunks" this as lens dust or some other lame crap of an excuse?


Well then I take it you believe that what you see is some form of a UFO,correct? Anything to show this is something other than what those .gov sites say it is?

So you can believe anything want, all we can do is show you the truth but it is up to you if you want to believe it or not.


Your obviously of the dark, look at your background image, the all seeing eye, who you foolin?



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 11:49 AM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


Or it could be someone editing the videos/images.

Who said you can't modify videos?



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 11:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
So, to avoid being gullible, I should believe that this object is actually something out in space orbiting the Sun at the necessary speed to remain in the same position in the field of view of STEREO A for nearly six years?


Didn't you get the memo? The new gullible is what we used to call being intelligent with the ability to form decisions based on facts and evidence.





new topics
top topics
 
29
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join